← Back to Off Topic

Cheater Database

groundhogdayabout 10 years ago

gold hearts or pre-gold heart implementation only

hi. this is a thread. it's hard to keep up with who's cheated so i'm making a list. i'll add a few names that come to mind but if you've cheated please post in this thread and i'll add you. you can also post the name of someone else who has cheated. i want to make this comprehensive so please don't hold anything back

current list: Satan, Slow, Gerry, abc, Calvin, Edark, Shamzy, Devante, Togepi, JimSpermWorm, leo, Blister, Zhuorb, sineadiio, prevail, Anthony, poser, Delicate, Jill, AlSharpton, Rednose, Weareking, DrJackShephard, Kerry, LaurieRose, RoughNightBro, Acintris, xJade, Antidote, caroline, CoryInDaHouse, battletechies, mtvesuvius, Kelly, WhiteWind, kassavetova, grandukeofowls, arlian, kawarimi, Rawrwarrior, Zwink, D3xTr0m3th0rph4n, Private, vedarshi, Wonderland, Betrayal, Arcbell, Heisenberg, lumice, expose, bluefish, ScubaSteve, b0oty, pranay7744, Mori, Nessamaria, happyowns, riotkiller, matt12, betmen, erica, kassa, BearGuru, cirno, Fruitoftheloom, arianna, charley, Slow, PetermhShini, JepoJ, Tigerawr, Misslongstockings, Madhatter48, Konata, Female, Shrub, Minecraftfangirlftw, BigBadBoy, Jono69, NeverMaf, Body/AdBlock, Warbird1500, Ookkies/Euniit group, ruse group, LaxBro69, Monkanej, LeeSin, GoldenPony, Ohaialex, Templar1990, Discordia, Terra, ling, futureblargg, Ethereal, RAWR, seanman, johnreid, anteup, Kradar, Kyledemort64, thEye, drysc, shivv, endorphins, rawrr, mau, fading, ordelman, inspector, TimTebow, data, noshirtman, SarahTwilight

future cheaters: totori, ThirdAug, Himiki, Gerry

Game Board
Satan
Cheater of the Week, Fifth Week
Gerry
Cheater of the Week, First and Fourth Weeks
Hibiki
Cheater of the Week, Third Week
Edark
Cheater of the Week, Second Week
deletedabout 10 years ago
Zhuorb
Whatever you say, rednose
when people have skyped both me and rednose before and realized we aren't the same person
Edarkabout 10 years ago
leo
Edark
leo
edark that's all fine and dandy but when you have actual teenagers on this site

( me, for example )

we might want you to be careful about modding a pedophile rather than going 'they've chaaaaaaaaaaaanged they looked at hentai but they chaaaaaaaaaaanged'

i personally do not believe petri was a creeper pedo because they were in contact with someone who knew i was 15. that doesnt mean there shouldn't be some wariness in the community, and you should take the proper time to address the problem rather than saying the evidence presented is wrong or doesn't matter.
I understand your concern but there is more evidence supporting that she does infact not act upon her "urges"(remember literally no one actually knows 100% if she is a pedophile to begin with, we're just assuming here) and the most contact you will even get with her is verdicts in reports. Literally nothing more.
not what im saying. what im concerned about is that she has been elected a mod with no worries whatsoever from the mod team.
You wouldnt know, but you're very wrong.
Harroldabout 10 years ago
Calvin
stuffl
Look, when push comes to shove, I'm not enough of a cúnt to think people aren't capable of change. If I made the wrong call and something happened, well, it would be an absolute travesty, but I made the call based on the fact that not everything from your history will stay with you.
Edarkabout 10 years ago
wait you're talking about arcbell lol
leoabout 10 years ago
Edark
leo
edark that's all fine and dandy but when you have actual teenagers on this site

