Pro Lifer Punched

SnowPuppyover 7 years ago

A Pro-Life man was punched while trying to say babies in front of Planned Parenthood.

Video in link below:

https://www.liveaction.org/news/pro-life-assaulted-abortion-facility/?utm_content=83151986&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-18001922

NYC also recently passed a law allowing abortion up until birth. Is a baby 1 minute before birth less human then 1 minute after?

Poll
When should it be considered murder to kill a human?
After 2 years old (Peter Singer)19
Conception13
Can feel pain (18-19 weeks)11
Brain Waves Detected (42 days)1
Heartbeat (18 days old)0
SnowPuppyover 7 years agoedited
Time began when time went from 0 to 1
Linkeover 7 years ago
So time must be eternal then. Otherwise when did time begin?
deletedover 7 years ago
I really do struggle to see why the F*CK it's so hard to get

A woman, lets say, a **pe victim, gets the abortion right. It was not going to be good for her health, and she couldn't support it as she wouldn't know what to do. It wasn't her fault

And look, i could delve sooooo long into why it's just immature and wrong in general to get pregnant, and just kill a baby for their benefit, but at the end of the day.

It's wrong to kill a human being that can feel pain, and think
SnowPuppyover 7 years ago
Well time began, because if we had an infinite regress we would never arrive at the present "time".
Linkeover 7 years ago
Pre-time is an oxymoron... or at least it looks like one to me.
deletedover 7 years ago
DonnieDarko
Thundurus
DonnieDarko
VanityPrime
Thundurus
I think that ultimately the woman makes the decision as it affects her more then any man can imagine
Look, either abortion is removing a nest of unwanted cells, which case getting rid of it is a simple medical operation like an appendicitis, or it's the unjustified killing of an innocent.

Calling it "sad" within the context of your argument is irrelevant and meaningless, it cares no weight other then virtual signaling.

The entire reason why people hold the pro-life position in the first place isn't that they don't value the body autonomy of the woman, but they don't believe that ownership of ones body is a sufficient justification for killing a potential person.

This is why this debate can't be resolved is because most people talk past each other without actually considering the actual argument, it's just emotional virtual signaling clothed in apologetics on both sides.

P.S before you ask, I'm not "taking a side" it's just your argument is extremely weak and I don't think you've thought it through as carefully as you think you have.
very well said.
Honestly as a man, Ive never really considered it my choice whether or not a woman chooses to get an abortion, that should never be a man's place to decide.
so if you feel that because you have a p e n i s that you are not allowed to have an opinion on this topic, why are you still in the thread or even reading it? you believe you should be removed from this discussion, so remove yourself.

edit: nevermind, you did.
For the record the reason i joined the conversation in the first place is because I wanted to share my opinion because I think its important to share your opinion on topics like this.

As VanityPrime pointed out this conversation is going to loop forever because neither side is going to change their opinion.
DonnieDarkoover 7 years ago
Moldyches
voisu
men dont have control over womens bodies or how they choose to live their lives, f*ck off with your sexist "well what would the father think?" bullsh*t
Yeah and lets leave the women to chose to kill a child that could just as easily thrive in foster care. No volsu how SELFISH of me and how SEXIST that i am to consider the unborn childs life rather than "what the woman wants"

Because at the end of the day, I'm just a male, right?

Who's sexist now
she doesn't believe that it is killing a child, so you're argument is meaningless. you two are arguing about nothing because you are on completely different foundations, just as VanityPrime said.
VanityPrimeover 7 years ago
Thundurus
Honestly as a man, Ive never really considered it my choice whether or not a woman chooses to get an abortion, that should never be a man's place to decide.
You realize the presupposition caked into your argument completely ignores the actual subject matter of why Pro-Life people hold the position that they do.

If you can justify why bodily autonomy outweighs the life of a potential person, that would be a start.
deletedover 7 years ago
Sexism like Racism, requires Prejudice + Power in society.

