https://epicmafia.com/report/248687
I'm sorry but the moderators are pulling the same garbage that they did last time I was running. This wasn't gamethrow, you linked a thread there, do you honestly expect everyone to read that longass thread before they play Manhunt?
I was agent with a Killer and a Spy. I was in autoloss, they weren't going to no lynch, they were going to lynch me until I said I'd rather killer win for the meme.
You guys act as if they were going to no lynch, and kill each other, but that was never a scenario.
This wasn't at all vio worthy and I'm appealing this for that reason.
I don't deserve a gamethrow violation, ANYONE who read that game can see I clearly wasn't throwing and was playing with the intent to win.
The person who voted you is also at fault here for voting you instead of nling and not unvoting when you crossed them. Or not waiting for the killer to vote you and risk getting them hammered. So the mafia does not deserve a refund here. They didnt try anything to save themselves. They just expected killer to not throw away more points. Killer played optimally and went for maximum points.
You dont understand ogi either. I didnt say you have to tell them they are throwing. Im saying they will automatically be choosing to lose if they dont act upon your threat. It seems you are now acting dumb on purpose to avoid getting a vio.
deletedalmost 7 years
1: You are Hunter/Agent/Vigilante/Jailer in a 3-way with Killer & Spy/Stalker: Voting anything other than "no lynch" IS GT. If you are Jailer, and you no lynch, jailing either of them IS GT. If you are Vigilante, and you no lynch, shooting at night is NOT GT. If killer kills mafia and mafia no kills, you can only win by shooting killer.
1: You are Hunter/Agent/Vigilante/Jailer in a 3-way with Killer & Spy/Stalker:
You dont need to read a thread to know that you were throwing by doing what you did. It is common sense. If you are playing manhunt. You are supposed to know. You picked a loser with you. Which is gt. It has aways been. If the mods dont man up and give vios for this then they will always have people throwing.
And the setup is what it is. If you are playing it and winning huge points when maf kill each other accidentally then you are also supposed to be prepared for the negative side of the setup. Instances where you have no option.
You had to threaten the person voting u that you will vote them and let the other person hammer them. Then they will have to nl. Because then they would be throwing.
And blaming the mods for allowing this setup to ve comped is the height of hypocrisy. Why are you playing it? It is not like you have to play it just because it is comped. You can play one of the 5 other setups. If you play a setup you have to accept whatever it brings on the table.
That thread says nothing about agent killer and stalker
deletedalmost 7 years
he's allowed to sell out maf for lynching him because it has no bearing on his wincon and when you tell killer who you are you're leaving yourself open to betrayal it's part of the setup
deletedalmost 7 years
don't blame the setup just bc u and ur friend can't comprehend the difference between autoloss and having a chance of winning lol
deletedalmost 7 years
"Sold out maf".......but didnt choose who won. Here's a thought dont comp disabled set ups.
deletedalmost 7 years
miles didn't take the small chance he had at winning and instead put himself in 100% autoloss AND chose which side he wanted to win
deletedalmost 7 years
yiff didn't choose what side won and throw away their wincon (they were already being lynched), they just sold out the maf because they were voting them. that's a huge difference
deletedalmost 7 years
Talking of hypocrites here comes one of the biggest on here. This man now bullies 17 yr olds and report farms them then cries with his 10 alts when he gets reported. The type to say "I'm allowed to say fagggot cos I'm gay". An absolute joke of a kid.
balance has always been difficult when there are more than 2 factions in play
we can manipulate that to make it more fair in cases where a town can actually win, we force him to go for that win no matter how small of a chance he has, rather than allowing him to choose who wins
can't do it in that situation because yiff telling town who the mafia was has no bearing on their own win condition
deletedalmost 7 years
Look at this game u platypus looking wankstain. The seat sniffer ur protecting is a hypocrite she commended yiff(killer) on choosing town win here.
not sure why its hard for you guys to understand that what he did was wrong.
he chose who won the game by throwing away all chance for him to win
if you're arguing that "well he would've got lynched anyways so he was practically in autoloss", that would've been 10x better than what happened, because the points would've been reduced between the two factions rather than calcium getting 120
Aww poor lil ally must have really been in tears. Cavalry out here double posting a loada horse sh!t. There's a reason why no one likes u, its cos u always have metal poles stuck up ur àsses.
do you understand that you did something wrong and its unfair to allow people to choose who they want when they have a chance to win themselves? is it only that you want some leeway because you shouldn't be expected to know the rules
you played towards a loss and were the driving force of voting calciums cc so that he would win
anyone who can read the game is clearly going to see how you played for a loss because you were ACTIVELY trying to lynch on a day where the only chance you had was to vote nl
that being said it is kinda silly that you're expected to know that you'd get a gamethrowing vio for doing what you did, but its literally gamethrowing because you threw away your only shot at winning
