It's come to my attention that this site is currently infested with Feeling types that are here for social engagement over the rational thinking that leads to successful mafia play. Change my mind.
it's called the "my point is already illustrated in the posts on this page and the OP of this thread, as well as in the thread where I actually said that, so i don't need to scour 20 pages of bs to find evidence for it" fallacy.
it's called the "my point is already illustrated in the posts on this page and the OP of this thread, as well as in the thread where I actually said that, so i don't need to scour 20 pages of bs to find evidence for it" fallacy.
i'm not going to look for anything in a 20-page thread about a pseudoscientific, online personality test based entirely on self-evaluation
Seeing as your post and this thread aren't corollary in the slightest, you might want to instead of espousing your feelings on the subject ignorant of why you're seeing what you're seeing.
and i don't need to, since i made that comment in a different thread in response to your babbling about F vs T type personalities, which you are still doing
and i don't need to, since i made that comment in a different thread in response to your babbling about F vs T type personalities, which you are still doing
i feel like there should be a category specifically for "people who use the myers-briggs personality test as a basis for making judgments about other people and think they're being sophisticated in doing so"
so, p types? are you inpp? ispj?
You'll find neither of those claims made by me in this thread. In fact, the claims from me you will find are verified by the actions of F types seeking to counter them.
Unfortunately for this post, it's very easy to distinguish between people that reason using FACT and DATA from people that espouse their feelings only to find out they can't support them.
You decide instead of conceding that you can't support the 6 statements you claimed I made, you make this post
Are you just a liar or a monkey with a computer?
Which I responded to by telling you to support your claim or admit that you're incapable of doing so as an F type. Somehow you tie this back to a statement I never made and ignore the post I made on the topic:
The only F types getting trashed by me and the ones reasoning based on emotion when there are FACTS or DATA contrary to the positions they're presenting. That's it. Beyond that you're making assumptions about me based on what I've done over what I've presented and that's not on me.
Obviously if I'm attacking A very specific behavior, I don't hold that position about the type as whole. In this thread you're willing to engage me despite your feelings to the contrary and another F type presented an article they thought helped their case. Obviously that position wouldn't be reflected in reality which is why I never claimed it.
Good night, F type. I hope FACTS and DATA don't give you nightmares or destroy your fragilely unsupported world.
]Eh I'm using two tabs and dragging back and forth between them to keep my quotes in order. I'd just use notepad if I were you.
I mean I literally just showed you contradicting yourself with no space for you to be pedantic. Arguing with you merely so you can dismiss what I'm saying as an F-Type argument (which isn't actually an argument btw) is pretty irritating. Night night.
The only F types getting trashed by me and the ones reasoning based on emotion when there are FACTS or DATA contrary to the positions they're presenting. That's it. Beyond that you're making assumptions about me based on what I've done over what I've presented and that's not on me.
Obviously if I'm attacking A very specific behavior, I don't hold that position about the type as whole. In this thread you're willing to engage me despite your feelings to the contrary and another F type presented an article they thought helped their case. Obviously that position wouldn't be reflected in reality which is why I never claimed it.