Everyone wants their role to be added. This isn't for everyone.
While lucid is actually active at present, this thread is for fixing roles and mafia-related features. Improving the game itself is more important than adding a bunch of role clones.
No, it kills you if you change your vote during the day
deletedabout 8 years
I think diabolist would be better if they curse some[quote=sl0nderman]What if the diabolist is someone who curses someone to die if they vote a certain player, like cub mentioned earlier.
This would be better
Also Trickster should be more random / have something else
What if the diabolist is someone who curses someone to die if they vote a certain player, like cub mentioned earlier.
although, it could be made competitively viable if it predicts who a person will vote rather than triggering if a person changes their vote
that would be a better implementation overall
And the scrutineer keeps the original idea. Or is that too rehash-y
that would be a redundant role
scrutineer does suffer from predictability and depends on laziness to work, predicting votes would make it impossible to avoid simply by tallying votes in chat first
as-is, it just punishes people for having the convenience of switching votes instead of having to tally in chat first
A scrutineer "is a person who observes any process which requires rigorous oversight, either to prevent the occurrence of corruption or genuine mistakes. It is most commonly known as part of voting in an election, where the scrutineer observes the counting of ballot papers, in order to check that election rules are followed"
I don't know where this magic theme for the role started but I don't really like it.
Scrutineers are vote moderators. I think it works for a name. Diabolist, while a cool name and all, would be better served as a different role in my opinion.