It's come to my attention that this site is currently infested with Feeling types that are here for social engagement over the rational thinking that leads to successful mafia play. Change my mind.
I think there's a fallacy of assuming that someone arguing against something means they're for the opposite, a byproduct of F types reasoning with their feelings instead of FACTS or DATA.
Where in this post do I state that comp games are a good indicator of skill, can you quote that line? This is what I mean when say that the points you're trying to make aren't reflected in reality.
Instead of shutting down mentally (F type), why not instead learn from YOUR MISTAKES? If my post is actually backtracking it should be fairly simple to line up the claims you claim I made with the post of me making those claims.
Or you can just admit you're incapable of using LOGIC and REASON because you're an F type.
If you weren't an F type and were capable of verifying what you type BEFORE you type to ensure that the position you're about to represent REFLECTS THE REALITY YOU LIVE IN:
There's no reasoning with a clear that has unilateral power to ruin the games and 0 expectation to do anything contrary to this. This is a the epitome of an F type based meta where you pander to a clear instead of focusing on scumhunting. I've been at this for years, this is just closest to breaking it down to a "science" as I've gotten.
1. Your poll says it's about even. Although, yeah, people come for fun, not to get some sense of achievement in life.
2. You're making the claim that F-Types are less successful in mafia, yeah? Provide some proof that one who gets an F-Type in that site of yours is incapable of using rational thinking when expected. Provide proof that an F-Type is a worse mafia player. You also complain that the F-Types in games hinder you from winning. Well, wouldn't it stand to reason that part of the skills required for playing the game is to convince others, F-Type or not, a good player would be able to fool feelers and thinkers. You're not the only person that faces this problem so why are you complaining again?
3. You argued that ranked was not a good indicator and that comp was. Okay, well we have F-Types here who've trophied, as far as I have seen with your two accounts, you haven't. So if you want people to respect your amazing T type prowess, then why not go for them?
You act as if it's expected that your personality reflects how well you present an argument, but again, there aren't books on the correlation between the success in their personal lives and Myers Briggs results and yet there are of IQ, so why not make a post about how high your IQ is? You'd look like a jacka** in the same way but get your point across better, no?
I haven't even gotten into the type propaganda, and I'm sure you know exactly where that's going. "Condescending" and "bitter" is subjective and doesn't change the fact that for the most part I haven't made any specific claims other than to point out F type behavior.
, all I'm asking is for him to prove F-Types are incapable of logic and reasoning when required because he's making it clear that's his position.
He's also relying on a personality quiz when there are better methods of proving your worth, about it, ironically in his feelings, and then throwing the words logic and reasoning around. He's a real brainlet.
Perfect for F types. 16P is specifically meant to introduce the subject to F types without invalidating their sense of self.
Validating feelings is indicative of T types and involves LOGIC and REASON that's far beyond the scope of just understanding what the people are talking about with the specific personality types and how they stack up against each other.
