The question posed in this thread is not necessarily one of the moderation team, the site owner lucidrains/Phillip Wang, or other moderators/admins on the moderation team of this website.
People are calling for Ethereal's head because they were recently promoted from role moderator to moderator. The people calling for Ethereal to be demodded are generally viewing and accusing Ethereal as a predator.
My question is, if you guys care so much about Ethereal being a potential predator, should you not be arguing that Ethereal should be site banned? (Personally, I don't think Ethereal should be site banned. She has done her time for being banned and is currently a very big help for the moderators and cheating investigation team, in my opinion.) Your argument seems to not want to rid the website of possible predators, but to just make sure they don't become moderators. It doesn't really make much sense to me.
And even if Ethereal is demodded, guess what? She's still going to help with Cheating cases and finding banned users... nothing is going to change (except that she won't be able to do reports). Is that really going to be a sigh of relief for all of you?
So if Ethereal is demodded, what difference is it to you people if she's still allowed to be on the website...?
EDIT:
I am in favour of demodding Ethereal to please the community fwiw (I was before I even made this thread), but if we do that I don't really get why they are even allowed to be on the site anyways. I'm seeing these arguments I just don't agree with them; potential is potential at the end of the day, and I believe Ethereal should be allowed to stay on the site
I know the forum wipe removed a lot of history but man the revisionism in here is amazing.
It's EM, what do you expect?
Yo you should check out the other Bearguru thread.
Like no one is giving grief about Petri's orientation (or whatever the correct term is, I'm horrible with this stuff), so don't try and turn it into that. You don't see me pulling antics based on myself.
they were promoted for their "diligent/hard work" as role mods
lmfao. good lord
deletedabout 10 years ago
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
ethereal isn't a bad choice at all, arcbell is.
you can apply the "safer choice" to ethereal then, because even if she's good clearly it caused quite a stir that could've been avoided with other people being chosen
no I just know what pedophila means and I have standards that cheating makes you a bad person and scum
I have .. standards.
deletedabout 10 years ago
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
I've applied to be a mod 3x over different admins in this past year but nobody knows me because I don't circlejerk competitive.............
There can be those people and they don't have to be pedophiles, cheaters, and hackers.
you're no better than these cheaters and pedophiles, don't get ahead of yourself
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
ethereal isn't a bad choice at all, arcbell is.
you can apply the "safer choice" to ethereal then, because even if she's good clearly it caused quite a stir that could've been avoided with other people being chosen
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
I've applied to be a mod 3x over different admins in this past year but nobody knows me because I don't circlejerk competitive.............
There can be those people and they don't have to be pedophiles, cheaters, and hackers.
you're no better than these cheaters and pedophiles, don't get ahead of yourself
O_________________________________________O
You don't even know me..................
and that's super insulting.
deletedabout 10 years ago
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
listen i understand both sides of this, but honestly, i care more about someone who's willing to make the community a smarter and better place by removing toxic, annoying, and trash players. that's just me
as i said in the other thread, i refuse to believe that there were no better (or perhaps, safer) options for doing said job than sammie and arcbell
I've applied to be a mod 3x over different admins in this past year but nobody knows me because I don't circlejerk competitive.............
There can be those people and they don't have to be pedophiles, cheaters, and hackers.
you're no better than these cheaters and pedophiles, don't get ahead of yourself