Back to Forum Games

Forum Mafia 19: Forbidden Actions

about 8 years

Welcome to Forum Mafia 19: Forbidden Actions!

Game is over. Ended on Day 5

Mafia wins! This game was ranked.

The mastermind's behind this game are Gerry, Mori and myself.

The game will be played like any other Forum Mafia game, with one twist! Every player will be given an action pregame. If the action they are given is performed, they will be Killed from the game, with their forbidden action being shown afterward. More information will be given under Rules.

I. The Schedule:

72 Hour Days. 24 Hour Nights

  • If you don't submit actions by the deadline I will consider you taking no action.

II. The Set Up:

  • There is no "possible roles list". I promise not to get too crazy.

  • Mafia will have Day chat. And will know each other's Forbidden Actions

  • You will get an Alignment PM. Town or Mafia and your alignment will not change.

Sample Role PM:

Welcome to Forum Mafia 19, papuito!

Your role is Vanilla Townie, you are sided with the Town.

Your only power in this game is your voice and your vote. Good luck.

Your forbidden action is: Using pictures or gifs in any of your posts

YOU CANNOT SHARE THIS FORBIDDEN ACTION WITH ANYONE

You win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one town-aligned player is alive.

Mafia Sample:

Welcome to Forum Mafia 19, papuito!

Your role is Mafia Goon, you are sided with the Mafia.

You are partners with (Player name) and (Player name). You share a day talk here (url here).

Your forbidden action is: Using pictures or gifs in any of your posts

YOU CAN ONLY SHARE YOUR FORBIDDEN ACTION WITH MAFIA MEMBERS.

Each night, one of you or your partners may perform the factional kill. You may kill and perform your role action during the same night.

You win if at least one member of your group is alive and all other players are dead (or if nothing can prevent the same)

III. The Rules:

Forum Mafia 19 Rules:

http://pastebin.com/kEUDw4T9 (The only modification is that mafia may kill and perform role action in the same night. Only 1 mafia member commits the kill.)

As explained earlier, there will be forbidden actions. YOU CANNOT SHARE YOUR FORBIDDEN ACTION. If found to, you will be mod killed. If you commit the forbidden action, you will be killed from the game. You may speculate forbidden actions of others within the game. If asked whether your forbidden action is something, you cannot confirm or deny. You can also not soft or hint as to what your forbidden action is.

We also will be strict about ISP and replacements. If you think for any reason you MAY have to be replaced, do not sign up. We also reserve the right to deny anyone from joining, if we believe you will troll, isp, sub.

IV. Votes:

  • Votes must be made in the format Vote: Playername. Bolding is done using the tags [b][/b].

  • I will not take any other type of vote. If I can't tell who you're voting, I won't take it.

MOD NOTE Mori will be giving out a token prize to a player from each alignment who the hosts determined played best.

V. Game Log:

XXNicoleXX: Vanilla Townie. Lynched Day 1.

Her forbidden action: Town NLing any day.

Damned: Vanilla Townie. Killed Night 1.

His forbidden action: Double Posting and editing post.

yoyo200900: Vanilla Townie. Lynched Day 2

His forbidden action: Any Day lasting less than 36 hours.

VI. Subs:

yoyo200900 subs in for Ideal

deletedabout 8 years
I'm going to saw off both my legs if this keeps going on.
deletedabout 8 years
Vote Ideal

This is a really good place to start with all your sideline comments and not really doing anything
Himiko Impoe and Retti all feel like town to me
(Himiko and Impoe more so then Retti) I like Himkiko's comment on Retti's filler post it's like saying a lot but when you really look at the post nothing of real value is in it. I don't really understand the huge bw that's starting on him though.
about 8 years

Himiko says

I'll be honest, I don't understand Retti's logic at all, which makes me want to scumread them, because it feels like they're grasping for the straws. Like, I don't see why they're being so nit-picky at Kassidy, and they even misread. I think a small misread is okay, but mafia tends to jump at the chance to fos a person. Tbh, more clarification would help.


This was your initial fos.

