Back to Epicmafia

Mod Moderation System

almost 8 years

There needs to be a system in place that would allow mods to be properly measured in there ability to handle reports fairly and properly. I very much doubt that there is some one who consistently looks over every report and evaluates if mods are making the correct verdicts.

Why not implement a way to allow the community to "vote" on the end report verdicts and let the players decide if they believe the decision is fair or not. This would prevent any sort of mod abuse and allows the people who run the site an easy way to evaluate wether or not the mods are doing there job well. This also would be helpful for mods in the appeal process, as mods would be able to read the results and if the overwhelming majority of people believe the verdict given was incorrect, they know that the report needs to be reassessed.

One possible way to do this would be to implement a poll after a report decision has been made. Mods would still have the ultimate power in the final decision, but at least this way we give the community an easy route to help improve and monitor the site.

Do you believe this is good idea?
37
No
16
Yes
almost 8 years

ReverseNinthMushroom says


Stiffy says


ReverseNinthMushroom says


Soluciones says

stop arguing he must show proof or it's useless


I showed two examples of proof firstly he admitted to 10% of verdicts being wrong, then he backtracked and made up an excuse instead of admitting fault, hes a mod so hes a person who would look at ur reports.


He literally didn't "admit 10% of verdicts are wrong", for starters he was talking about AFTER a mistake was made, maybe 10% of the time it's not fixed. So 99% of reports are mistake-free. Of that 1% maybe 10% (Rutab's generous number) are not fixed. That's not 10% of reports being wrong. That's 0.1% of reports that went wrong not being fixed.

Reverse you need to take a break. The poor horse is ground meat at this point, please stop beating it.


he said 1 IN 10 reports arent handled properly any way you look at it thats 10% of reports that are wrong.


Please relearn high school math, and/or reading comprehension.
almost 8 years
he's one of the gayhaters
deletedalmost 8 years

JeffreyAaron says

Sorry, not Catholic.


Dang, I thought that was a pretty likely bet
deletedalmost 8 years
Rutab and Amor are like the Future Farmers of America kids and they just don't understand why there is so much drug use at our school
almost 8 years
Sorry, not Catholic.
deletedalmost 8 years
Click the above hidden post for a sick backhanded compliment that rutab didn't like
deletedalmost 8 years
I think that it's cool that JeffreyAaron can say hail mary's in more than one language while he gets railed by his boyfriend!
almost 8 years
I don't believe there is.
almost 8 years
I wonder if there's a Spanish mafia site
almost 8 years
Because the site is in English and it was a lapse in thinking to post in Spanish.
almost 8 years

JeffreyAaron says


Blister says

one problem: who mods the mod-moderators?


I'll take this burden upon me.


Why did u change it from Spanish to English
deletedalmost 8 years

Escurai says

The mod-mod-moderators


who mods the modmen?
almost 8 years

Blister says

one problem: who mods the mod-moderators?


I'll take this burden upon me.
almost 8 years
now my comment is split by a page and Rutab's it looks like it's for another thread fk off I was getting at least two up clicks on that
almost 8 years
The mod-mod-moderators
almost 8 years
Mushroom the best possible answer to your troubles is that you and/or any of your friends could manually check our reports

There's nothing wrong with that
deletedalmost 8 years
one problem: who mods the mod-moderators?
deletedalmost 8 years
genius. simply a genius idea.
almost 8 years
I know I've been half-trolling you but in all seriousness you're deluded and the only one who is closed-minded here so yeah
almost 8 years

Rutab says

LOL

Sounds like you want to lead a coup d'etat right now


No I just want you to provide plausible reasoning to back up your arguments.
almost 8 years
Oh, and my "cronies" are the first people to scrutinize us when we do something wrong, fyi
almost 8 years
LOL

Sounds like you want to lead a coup d'etat right now
almost 8 years

snoodledoodledoo says

It's already based on mod friends, this will make it just based on friends.

Anyway who cares if the mods or good or not, they've sucked for years and the sites still fun


There are what 20 mods? Thousands of users. The ability to abuse becomes much harder the more people there are.
almost 8 years
It's already based on mod friends, this will make it just based on friends.

Anyway who cares if the mods or good or not, they've sucked for years and the sites still fun
almost 8 years

LazyYami says


ReverseNinthMushroom says

I don"t care if theres a poll or not, you guys just haven't given any actual valid information as to why it would fail, as your entire argument relies on the fact of "the community cant handle it" which is an opinionated statement and unless you provide real evidence as to why the entire community not just a few select people couldn't handle it is baseless.

All I said was there needs to be some sort of way that we can hold mods accountable, I simply offered 1 suggestion.



LazyYami says

Honestly the only problem w/ this system is how bias communities can be. Chances are that if this system ever became a thing, there'll be at least one person that community is against and will blindly vote against. The only way I could really see this working is if there was some type of honor system to help prevent people from saying 'this deserves a vio' then later on for the same report saying 'no vio needed' just because it's a person they don't like.


How is my post not a fail point in this system?


Your ignoring the fact that mods can also be biased and there needs to be a way for them to be held In check, people are biased not communities.