>implying there's a difference between romanticality (or whatever the fk it is) and sexuality
Haven't you ever thought that a complete b!tch with a terrible personality was hot?
Of course I did. I wouldn't fk her cuz that's degenerate, but yea, she's hot, but that doesn't make me a heteroromantic special snowflake.
I didn't say it does...you'd have to think that of every single girl you were attracted to to be aromantic, but I assume you don't.
And even if you do, you don't have to label yourself with something you don't want to, but don't be afraid of doing so just because you may look like a trigglypuff.
If you're going to use the split attraction model, which I know very well, then by that logic heteroromatic aces are still not LGBT.
If you knew it well, why did you play dumb when you knew exactly what I was speaking of? Was it just to make me look stupid in front of others?
Anyways, when i am speaking about LGBT the label, NOT the movement, I define it by "falling outside of heterosexual, heteroromantic, and cisgender". If you define it some other way then whatever, but that's where I am coming from.
ill try this one more time. instead of defining LGBT as "not heterosexual," how about you define is as people who ARE LESBIAN GAY BI OR TRANS
I'm sorry for saying LGBT throughout the thread. I was just shortening it for convenience, although I did say the full term in my first comment. It's LGBTQ+. If you see that as too cringy and tumblr-ey for casual use, I agree, but that is what I mean.
if you say 'not heterosexual' you literally paint gay ppl as purely sexual. you didn't specify using the split attraction model, which only works for aces
i'm not trying to make you look stupid :(
the acronym is literally 'lesbian, gay, bi, trans' there is no label its an acronym
I didn't say "not heterosexual". I said "not heterosexual, heteroromantic, or cisgendered".
Actually, it's LGBTQ+. I just shortened it for convenience. If you think it's too tumblr to use without cringing in public I agree, but that is the actual term.
If you're going to use the split attraction model, which I know very well, then by that logic heteroromatic aces are still not LGBT.
If you knew it well, why did you play dumb when you knew exactly what I was speaking of? Was it just to make me look stupid in front of others?
Anyways, when i am speaking about LGBT the label, NOT the movement, I define it by "falling outside of heterosexual, heteroromantic, and cisgender". If you define it some other way then whatever, but that's where I am coming from.
ill try this one more time. instead of defining LGBT as "not heterosexual," how about you define is as people who ARE LESBIAN GAY BI OR TRANS
if you say 'not heterosexual' you literally paint gay ppl as purely sexual. you didn't specify using the split attraction model, which only works for aces
i'm not trying to make you look stupid :(
the acronym is literally 'lesbian, gay, bi, trans' there is no label its an acronym
If you're going to use the split attraction model, which I know very well, then by that logic heteroromatic aces are still not LGBT.
If you knew it well, why did you play dumb when you knew exactly what I was speaking of? Was it just to make me look stupid in front of others?
Anyways, when i am speaking about LGBT the label, NOT the movement, I define it by "falling outside of heterosexual, heteroromantic, and cisgender". If you define it some other way then whatever, but that's where I am coming from.