hotwhipzx says

PatrykSzczescie says

I have read both games thoroughly.

In the game where you NL'd and caused mafia to force NL on lylo, you should've received an ISP vio. Your course of action put town into a certain loss, which was avoided just by veg, but veg has never been an excuse to affect a verdict of a report if a questioned deed had been done before somebody vegged.

About the game where you pushed on magicalqueen the janitor. It doesn't doesn't matter if magicalqueen was janitor, cop or whoever else, the verdict is based on your intent. From D1 itself I can see that you pushed on guiltied cop claim without claiming a pr but looking like a pr, softing pr claim. However, on D2, you admitted you hadn't known the cop. However, you acknowledged magicalqueen's cop claim on D1 saying that she's not the cop and you pushed a shot on her. Therefore, you pushed on the only cop claim you knew, just after one line she said, which was a mere cop claim. This actually proves your grudge against magicalqueen.

But the thing is, just like I explained din the other thread, I wanted magical lynched because I was the journ. I did vote her at first just to mess with her but I did not lynch her because of a grudge, that is my entire point

Either way Idrc about the vio, thanks for taking the time out to atleast look at the games

it comes down to this:

if you thought she didnt have a cop cc, why do you think shes maf as uncced cop when you had a journalist cc

PatrykSzczescie says

I have read both games thoroughly.

In the game where you NL'd and caused mafia to force NL on lylo, you should've received an ISP vio. Your course of action put town into a certain loss, which was avoided just by veg, but veg has never been an excuse to affect a verdict of a report if a questioned deed had been done before somebody vegged.

About the game where you pushed on magicalqueen the janitor. It doesn't doesn't matter if magicalqueen was janitor, cop or whoever else, the verdict is based on your intent. From D1 itself I can see that you pushed on guiltied cop claim without claiming a pr but looking like a pr, softing pr claim. However, on D2, you admitted you hadn't known the cop. However, you acknowledged magicalqueen's cop claim on D1 saying that she's not the cop and you pushed a shot on her. Therefore, you pushed on the only cop claim you knew, just after one line she said, which was a mere cop claim. This actually proves your grudge against magicalqueen.

But the thing is, just like I explained din the other thread, I wanted magical lynched because I was the journ. I did vote her at first just to mess with her but I did not lynch her because of a grudge, that is my entire point

Either way Idrc about the vio, thanks for taking the time out to atleast look at the games

that isn't gt but it is definitely ISP, faking afk as mafia to influence the votes has always been ISP

But the thing is, just like I explained din the other thread, I wanted magical lynched because I was the journ. I did vote her at first just to mess with her but I did not lynch her because of a grudge, that is my entire point

I have read both games thoroughly.

In the game where you NL'd and caused mafia to force NL on lylo, you should've received an ISP vio. Your course of action put town into a certain loss, which was avoided just by veg, but veg has never been an excuse to affect a verdict of a report if a questioned deed had been done before somebody vegged.

About the game where you pushed on magicalqueen the janitor. It doesn't doesn't matter if magicalqueen was janitor, cop or whoever else, the verdict is based on your intent. From D1 itself I can see that you pushed on guiltied cop claim without claiming a pr but looking like a pr, softing pr claim. However, on D2, you admitted you hadn't known the cop. However, you acknowledged magicalqueen's cop claim on D1 saying that she's not the cop and you pushed a shot on her. Therefore, you pushed on the only cop claim you knew, just after one line she said, which was a mere cop claim. This actually proves your grudge against magicalqueen.

In this report charley was reported for mod abuse:

https://epicmafia.com/report/251706

Now some days later the violation is gone. One can only assume she removed the violation on herself with her mod powers, making it double mod abuse, because she mod abused the power to remove mod abuse.

How long will this go on?

hotwhipzx says

On a serious note HOW many users have complained about Chalrey in the past month alone? Like 20? I have seen so many threads of users saying the same and she is still here and its sick. I got a GT violation because charley felt like I did something unethical basically. So now that we can get vios without actually violating the SET FORTH RULE where does it stop? this is a slipper slope and this is why the site is dying.

you and mtlve.. not even lying just you two.

Ouch 23 with two kids?

saggin like my grandma earlobe

hotwhipzx says

You guys are really going to ignore the words im saying now while holding my in game words to a higher standard? How does that work? Im explaining what I was doing and you guys are just like "nope we don't care"

yes that's exactly what we're going to do, because your in game words are what you were thinking at the time and your words now are you trying to get out of a vio