( me, for example )

we might want you to be careful about modding a pedophile rather than going 'they've chaaaaaaaaaaaanged they looked at hentai but they chaaaaaaaaaaanged'

i personally do not believe petri was a creeper pedo because they were in contact with someone who knew i was 15. that doesnt mean there shouldn't be some wariness in the community, and you should take the proper time to address the problem rather than saying the evidence presented is wrong or doesn't matter.
I understand your concern but there is more evidence supporting that she does infact not act upon her "urges"(remember literally no one actually knows 100% if she is a pedophile to begin with, we're just assuming here) and the most contact you will even get with her is verdicts in reports. Literally nothing more.
not what im saying. what im concerned about is that she has been elected a mod with no worries whatsoever from the mod team.
Zhuorbabout 10 years ago
I for one can't remember the last time I PMd a moderator for help
Edarkabout 10 years ago
moon
I think it's a little worse to have someone modded that's hacked accounts and grabbed user's passwords to use elsewhere but that's just me.
Exactly. I would 100% prefer if people actually spoke about that went down than alledged pedophilic activities.
deletedabout 10 years ago
moon
I think it's a little worse to have someone modded that's hacked accounts and grabbed user's passwords to use elsewhere but that's just me.
Simsabout 10 years ago
moon
I think it's a little worse to have someone modded that's hacked accounts and grabbed user's passwords to use elsewhere but that's just me.
jackabout 10 years ago
moon
I think it's a little worse to have someone modded that's hacked accounts and grabbed user's passwords to use elsewhere but that's just me.
legit, why is arcbell a mod. you can't possibly bs your way out of that one
ArieIabout 10 years agoedited
because as multiple people have explained before, new users tend to look to mods for help and as a role model for appropriate site behavior. personally, i would think a trusting 14 y/o pming a pedophile and becoming friends with them under the pretense that nobody in their right minds would mod someone who wants to screw children would be an abhorrent thought.
leoabout 10 years ago
Harrold
leo
Harrold
Calvin
]you realize you're making this person a representative of your website, someone who young users like look up to and ask for advice and pm them about the site and sh*t? I realize the scrutiny is way too severe than it needs to be, it really is but that doesn't mean what these guys are saying is wrong
You also realise that my interactions with the person did not draw any similarities to what happened 5 years ago, in vague context? You also realise that I'd already given the person the okay before anything came to surface regarding their history? If you actually read what I'm saying then you'll realise what you're saying isn't valid. I never said I disregarded anything, I said she was supervised. I was satisfied with her behaviour under such supervision.
thank you for at least talking about it. however, what will you do if an underage minor actually does end up feeling threatened by petri modding?

i and sonrio don't really care, but there could be other minors on this site who say otherwise.
Had I not known about some vague Skype logs which occurred 4-5 years prior, then this would not have ever entered my mind. I'm not saying it's moot, I'm just saying that the behaviour she exhibited whilst working under me was by no means threatening. That being said, to answer your question directly, I would have felt distraught.
but would you remove her from her modding position?

also, universe, you're asking a minor why we might be offended when a pedophile, someone who has sexual desires for children, is in a position of power.
moonabout 10 years ago
I think it's a little worse to have someone modded that's hacked accounts and grabbed user's passwords to use elsewhere but that's just me.
Edarkabout 10 years ago
leo
edark that's all fine and dandy but when you have actual teenagers on this site

( me, for example )

we might want you to be careful about modding a pedophile rather than going 'they've chaaaaaaaaaaaanged they looked at hentai but they chaaaaaaaaaaanged'

i personally do not believe petri was a creeper pedo because they were in contact with someone who knew i was 15. that doesnt mean there shouldn't be some wariness in the community, and you should take the proper time to address the problem rather than saying the evidence presented is wrong or doesn't matter.
I understand your concern but there is more evidence supporting that she does infact not act upon her "urges"(remember literally no one actually knows 100% if she is a pedophile to begin with, we're just assuming here) and the most contact you will even get with her is verdicts in reports. Literally nothing more.
deletedabout 10 years ago
Harrold
Calvin
]you realize you're making this person a representative of your website, someone who young users like look up to and ask for advice and pm them about the site and sh*t? I realize the scrutiny is way too severe than it needs to be, it really is but that doesn't mean what these guys are saying is wrong
You also realise that my interactions with the person did not draw any similarities to what happened 5 years ago, in vague context? You also realise that I'd already given the person the okay before anything came to surface regarding their history? If you actually read what I'm saying then you'll realise what you're saying isn't valid. I never said I disregarded anything, I said she was supervised. I was satisfied with her behaviour under such supervision.
i didn't mean you specifically, i meant like "you" in general
Harroldabout 10 years ago
leo
Harrold
Calvin
]you realize you're making this person a representative of your website, someone who young users like look up to and ask for advice and pm them about the site and sh*t? I realize the scrutiny is way too severe than it needs to be, it really is but that doesn't mean what these guys are saying is wrong
You also realise that my interactions with the person did not draw any similarities to what happened 5 years ago, in vague context? You also realise that I'd already given the person the okay before anything came to surface regarding their history? If you actually read what I'm saying then you'll realise what you're saying isn't valid. I never said I disregarded anything, I said she was supervised. I was satisfied with her behaviour under such supervision.
thank you for at least talking about it. however, what will you do if an underage minor actually does end up feeling threatened by petri modding?

