and tbh a lot more non-mods who also have opinions and would be able to serve on juries equally with you have decided that it was not worthy of a gt vio
and yet you reject this proposal and therefore are exposing a blatant bias to mods.
deleteddeletedabout 8 years ago
the decision on the memoji gt vio was almost unanimous if not unanimous and was settled before reset
8
deleteddeletedabout 8 years ago
actually we paused the round to look at the top 3's games, but okay
but then they would have explicitly stated that the reason was grudging someone so as to avoid this confusion in the first place also no i don't think it is fair to say that because it is an intuitive thing that someone might grudge after another game that they would do so in the next one.
it is also impossible to prove and so it 'must' be a gut reaction from mods if your opinion is true.
Mods give a GT vio if you deliberately play for certain person's win or loss over yourself for reasons that don't come from the game you're currently playing.
Also, I've looked for history of report filed by Phoenixi and Memoji and I found some GT reports that, according to their descriptions, could be handled as a newbie play. Phoenixi, aware that it could be GT to hammer his hooker and that he has already got a game related vio in this round, knowing the consequences, would he risk throwing against another runner?
The pause is a questionable thing, that I bet mods were discussing for a little of time as they opinions were split, they were looking for something else about Phoenixi to decide whether to vio or not. Ally said that that the verdict is given by mods and it's a GT vio as Phoenixi's playstyle was visibly different. blacksnakemoan pointed out a game where Phoenixi led a lynch on MrNice out of grudge and it was noted what kind of account Phoenixi was. It was followed by the previous game where Phoenixi assumed MrNice threw a game against him.
However, I see that Phoenixi still plays for his win condition. He wanted MrNice lynched regardless of his alignment as he believed this mislynch would help him win the game, although it warranted a GT vio due to grudge. His caps shows his determination, which can be found in some of Memoji games as well. He still had much more reason to win than lose the game, as he had won 10 games and lost 6 (I was wrong previously saying 5, I didn't include the loss in MrNice game) while as Memoji he had won 13 games and lost 7. So he had more hearts to play out and a chance to reach more points as Phoenixi over Memoji.
I have never seen Phoenixi trying to intentionally lose his game, even in the one he got his first GT vio, as explained above.
hey guys site is dying lets not use our brains and be contrarians XD
deleteddeletedabout 8 years agoedited
I personally wouldn't care but which majority is that? The red heart? Runners don't like hipfires.
There wasn't enough there to call it an INTENTIONAL gt. Prezzy didn't get a spam vio either and nobody went out of their way to speak of their concern about him.
Perhaps an easy fix would only be letting you play on the account you're running, then again, people could still throw on secret alts.
deleteddeletedabout 8 years agoedited
It wasn't throwing. But hey you're still trophying and he's still claiming to quit comp and I still think this was a stupid verdict and none of it will change.
