deletedalmost 10 years

I would like to have a thought provoking and civil conversation about ISIS.....what you think will stop them, what will make it worse. Please make this a civil and appropriate discussion. i am looking for a good conversation not a flame war.

deletedalmost 10 years

Peta says

Hahahahahaha holy moly you are just denying the basic tenets of science now


You're treating this far too much as black and white.
almost 10 years

Slow says

atheists are virgins. you cannot unprove this. what now.


=[
almost 10 years

Slow says

atheists are virgins. you cannot unprove this. what now.


That's you, actually.
deletedalmost 10 years
atheists are virgins. you cannot unprove this. what now.
almost 10 years

Slow says

whenever my grandpa says assshit, my first instinct is to post it on the internet and see what happens.


please tell me about non-a*s-stemming sh*t.
almost 10 years
IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO ACCEPT AN UNPROVEN ENTITY THAN TO ASSUME SAID ENTITY DOES NOT EXIST
almost 10 years
I'm #1
almost 10 years
You know what's sad? I learned more about my own beliefs on epicmafia.com than in school.
deletedalmost 10 years
whenever my grandpa says assshit, my first instinct is to post it on the internet and see what happens.
almost 10 years
Ahaha those drama queen reactions to a troll
almost 10 years

DiscoOwl says

Denial of something's existence comes with far more ulterior implications than what are immediately presented. Should one deny something's existence then they should at least have a placeholder in mind of what the alternative is. The default allocation for this placeholder makes far less sense, in my mind, than the broad possibilities of something somewhat supernatural.

But apparently having this view makes me an idiot, at least by your standards.


Hahahahahaha holy moly you are just denying the basic tenets of science now
almost 10 years
I'm either #5 or #4. It depends on the day really, but I've stopped worrying about it.
deletedalmost 10 years
Denial of something's existence comes with far more ulterior implications than what are immediately presented. Should one deny something's existence then they should at least have a placeholder in mind of what the alternative is. The default allocation for this placeholder makes far less sense, in my mind, than the broad possibilities of something somewhat supernatural.

But apparently having this view makes me an idiot, at least by your standards.
almost 10 years
Shivv and DiscoOwl dishing out sweet burns on the high school student
almost 10 years
Commonly accepted categorizations of theist/agnostic/atheist!!! Drivel, I say!
almost 10 years
Ok Smor was dumb let's move on
deletedalmost 10 years
All of those macro-posts, they were regurgitations of his Grandpa. Not his views
almost 10 years

DiscoOwl says


Peta says

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_theistic_probability#Dawkins.27_formulation


Why are you linking me this drivel?


Wikipedia is truly drivel
deletedalmost 10 years

Slow says


Smorlicious says


Connor says


Smorlicious says

I want us to nuke the middle east tbh


you're messed up


It'd solve a lot of problems.


do you know how the world works. like do you have any understanding


He was Joke-making!!
almost 10 years
"Denial of something's existence makes the least sense to someone who's inclined to say he doesn't know whether something exists."
- DiscoOwl, a post-scientific revolution human person
deletedalmost 10 years

Smorlicious says


Connor says


Smorlicious says

I want us to nuke the middle east tbh


you're messed up


It'd solve a lot of problems.


do you know how the world works. like do you have any understanding
deletedalmost 10 years
almost 10 years

DiscoOwl says

Just speaking hard truths.


You're an idiot haha
almost 10 years
I've never actually had the discussion with an atheist though.
almost 10 years