Even if you want to go with the uptick of fascism and white nationalism. Attacking them doesn't help your cause. All it does is give them more ammunition to say, "look how crazy the left has become".
One of the funny things is you guys fail to do is understand correlation vs causation. "After Trump won the white house, hate crimes raised."
This could also do with the fact with the high increase of terrorism in western countries in the last few years. Saying that its the west's fault for not being inclusive enough and that we should all just come together. Then terrorism will stop; Is extremely naive and counter intuitive.
I'm not saying that hate crimes of any sort should ever happen, they shouldn't, nor should certain people be barred from entering. But the liberal apology tour for other groups and just blaming the west and white people, is part of the cause for the rise of "white nationalism".
For the liberals having such a high college graduate segment, it's really sad how naive their world view is.
im talking about rojava ffs, R-O-J-A-V-A, noun, kurdish, meaning west, de facto adminstrative region of northern syria, being bombed by assad and turkey, majority kurdish, with a assyrian, yazidi and arab minorities. kurds = muslims
I don't think 100% capitalism is right, that just creates where businesses control everything. There has to be some checks.
But capitalism is currently working in all the western countries. There has never been a time where communism worked properly despite being tried over centuries.
let me think of the most feminist region in the world, what about a region where there is a regular committe to decide laws with all members of the community, and another where only women can join and the all women commite can veto all decisions by the regular commitee, that seems pretty feminist, hmm what religion r they, oh thats right f*cking muslims in syria
that's true, a lot of the social law comes from that. although of course, you can't put specific laws in a vacuum - a lot of muslims interpret social laws about women the same way that christians tend to interpret laws about women in the OT - they don't apply anymore, or they were the "relic of the times".
I've seen it a lot where they debate and when the veil and having to cover or get stoned is brought up they say it's not in the Quran. A lot of their social laws is based off the hadith.
oh how can ppl elect their own officials, u need god to lead u through ur king, democacy cant work these peasants r just gonna always elect themselves a dicatator they r too dumb, oh u will never be able to defeat the nobility they have god on their side
tbh regardless of whether or not you think communism is possible, i find it so odd that people willingly defend capitalism, given that the situation it has caused is awful and has led to an absurd amount of inequality. it's so depressing to have the mindset that mass inequality and class warfare is "just the way things are".
okay, i agree that it can be interperted badly, but i would also say that the majority of people i've seen who try to pick a fight against islam have very little idea what they are talking about, and don't understand the historical context behind any verse they quote.
yes rojava is non existent as r the zapatistas, lmao
what about the first french republic, they went capitalist, reign of terror and fell into dicatorship, that proves capitalism cant work, cause it fell, so did the weimar republic, IT CANT WORK lmao
the idea that even if it failed everytime it cant work its so flawed, why arent we in feudalism if the republican expirement fell in the first try?
I never said it was evil, I said it can be interpreted into a militant ideology. I have glanced through it.
Also a lot of their cultural stuff regarding women isn't even in the Quran it's in the Judith. Which they like to not talk about when they're debating in western countries.
Then the other societies you listed don't exist anymore. Because they were over thrown by something more stable. Classes and certain social rules make countries stronger and give them the ability to grow.
Point to a large country where no classes or state can survive without going hungry or being over thrown. Point to more evidence that capitalism is less stable. You can do neither of these
btw, you didn't answer my question - have you read the quran or the sunnah? it's fine if you didn't, but it bothers me when people act like an authority on islam because they read "10 VERSES THAT PROVE ISLAM IS EVIL" on some clickbait site, which tends to happen quite often.
also not at all strawman when i say the free territory of ukraine and u just point to modern day ukraine or how i specificly said zapatista and u point to whole mexico
