Creating several slanderous claims despite being told to stop several times is grounds for harassment. If you wish to have the new administrators clarify the harassment rule so you can understand in the future, then I urge you to go speak to them when they are appointed. For now, however, the report I filed was clearly worthy of a harassment violation.
Yet I believe all of us can agree that creating a fake story of someone being a rapist and a pedophile has far worse connotations than that of a thief.
I'm just using this to get to the root of your claim. You're saying that there's a difference between being called names and being accused of a crime. Do you think I should get a vio for calling you a thief? For calling you a pedophile? For calling you a murder? For calling you anything? Where do you draw the line and why? You wouldn't vio me for accusing you of one crime. Why would you vio me for accusing you of another crime? I'm pointing out that your point of view has conflicts and asking how you resolve them.
You mean the photograph of a from the Internet I linked a user to who was the same age as me, 17?
That does not make me a rapist nor a pedophile like you claimed and insisted.
As this happened off-site, it held no ground here, yet when I was speaking to the moderators of this lobby, they felt as though I was being rude and that is why I was banned from the lobby -- not the incident itself. Bebop stated I would have been fine if I did not have an attitude.
you can jokingly call your friend a thief for taking something without your permission (technically theft, but no harm done if they're ok with it)
pedophilia is never defensible
if you said i stole copyrighted code or something for emjack, that would be a more serious offense
deletedover 7 years
Jamal, I really dont understand why you keep going on with this because if you really want me to get proof all I have to do is ask the person you sent a pic to last year. Keep trying to say it's false but most of the people know about it anyway
Repeated slanderous attacks were made towards me. It is not about being offended, it is about the slander potentially damaging how people view me. I told the user in question to stop several times (as shown in the pictures) and he continued. This is the very definition of harassment this site uses.
You prove to be an incapable moderator as you do not even understand the rules you are meant to enforce, Whitepimp007.
"Making repeated/severe personal attacks toward or slandering another Epicmafia user when the user has shown the harasser that he is offended. If filing on behalf of another user, one must show the consent of the harassed person."
So what you are stating is that I can now create false stories of someone being a r*pist and p*dophile and if I receive a violation for harassment, I can count on you to overturn it?