i and sonrio don't really care, but there could be other minors on this site who say otherwise.
Had I not known about some vague Skype logs which occurred 4-5 years prior, then this would not have ever entered my mind. I'm not saying it's moot, I'm just saying that the behaviour she exhibited whilst working under me was by no means threatening. That being said, to answer your question directly, I would have felt distraught.
Hibikiabout 10 years ago
ArieI
yes, so far to our knowledge, petri hasnt acted on these urges, aside from loli. however, why would you put someone like that in a position of temptation?
i mean, i'm staying as neutral as ever, but how do u consider being an epicmafia moderator a position of temptation
Edarkabout 10 years ago
moon
I kinda agree with you edark about the alleged tendencies not being a valid reason to remove someone. But I think others said she posted it on the site before and exposed other people to it as the reason why she should be barred from modding and I agree w that.
Fair point and I understand that, just like I stated in my post. But as I think its too far to assume guilt when she never had displayed such behaviour.

ArieI
yes, so far to our knowledge, petri hasnt acted on these urges, aside from loli. however, why would you put someone like that in a position of temptation?
How is being a mod "a position of temptation"?
leoabout 10 years agoedited
Harrold
Calvin
]you realize you're making this person a representative of your website, someone who young users like look up to and ask for advice and pm them about the site and sh*t? I realize the scrutiny is way too severe than it needs to be, it really is but that doesn't mean what these guys are saying is wrong
You also realise that my interactions with the person did not draw any similarities to what happened 5 years ago, in vague context? You also realise that I'd already given the person the okay before anything came to surface regarding their history? If you actually read what I'm saying then you'll realise what you're saying isn't valid. I never said I disregarded anything, I said she was supervised. I was satisfied with her behaviour under such supervision.
thank you for at least talking about it. however, what will you do if a minor actually does end up feeling threatened by petri modding?

i and sonrio don't really care, but there could be other minors on this site who say otherwise.
Harroldabout 10 years ago
I honestly find it exasperating talking to people who can only interpret surface deep information.
UniversalStudiosabout 10 years ago
leo
edark that's all fine and dandy but when you have actual teenagers on this site

( me, for example )

we might want you to be careful about modding a pedophile rather than going 'they've chaaaaaaaaaaaanged they looked at hentai but they chaaaaaaaaaaanged'

i personally do not believe petri was a creeper pedo because they were in contact with someone who knew i was 15. that doesnt mean there shouldn't be some wariness in the community, and you should take the proper time to address the problem rather than saying the evidence presented is wrong or doesn't matter.
I don't get posts like these. Can anyone name the last time that giving someone mod powers subjected the site to a slew of sexual harassment complaints?
Zhuorbabout 10 years ago
Whatever you say, rednose
Harroldabout 10 years ago
Calvin
]you realize you're making this person a representative of your website, someone who young users like look up to and ask for advice and pm them about the site and sh*t? I realize the scrutiny is way too severe than it needs to be, it really is but that doesn't mean what these guys are saying is wrong
You also realise that my interactions with the person did not draw any similarities to what happened 5 years ago, in vague context? You also realise that I'd already given the person the okay before anything came to surface regarding their history? If you actually read what I'm saying then you'll realise what you're saying isn't valid. I never said I disregarded anything, I said she was supervised. I was satisfied with her behaviour under such supervision.
deletedabout 10 years ago
Zhuorb
Third4ug
BearGuru
Third4ug
Arcbell being a mod is the worst thing to happen to this website
arcbell was admin once
All jokes aside, i'm very glad i wasn't around during that time
yeah right
Do i sense sarcasm
moonabout 10 years ago
I kinda agree with you edark about the alleged tendencies not being a valid reason to remove someone. But I think others said she posted it on the site before and exposed other people to it as the reason why she should be barred from modding and I agree w that.