hi. this is a thread. it's hard to keep up with who's cheated so i'm making a list. i'll add a few names that come to mind but if you've cheated please post in this thread and i'll add you. you can also post the name of someone else who has cheated. i want to make this comprehensive so please don't hold anything back
i think it's more of an issue that somebody who was hijacking accounts, stealing passwords and hording personal information should not be given the chance to win everyone over.
i just meant bringing it up when preti ended up getting modded. unless you did w/ the other ppl complaining about role mod
I handled community backlash when people were appointed as role mods, so if you didn't read my take on it at that point in time, I find it exhausting repeating myself. I think I've been very transparent about everything over these past few pages.
I don't get what petricigy as a mod can do that petricigy as a user can not. If they wanted to target minors they would have done so by now, it's not like being a moderator gives you a special privilege to do it. Like honestly your argument couldn't be more wrong. Pushing for them to be demodded but still kept on the site will not stop them from doing "pedophilic" things. If anything them being a mod would actually keep that in check
i think i really disagree w the thing where community image/perception/whatever is disregarded in the decision making process of selecting a moderator and instead, looking at personal interactions had with them
w arcbell for instance, i really dont think it matters how much harry trusts him, bottom line, the community whos information arcbell has doesnt trust him and he has had massive push back so??? why does it make sense for him to be working for them??
You make a good point. I think, seeing as you mentioned him, regarding Arcbell, it's more the fact that because I believe that he will be reliable, I think giving him an opportunity to prove that to other people in hope of changing their minds is something I would advocate.
but why didn't you bring it up in the first place? do you think people weren't going to mention it?
i think i really disagree w the thing where community image/perception/whatever is disregarded in the decision making process of selecting a moderator and instead, looking at personal interactions had with them
w arcbell for instance, i really dont think it matters how much harry trusts him, bottom line, the community whos information arcbell has doesnt trust him and he has had massive push back so??? why does it make sense for him to be working for them??
You make a good point. I think, seeing as you mentioned him, regarding Arcbell, it's more the fact that because I believe that he will be reliable, I think giving him an opportunity to prove that to other people in hope of changing their minds is something I would advocate.
but why didn't you bring it up in the first place? do you think people weren't going to mention it?
i think i really disagree w the thing where community image/perception/whatever is disregarded in the decision making process of selecting a moderator and instead, looking at personal interactions had with them
w arcbell for instance, i really dont think it matters how much harry trusts him, bottom line, the community whos information arcbell has doesnt trust him and he has had massive push back so??? why does it make sense for him to be working for them??
You make a good point. I think, seeing as you mentioned him, regarding Arcbell, it's more the fact that because I believe that he will be reliable, I think giving him an opportunity to prove that to other people in hope of changing their minds is something I would advocate.