The issue isn't that they're heterosexual, the issue is they're hetero. Unless they're both ace and aro, but even then they don't really face any problems.
So are you really going to say bisexuals/homosexuals are purely based on sex? Bisexual people ONLY have sex with other people? They're not anything else?
The 'sexual' refers to gender. Homo(same) bi(more than 1)
homosexual ppl are attracted to the same gender- you can't argue that ace people cant be heterosexual because they aren't sexual while simultaneously not implying that the word bisexual and homosexual are not purely sexual.
Most homosexuals are homoromantic as well. Most bi people are biromantic, most heterosexuals are heteroromantic, etc.
You are combining heterosexuality with hetero romanticism.
Like I said, you can feel romantic towards someone without having sexual feelings and vice versa. They are not a packaged deal.
Implying that the lesbian, bi, gay and trans community, shortened to LGBT, which was created to combat specifically homophobia and transphobia as well as create a voice for these oppressed peoples, should include every sexuality that's weird, which is the same rhetoric as conservatives, is really nasty. We're not weird. Quit saying its for all 'deviants'. It's not.
Aces are 100% real, 100% valid. But if they are cis and het, they are not LGBT. It's really that simple.
They can't be heterosexual if they aren't sexual.
think you've got a few cogs loose
How can you be heterosexual if you aren't sexually attracted to people of the opposite gender?
shhhh don't challenge idiots with simple logic; that's homophobic!
So are you really going to say bisexuals/homosexuals are purely based on sex? Bisexual people ONLY have sex with other people? They're not anything else?
The 'sexual' refers to gender. Homo(same) bi(more than 1)
homosexual ppl are attracted to the same gender- you can't argue that ace people cant be heterosexual because they aren't sexual while simultaneously not implying that the word bisexual and homosexual are not purely sexual.
Implying that the lesbian, bi, gay and trans community, shortened to LGBT, which was created to combat specifically homophobia and transphobia as well as create a voice for these oppressed peoples, should include every sexuality that's weird, which is the same rhetoric as conservatives, is really nasty. We're not weird. Quit saying its for all 'deviants'. It's not.
Aces are 100% real, 100% valid. But if they are cis and het, they are not LGBT. It's really that simple.
They can't be heterosexual if they aren't sexual.
think you've got a few cogs loose
How can you be heterosexual if you aren't sexually attracted to people of the opposite gender?
Implying that the lesbian, bi, gay and trans community, shortened to LGBT, which was created to combat specifically homophobia and transphobia as well as create a voice for these oppressed peoples, should include every sexuality that's weird, which is the same rhetoric as conservatives, is really nasty. We're not weird. Quit saying its for all 'deviants'. It's not.
Aces are 100% real, 100% valid. But if they are cis and het, they are not LGBT. It's really that simple.
Implying that the lesbian, bi, gay and trans community, shortened to LGBT, which was created to combat specifically homophobia and transphobia as well as create a voice for these oppressed peoples, should include every sexuality that's weird, which is the same rhetoric as conservatives, is really nasty. We're not weird. Quit saying its for all 'deviants'. It's not.
Aces are 100% real, 100% valid. But if they are cis and het, they are not LGBT. It's really that simple.
Implying that the lesbian, bi, gay and trans community, shortened to LGBT, which was created to combat specifically homophobia and transphobia as well as create a voice for these oppressed peoples, should include every sexuality that's weird, which is the same rhetoric as conservatives, is really nasty. We're not weird. Quit saying its for all 'deviants'. It's not.
Aces are 100% real, 100% valid. But if they are cis and het, they are not LGBT. It's really that simple.
If straights were oppressed, we would have a straight movement and be debating on whether asexuals fall into the straight category.
Straights are being oppressed in the LGBTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP+ community.
On a serious note tho, straights make up the majority of the population because the majority of the population was sexually developed correctly, and most of these well sexually developed people aren't poosis, since they sexually developed to be manly (if men) and evil (if whamen).
i mean the lgbt "movement" but they would still be lgbt in the sense that the individual people would still be defined as lesbian gay bi or trans, or lgbt if one ever needed to refer to the collectively
See, you proved you are ret*rded. LGBT as in the movement wouldn't exist if they were all accepted.
OK, damn. That's all I asked. I wasn't trying to catch you in a "gotcha", I was asking for clarification and yet you're acting like I killed your family. Chill.
Because I was clear a million times and you kept asking as if I wasn't.
It wasn't clear to me. That's why I asked for CLARIFICATION.
See, you proved you are ret*rded. LGBT as in the movement wouldn't exist if they were all accepted.
OK, damn. That's all I asked. I wasn't trying to catch you in a "gotcha", I was asking for clarification and yet you're acting like I killed your family. Chill.
Because I was clear a million times and you kept asking as if I wasn't.
See, you proved you are ret*rded. LGBT as in the movement wouldn't exist if they were all accepted.
OK, damn. That's all I asked. I wasn't trying to catch you in a "gotcha", I was asking for clarification and yet you're acting like I killed your family. Chill.
You still haven't explained why they can't just be asexual, or they haven't found the right person yet ... why do they need to be put under this oppression umbrella ?
What do you mean "can't just be asexual"? Please elaborate on how I didn't address that.
Also, are gay people not gay because "they just haven't found the right girl yet?"
You're the one who asks hypothetical questions to try and corner me into conclusions that are illogical to come to.
Hypotheticals are a cornerstone of debate. If hypotheticals automatically make your brain discompute that is not on me.
You're f*cking r*tarded, you know that?
In your hypothetical, LGBT movement wouldn't exist and you ask me if straight people would be LGBT.
No, I never said LGBT movement wouldn't exist. I said that in this hypothetical country, LGBT people are excepted. If they aren't being oppressed, are they still LGBT?
You said only oppressed sexualities can fall under LGBT so i was asking for clarification by using this hypothetical.
That was all I asked, and yet you're acting like I compared puppies to Hitler.
Both puppies and Hitler kill no innocent people on purpose, so I guess his point is valid then :thunk:
You're the one who asks hypothetical questions to try and corner me into conclusions that are illogical to come to.
Hypotheticals are a cornerstone of debate. If hypotheticals automatically make your brain discompute that is not on me.
You're f*cking r*tarded, you know that?
In your hypothetical, LGBT movement wouldn't exist and you ask me if straight people would be LGBT.
No, I never said LGBT movement wouldn't exist. I said that in this hypothetical country, LGBT people are excepted. If they aren't being oppressed, are they still LGBT?
You said only oppressed sexualities can fall under LGBT so i was asking for clarification by using this hypothetical.
That is what I was asking, and yet you're acting like I compared puppies to Hitler.
See, you proved you are ret*rded. LGBT as in the movement wouldn't exist if they were all accepted.
You're the one who asks hypothetical questions to try and corner me into conclusions that are illogical to come to.
Hypotheticals are a cornerstone of debate. If hypotheticals automatically make your brain discompute that is not on me.
You're f*cking r*tarded, you know that?
In your hypothetical, LGBT movement wouldn't exist and you ask me if straight people would be LGBT.
No, I never said LGBT movement wouldn't exist. I said that in this hypothetical country, LGBT people are excepted. If they aren't being oppressed, are they still LGBT?
You said only oppressed sexualities can fall under LGBT so i was asking for clarification by using this hypothetical.
That was all I asked, and yet you're acting like I compared puppies to Hitler.
You see, this is why God did this in a very simple way. Sodomy is a sin, and you get killed for it, as easy as that. Doesn't matter what you're attracted to as long as you don't act on it. Therefore, Ace aren't literally Satan, therefore they aren't part of the LGBTQABCDEFG+ sinners.