I assumed by "his whole thing about NG codes" you meant the WHOLE thing about ng codes, not the one thing where he said it was a fancy way to say "restrictions" (which is presumably what they're called in most games of forum mafia where they exist) that tied into something that wasn't stating the obvious at all
deletedabout 8 years
Shh. You're both town and I hardclaimed. I don't really have the patience to try and walk everyone through this game.
about 8 years
just a btw, impoetic would question you either way from what i find. shes probably town and she needs to stop making it look like shes defending the likely mafia

ill probably end up lynching retti, theres only 2 people that havent talked yet (shears and nicole) and i don't even care
about 8 years

Retti says

I hard-claim JoAT by the way.


this was really unneeded
deletedabout 8 years
"On that note, Retti's whole thing about forbidden actions being restrictions just felt like straight up filler meant to appear as thoughtful town." That is... exactly what I said, Impoetic. I...
deletedabout 8 years
I claim fool.
deletedabout 8 years
I hard-claim JoAT by the way.
deletedabout 8 years
The more this drags on the more I feel the argument will devolve into ad naseum, and that it's probably TvT. I didn't ask impoetic to defend me and I was still waiting to see what PonyLove said, but I don't think Himiko as mafia would keep trying to explain herself to this point, even if I feel it's unnecessary.
about 8 years
Hey so who wants to lynch retti
deletedabout 8 years
But in my experience, people who tend to jump at someone's defense despite not being sure of their read on them, almost are always mafia. Why? Because I don't feel like town would waste their time trying to criticize someone's read, especially if they don't townread that person. There's much better things they can do with their time. Also, the only other reason to criticize someone's read is that the person is trying to show other people that the person is mafia. Is that your intention? Because if so, you should clarify.
about 8 years

Damned says

Vote Retti


cough are you willing to explain your vote so i might have reason to join you maybe

or are you just going to uh
about 8 years

Himiko says

Not only that, your reasoning for thinking my fos doesn't make sense is kinda weak and subjective.

If you're gonna criticize my logic, explain why my logic doesn't work.

And for one last time I will explain what I meant, because it seems even when trying to show me how, you still don't get it.

My read has nothing to do with the people he was responding to.

I've already read it all, and there was no need to say "Forbidden actions are restrictions", because that is an obvious statement, and it'd be okay if that statement took up a small fraction of his post, but it was basically half his post.

Maybe it is a weak fos on my part, but it's something that I didn't like, and I honestly don't see how you can see that as totally not filler.


Except that's not what you actually said. It's also a very weak fos because stating the obvious really isn't a scumtell, especially/at least from someone like Retti. I'm going to quote the posts I was looking at.
deletedabout 8 years
Vote Retti
deletedabout 8 years
I've been explaining.... Lol.
about 8 years

Himiko says

What's the point of attacking someone's reads if you aren't sure of the person's alignment in the first place?


obviously because your read's explanation didn't hold, and I don't know your alignment either.

What's the point in spending paragraphs explaining reads if you don't want to convince others?
deletedabout 8 years
Not only that, your reasoning for thinking my fos doesn't make sense is kinda weak and subjective.

If you're gonna criticize my logic, explain why my logic doesn't work.

And for one last time I will explain what I meant, because it seems even when trying to show me how, you still don't get it.

My read has nothing to do with the people he was responding to.

I've already read it all, and there was no need to say "Forbidden actions are restrictions", because that is an obvious statement, and it'd be okay if that statement took up a small fraction of his post, but it was basically half his post.

Maybe it is a weak fos on my part, but it's something that I didn't like, and I honestly don't see how you can see that as totally not filler.
deletedabout 8 years
I'm gonna wait until Impoetic, Retti, and Himiko go to bed before I start to actually try to play. lol
about 8 years

UltraAug says

hey everyone im here

were in autowin already good job yall

lemme reread how tf did yall write so much already

Oh and damned

on a scale of 1-10, bleach?


damned avoided the question
deletedabout 8 years
What's the point of attacking someone's reads if you aren't sure of the person's alignment in the first place?
about 8 years
OH MY GOD PLEASE SLOW DOWN I CAN'T KEEP UP
about 8 years

Himiko says

Impoetic, you're really not understanding my reads, and I'm already getting frustrated at explaining. It has nothing to do with his fos's, it's the fact he explained something pretty obvious: the obvious being forbidden actions are restrictions, which did nothing to help town. I don't see how you see that as not filler.

But actually, I don't see why you're adamant about coming to Retti's defense, which makes me think there's a chance you might be maf trying to get brownie points by defending someone.


somehow I knew someone would say that but I didn't think it'd be you.

FIrst of all: Retti was responding to other people who were talking about forbidden actions by saying there was no point in discussing forbidden actions, thereby putting an end to the mechanics discussion which was not really productive and kind of antitown. So no, he wasn't just "stating the obvious."

Reread his posts. Reread your points. I don't know what you're thinking, but your logic is incoherent to me when taken side-by-side with retti's posts.

I have never once said retti was town. I think he's null. Ergo, I'm not defending him; I'm attacking your reads because they don't work in my eyes.
deletedabout 8 years
Also, you can see that as quick to jump to conclusions, but all I'm doing is outting my thoughts. My reads might stay the same, they might not, it depends how people choose to respond and their later participation.
deletedabout 8 years
Then I'd like to hear PonyLove's opinion on your behavior before I make a judgment call. You really should relax though.