So there's been a lot of shooting recently and the president isnt doing about it.
Australia had its worst mass shooting in 1996 on the 28th of April. 12 days later australia announced a bipartisan deal on sweeping gun control measures. The government brought back and destroyed over a million guns. We (australia) haven't had a mass shooting since.
Why is Trump not doing anything. Children are dying. People aren't living their full lives. If comforting those who have been through trauma and lost loved ones is all they can do b*llfucking sh*t. If saying it will be okay to those victims then saying that to gun owners should be fine too.
Sorry im just annoyed with how this has all been going down.
if i started pulling, communist on paper vs reality and, not actual communism everybody would be on my , but whatever even if he did give the world wonder healthcare and good labour laws, wich are things i obviously support, that doenst end the tiranny of capital, and doesnt end the exploitation of the working class and it sure as hell doenst end capitalist imperialism
deletedalmost 7 years
i dont think an individual telling a latino to go back to mexico is as bad as black and brown bodies being murdered by the people in charge who are supposed to "protect and serve"
it doesnt really but, iraq, afghanistan, drone strikes in hospitals, funerals, weddings, support for lybian rebeles, support for the KSA, support for Isreal apartheid, support for hell south african one as well, tho that one is not ongoing i mean thats only on the foriegn sphere, on the domestic, the continuing incarceration of a chunk of the black population, the continuing killing of them by police, the awful treatment of its native people all those combined make it not only moral. but an imperative
deletedalmost 7 years
also yea systematic oppression literally comes from the government. people wouldnt think the way they do if the ruling class and those otherwise in power didnt tell them to
deletedalmost 7 years
mutie the fact you have to upvote a troll in order to disagree with my points instead of bothering to actually watch the material i linked shows that you dont know what youre talking about
I think I glimpsed a comment where someone claimed oppression stemmed from the people and not the government, but last I checked the government makes the laws heyoooo
yes obviously allende was wrongfully ousted with support from the us government but how does that translate into we need a violent overthrow of the us government
i would also say that while allende faced opposition, chile millitary did not have the biggest spending like america does and chiles police wasnt a militirized killing force like america, and those are two of the most reactonaries intitutions in america and on chile
thats crap, keynesism as a economics model is just to fix the problem of effective demmand and on the "equality for everyone is shittiness, for everyone" both of the countries who had a least a veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy backwards manufacturing/industrial system who had socialist govs, mao's china and lenin's ussr had an icrease in quality of life
Most of his stuff wasnt even implemented, or implemented properly.
He had a lot of the same agreements with marx on the destructive tendencies of capitalism. So he wanted to implement more infastructure and social programs to aid the people and prevent them from turning to fascism or communism.
They ended up just realizing that tgey could take out this money and just give infastructure to the top. Which is literally the opposite of what he wanted.
Something you dont get. Is that countries that already have, have no reason to destroy everything.
Why would the people in the US want to lower themsleves to be equal to haiti or costa rica?
Your equalitity for everyone, is shittiness for everyone. Everyone has an interest in having people below them if theyre already on top.
the only "sucessful" democratic "marxist" "revolution" was allende and that last 3 years before reactonaries TOOK UP ARMS and ousted the gov the only other case is the sandinistas and they were imbedded in a civil war afterwards because guess what happens
you know how democracy works right? if the majority of the population is in support of communism, than the people will elect those who are in favor of it to the government and will work to establish it. if your goal is to eradicate capitalism through the use of the majority then violence is unnecessary
lol when has that worked?
idk maybe when gay marriage was made legal nationwide for example
breh did u ignore when i said the thing about the shift of social dynamics lol