There's a pinned thread on the forums that clearly states how this setup can be played with regard to jointing. You took the guaranteed loss option rather than the minute possibility of a win.

"ok look calcium whatever role you are I'll help you win for more points"

I objectively have a problem with that line, and I'm going to refund it.

I learnt prisoners dilemma in economics

You'd expect better from a mod. So u want miles to nl which puts him in a loss???? He crossed which also put him in a loss. Also if ur gonna vio/refund this theres a lot more games that ended with the townsided role crossing mafia. Altho they ended joint wins the concept is the same and Ally by being salty is about to open a can of worms you probably dont want.

ALSO, bye is saying i was throwing against her, notice how i asked calcium if he was mafia or killer, IF CALCIUM WAS MAFIA, i would have voted the killer, meaning bye could have won there.

the only reason she lost was bc she didnt have the same alignment as calcium.

this isnt vio worthy because i wasnt thinking about making bye lose, i was thinking about how if i couldnt win and was in autoloss, at least calcium could win.

this is what happens when you comp a setup with killer I'm screaming

I'm not tryin' to defend Miles here from him essentially choosing who he'd prefer to win, but you can't say he threw the game against his own interest when he categorically was in autoloss.

Why would either scum want to vote NL here?

By doing so they basically broadcast their intention to betray their partner - there would be no rational justification for the scums to force an NL in 3way.

As for kingmaking... well he did do that I suppose - but this was bound to happen sooner or later once the setup got comped.

Ab igne ignem

& calcium coming into the report to defend his friend that’s throwing for him lol

this was 120 points towards calcium’s run that were given to him by a throw and it should be refunded

It wasn’t auto

They could’ve voted miles but nling and them killing each other still left him with a slim chance to win because if calcium wanted to betray which he did he would’ve nled

It’s detailed in the linked thread

If miles had voted NL then the two scum could have just voted Miles - if it was 4way then Miles wouldn't have been in autoloss but in this case he was.

Typical vio farm holden everytime hes running

You weren't in autoloss, if you nled they could've betrayed each other at night leaving you alive for town win. It's gamethrowing.

Bye, calciumkid is also running, so it had nothing to do with my run. I had never heard of this kingmaker rule and if someone could explain that to me it'd be fun.

As you can see, in the beginning of the day i attempted to try and win still, but when i realized i was in autoloss i decided id rather calcium win as the killer and get the 120 points, not only because i thoughtd it'd be funny and cool, but also because i simply thought he played better than the mafia that game.

The prisoner's dilemma i don't really understand, there was no way i could win there, so why not help the killer win? Is there even a vio called kingmaker? Because if there is i can't find it, and it should be more clear especially because this setup is comped.

Worth noting that I'm running and stand a good shot at surpassing his other account (holdenrye) on leaderboard and by doing that he ensured I wouldn't get points from it.