also catbae played like 40 games on jan2.0 i wouldn't consider that a large sample size. if you check his top 5 most played setups they're all balanced setups other than FJ 2.0
shucks says i think you can carry yourself on jan 2.0 but after a while you'll get enough towns that it'll balance your stats out to 55% at minimum
being luck based would make it harder to ensure a high winning percentage though, wouldn't it?
jan 2.0 really isn't that hard to get a high win% on, it's incredibly luck-based and pretty much every game depends on a 50/50 cop cc battle just like FP/Classic mafia
i think fading cheated but i've only heard from word of mouth
yeah there is so much that can go wrong on it that's outside of your control.
fading had a 66% w/r on false which was post-2011. idk if he cheated on that, it's hard to tell with that dude
Jan 2.0 is incredibly, incredibly hard to post 64% on over a large sample size, I guessed that you were trolling before but that basically confirms it.
catbae was also skewed - he played a bunch of jan 2.0, alcoways (basically a classic mafia variant), fancy pants
when you have 500,000 points across all of your accounts like soda does, you're bound to win a few trophies just out of sample size
Brown's post was insightful. I think I playstyle varied wildly depending on my role.
I mean, while I said winrate isn't a great indication, it's still really useful as a hard measure of how much you win.
PE, veiexku, soda won a bunch of trophies and i don't think they're that impressive.
you can make an argument for soben being overrated but gira is easily a top-5 mafia player
gira and soben both won many trophies and had more than one hall of fame accounts when epicmafia was at its most competitive
gira and soben were overrated and mediocre
deleted about 8 years
Tatami says to me, that is the right way so yeah
Tatami says i don't think any post that long about mafia can be "good"
CAPS LOCK, loud, emotional!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TIL the skills needed to be good at mafia
it's tough to say. There were a lot of players who could whoop my butt, although some of them were objectively not that great, but simply matched up well against me.
The point is you called it "fundamental" which implies a "right" way. The words you were looking for were likely "logical", "thoughtful", etc.
deleted about 8 years
but if we look at it like the spectrums as you put it then yes youre quite good at what you do