Women do not have power over men in society and there are countless statistics that prove that statement.
Linkeover 7 years ago
Voisu do you support financial abortion by the father?
deletedover 7 years ago
voisu
men dont have control over womens bodies or how they choose to live their lives, f*ck off with your sexist "well what would the father think?" bullsh*t
Yeah and lets leave the women to chose to kill a child that could just as easily thrive in foster care. No volsu how SELFISH of me and how SEXIST that i am to consider the unborn childs life rather than "what the woman wants"

Because at the end of the day, I'm just a male, right?

Who's sexist now
DonnieDarkoover 7 years agoedited
Thundurus
DonnieDarko
VanityPrime
Thundurus
Abortion in general is always sad.

I think that contextualizing my argument in terms of someone choosing the life or death of someone else is wrong.

I think that ultimately the woman makes the decision as it affects her more then any man can imagine
Look, either abortion is removing a nest of unwanted cells, which case getting rid of it is a simple medical operation like an appendicitis, or it's the unjustified killing of an innocent.

Calling it "sad" within the context of your argument is irrelevant and meaningless, it cares no weight other then virtual signaling.

The entire reason why people hold the pro-life position in the first place isn't that they don't value the body autonomy of the woman, but they don't believe that ownership of ones body is a sufficient justification for killing a potential person.

This is why this debate can't be resolved is because most people talk past each other without actually considering the actual argument, it's just emotional virtual signaling clothed in apologetics on both sides.

P.S before you ask, I'm not "taking a side" it's just your argument is extremely weak and I don't think you've thought it through as carefully as you think you have.
very well said.
Honestly as a man, Ive never really considered it my choice whether or not a woman chooses to get an abortion, that should never be a man's place to decide.
so if you feel that because you have a p e n i s that you are not allowed to have an opinion on this topic, why are you still in the thread or even reading it? you believe you should be removed from this discussion, so remove yourself.

edit: nevermind, you did.
SnowPuppyover 7 years ago
Linke
That’s why we are in “Off-Topic” forum.
Snow Puppy you can’t pre-exist time :p that’s a paradox.

If God is eternal then I’m gonna argue that the universe was eternal.
The universe can't be eternal, because we have evidence it began. The big bang, and expansion of the universe.

Many scientists have tried to prove the universe is eternal and couldn't do it.

How do you know nothing can pre-exist time.
deletedover 7 years ago
Y'all have a good evening. It is 2 am here and I need to sleep.
deletedover 7 years ago
Im leaving this conversation, I dont find it productive or conducive to the atmosphere of this site.
DonnieDarkoover 7 years agoedited
voisu
men dont have control over womens bodies or how they choose to live their lives, f*ck off with your sexist "well what would the father think?" bullsh*t
i can kill my neighbor if I want. no one has control over how i choose to live my life

edit: he believes that this "choice" you are speaking of is killing a baby, so you're argument is meaningless. you two are arguing about nothing because you are on completely different foundations, just as VanityPrime said.
deletedover 7 years ago
DonnieDarko
VanityPrime
Thundurus
Abortion in general is always sad.

I think that contextualizing my argument in terms of someone choosing the life or death of someone else is wrong.

I think that ultimately the woman makes the decision as it affects her more then any man can imagine
Look, either abortion is removing a nest of unwanted cells, which case getting rid of it is a simple medical operation like an appendicitis, or it's the unjustified killing of an innocent.

Calling it "sad" within the context of your argument is irrelevant and meaningless, it cares no weight other then virtual signaling.

The entire reason why people hold the pro-life position in the first place isn't that they don't value the body autonomy of the woman, but they don't believe that ownership of ones body is a sufficient justification for killing a potential person.

This is why this debate can't be resolved is because most people talk past each other without actually considering the actual argument, it's just emotional virtual signaling clothed in apologetics on both sides.

P.S before you ask, I'm not "taking a side" it's just your argument is extremely weak and I don't think you've thought it through as carefully as you think you have.
very well said.
Honestly as a man, Ive never really considered it my choice whether or not a woman chooses to get an abortion, that should never be a man's place to decide.
deletedover 7 years ago
[/quote]I find moldy's tone to be consistent with the nastiness she described...[/quote]My cousin of mine who is now 6 years old was born when he was only 5 and a half months. I find it disgusting that people are allowed to murder an uborn child b/c it is a child at 5 and a half months for sure, and not simply look around and say. "You know what, maybe we should set boundaries for this"
voisuover 7 years ago
men dont have control over womens bodies or how they choose to live their lives, f*ck off with your sexist "well what would the father think?" bullsh*t
DonnieDarkoover 7 years ago
VanityPrime
Thundurus
Abortion in general is always sad.

