It's come to my attention that this site is currently infested with Feeling types that are here for social engagement over the rational thinking that leads to successful mafia play. Change my mind.
I'd ask you to source this, but it's an F type comment that's based solely off your emotions on the topic. There's a difference between having full confidence in myself and impulsive with my online interactions that have 0 bearing irl, and being someone that bases their world view off of how they feel in the moment.
Meaning the site is more casual, meaning the site is easier each time I come back because I'm sure the average age on this site has remained consistent over the years. I brought up your choice of playing a literal 50% win rate setup and a high paying pointfarm as key to keeping your winrate in check. Win rate is meaningless if all you do is pointfarm, because I'm sure we can both agree that pointfarming isn't the intent behind party mafia.
I'd be 18/10 if it weren't for vegging. Baring the "alts I don't recognize playing against me" I typically don't have problems winning games outside of poor interactions with F types.
Yea imagine a play style based on unbridled arrogance being successful on a casual site that trends towards appeals to emotion over facts or reason. The few games where I got to play with Bear were so mundane that I just afk'd and came back to fos correctly because are trivial when I have a competent person sharing my alignment.
Actually I've been making this point for years, but you F types are too sorry and casual to consider things like not point farming and improving at the base game.
Side note: I've had 6 wins vegged this round of 12 incomplete games. If I didn't take me 2 and half hours to complete 5 games I could sort my win rate out in a few months.
I mean, objectively (statistically) you are a bad mafia player. You have 740 wins out of 1656 games on Zovea and UniversalStudios combined (not counting suicides).
That is a 44.6% winrate and you can't dispute that considering it's objective.
Yet you identify as a T-type, and F-types have better winrates than you.
I think fundamentally we have differing opinions on mafia. I think F-types are more successful at winning in the end, because all you have to do is convince the person to not vote you. If you play the game attempting to use facts and and reads throughout the game, you might be OK at being clear (in your case, idk). The majority of players do rely on their feelings and emotions to take advantage of the town and do what they need to do.
On this website, being an "F-type" is more of a "T-type" method than actual "T-types"
The MBTI Foundation lists possible applications of test results (https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/my-mbti-results/ways-type-can-be-used.htm?bhcp=1) and all of them are subjective and ever-changing throughout life.
There will be no data other the scientists and psychologists attempting to interpret the results for each person individually; the best thing to do with these is to guide the person onto the path that MOST LIKELY, BECAUSE IT IS A SPECTRUM, fits their "type."
Well, since the Myers Briggs is strictly self-evaluation, the results will never be accurate, especially since there is no solid way to measure personality (nor will there ever be, IMO).
For example, if a depressed person provides a response to all the questions, they more than likely will receive a type that reflects introversion. For the sake of this example we will just use one type. (Also, I don't think all depressed people are introverted; however, it is likely they will be.)
One year later, the same depressed person is now takes medicine, regularly see a therapist, and has made a lot of new friends. They take the MBTI again. This time, they receive the trait of extroversion instead of introversion, along with other traits contradicting that of their previous test.
Now, I am not saying that either test was wrong, but the results will be different depending on your mood and other contexts. This could change depending on your age, weight, relationship status, and various different confidence-altering characteristics.
This is not a reliable test because it is a spectrum that is self-perceived. The MBTI is fun, easy to share, and relate to other people. The test in itself is a "social engagement tool" and best for posting on Facebook. There are no major clinical breakthroughs because of this test and there never will be.
