Even if you want to go with the uptick of fascism and white nationalism. Attacking them doesn't help your cause. All it does is give them more ammunition to say, "look how crazy the left has become".
One of the funny things is you guys fail to do is understand correlation vs causation. "After Trump won the white house, hate crimes raised."
This could also do with the fact with the high increase of terrorism in western countries in the last few years. Saying that its the west's fault for not being inclusive enough and that we should all just come together. Then terrorism will stop; Is extremely naive and counter intuitive.
I'm not saying that hate crimes of any sort should ever happen, they shouldn't, nor should certain people be barred from entering. But the liberal apology tour for other groups and just blaming the west and white people, is part of the cause for the rise of "white nationalism".
For the liberals having such a high college graduate segment, it's really sad how naive their world view is.
lets say i own this land, i got it cause im cool af, and the king gave it to me, coolio, i decide to work it myself, i drain the swamps and cut the wild grass and take care of the land, coolio now i have a farm, i plant things and i get things i store some, i eat some, i die, my kids get the farm and the stored, coolio
im a cool guy too, king gave me a land, zzz im lazy lets put a sign that says if u work in this land u will not have to pay me for 5 years then i want 70% of what u make! phase out >be a peasent >hungry munchie, need food! >my friend tried to level land without permission, head was on spike >guess i cant work for myself if i wanna live >see the sign >ok i guess >physicly drain the swamp, and get the land ready for farm >work hard >pass 10 years >die >be his kids >now u have to work and give 70% of everything u produce >next gen >have nothing passed from ur parents, and have to work the land as a child phase in landlord, i died already, be my 2nd generation kids >never worked >get food for free, while peasents starve >be happy
deletedover 7 years
but why does wealth have to be some tangible resource like potatoes? wealth is how much happiness and love u have in your life :-)
deletedover 7 years
You're frustratingly stupid, it's like trying to communicate with some anarcho-xxerox
me: i suppose u dont have to argue things if u just say taht they r copy pasted
you:i agree
me: learn sarcasm
you: i write fanfics
me: u r gay
deletedover 7 years
Your metaphors are so f*cking stupid
What if the grandpa trades that potato in exchange for 1 strawberry a year for 20 years but dies on year 5, is it suddenly "stealing" or whatever you want to call it if the man's son plans on collecting the strawberries owed?
did this kids parents physicly worked that capital? that land, or those machines or did they collect the produce of others and called it their own, lets say i plant a potato and more potatos grow and i get thses potatos, i eat some in life and die, my kid gets the rest of the potatos! ok! now suppose instead someguy gets 70% of my potatos, and i eat with my kid the other 30% in life, i die my kid has nothing that guys kid has stuff, im not opposing the workers passing the capital they produced to their children, i oppose people giving sh1t they took from workers cause his grandfather started some lemon stand or whatever
deletedover 7 years
you: X is wrong and bad
me: you don't understand X
you: I know I don't, but here are more copy pasted arguments as to why X is wrong and bad
deletedover 7 years
Why should I, or anyone else even read what you have to say when you self admittedly don't understand what you're arguing against?
lmao calvinism is stronk, when u claim ur system is meritocratic but u literally have monarquies of capital
yes, well i suppose that's because u r talking about how to manage capial, while all capital is labor, and all labor under capitalism is exploitation, and then there is the fact that one of the votes r either burocratic things or just deciding to pay executives wich really r what builds a company that combined with the classic calvin of these workers who work my capital and do all the work could never do my job of voting on things, cause i own stocks means im smarter than my workers and literally god favours me
deletedover 7 years
ok. people should be allowed to spend their money on what they want lol, and if they want to leave their money to their children then they should be allowed to do so.
I don't have parents that are going to leave me millions, but I'm not complaining about it just because some other kid is more fortunate
deletedover 7 years
That's not a rhetorical question either, I am genuinely asking how you think you'll be perceived when you just copy paste more random things you found online thinking that it somehow dispells the notion that you don't understand how the things that you're arguing against even work
deletedover 7 years
Why are you being sarcastic when you blatantly don't understand the fundamentals of how businesses operate?
it must be exhausting to vote yes no or abstain with a tooltip on what u should vote, i retract stockholders r the hardest workers of them all bless their souls! lmao ya its not at all like wealth is getting stagnated to 1910-1950, with social mobility going down, and 8 ppl owning 50% of all wealth, stop this prejudice on rich ppl, they work so hard to get out of their mom's and be given stocks when their daddy dies
deletedover 7 years
i dont say that to disagree with whatever ur point is or agree with anyone elses
im just pointing out that u keep rattling on and on about big bidness and people wit da muneys being evil and its f*cking weird
deletedover 7 years
I'm gonna be honest here, I get the impression that some of you (mostly somethingwhatever) doesn't actually understand some very basic, core concepts of how businesses operate. Things like how CEO's or board member's obtain their positions or how the decision process of a company actually works.
for reference on just one aspect of what im talking about lol
2017 THE HOME DEPOT, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(spliced image put together from my email history)
CEO's are important, but does that justify them having an increasingly larger and larger share of the pie? Do remember that CEO's are important for the organizational part of a company, but when it comes to real output, a lot of it is created from the labor of your average workman.
how did I strawman someones point? Was matt's (and too many other's that Ive seen recently) point not that having to work in order to survive is like slavery?
haha ITS NOT AT ALL LIKE THE CEOS WERE GETTING BONUSES WHY THEIR COMPANIES WERE GETTING LITERALLY SO BROKE THEY HAD TO BE BAILED OUT HAHAHHAAH, IM A MADMAN HAHAHAHA