I think that contextualizing my argument in terms of someone choosing the life or death of someone else is wrong.

I think that ultimately the woman makes the decision as it affects her more then any man can imagine
Look, either abortion is removing a nest of unwanted cells, which case getting rid of it is a simple medical operation like an appendicitis, or it's the unjustified killing of an innocent.

Calling it "sad" within the context of your argument is irrelevant and meaningless, it cares no weight other then virtual signaling.

The entire reason why people hold the pro-life position in the first place isn't that they don't value the body autonomy of the woman, but they don't believe that ownership of ones body is a sufficient justification for killing a potential person.

This is why this debate can't be resolved is because most people talk past each other without actually considering the actual argument, it's just emotional virtual signaling clothed in apologetics on both sides.

P.S before you ask, I'm not "taking a side" it's just your argument is extremely weak and I don't think you've thought it through as carefully as you think you have.
very well said.
deletedover 7 years ago
[quote=Moldyches][quote=voisu]
Moldyches
voisu
please be quiet oh my god are you forgetting the fact that sexism is a thing and for some ungodly reason men think theyre allowed to dictate womens lives?

how is my opinion even biased, all i said was women have the right to a choice
Look if you wanna read the discussion go for it. However it isn't smart to state a hollow ethical statement. "Women have a choice" well jesus wouldn't it suck if the child was female. All you're telling me from that statement is "Women should choose whether or not they want to kill their children". Because i am sure in some cases the dad wants the kid, right? Because in what world or universe would a father wish to have a child. But no, the father doesn't get a single word, b/c it is the woman's baby right?

Read this article before you go posting onto topics too grand for your tunnel vision
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/abortion/legal/fathers.shtml
That is not a source from a government or database. I posted earlier with regards to sourcing, using inauthentic sources with opinion based articles does not validate an argument.
VanityPrimeover 7 years agoedited
Thundurus
Abortion in general is always sad.

I think that contextualizing my argument in terms of someone choosing the life or death of someone else is wrong.

I think that ultimately the woman makes the decision as it affects her more then any man can imagine
Look, either abortion is removing a nest of unwanted cells, which case getting rid of it is a simple medical operation like an appendicitis, or it's the unjustified killing of an innocent.

Calling it "sad" within the context of your argument is irrelevant and meaningless, it cares no weight other then virtual signaling.

The entire reason why people hold the pro-life position in the first place isn't that they don't value the body autonomy of the woman, but they don't believe that ownership of ones body isn't a sufficient justification for killing a potential person.

This is why this debate can't be resolved is because most people talk past each other without actually considering the actual argument, it's just emotional virtual signaling clothed in apologetics on both sides.

P.S before you ask, I'm not "taking a side" it's just your argument is extremely weak and I don't think you've thought it through as carefully as you think you have.
deletedover 7 years ago
The universe is eternal.....

Laws that guide our everyday life such as the Law of Conservation of mass prove that the universe is eternal....
SnowPuppyover 7 years ago
so many votes on after 2 years old oO
I hope everyone is meme'ing lol
deletedover 7 years agoedited
[quote=voisu][quote=Moldyches]
voisu
please be quiet oh my god are you forgetting the fact that sexism is a thing and for some ungodly reason men think theyre allowed to dictate womens lives?

how is my opinion even biased, all i said was women have the right to a choice
Look if you wanna read the discussion go for it. However it isn't smart to state a hollow ethical statement. "Women have a choice" well jesus wouldn't it suck if the child was female. All you're telling me from that statement is "Women should choose whether or not they want to kill their children". Because i am sure in some cases the dad wants the kid, right? Because in what world or universe would a father wish to have a child. But no, the father doesn't get a single word, b/c it is the woman's baby right?

Read this article before you go posting onto topics too grand for your tunnel vision
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/abortion/legal/fathers.shtml