Epicmafia

deletedalmost 9 years

Very well, Devante, I'll amuse you.

Devante says

there was no logic behind it, that's my point

My point is that you're making some very bad assumptions.

Devante says

not only did you overstep your boundaries by going out of your way to dickaround and find some way to give vilden an hc vio to ban them from the forums for 6 months

lol

Devante says

you gloated about it afterwards.

I said they made terrible posts so I guess you can construe it as that. I don't like banning anyone regardless of who it is (See: first sentence of the post you're referring to)

Devante says

there's 0% chance anyone has ever been vio'd for calling seomeon challenged

Not in itself problematic.

Devante says

don't try to ullshit me for Tatami being a jackass and going out of his way to give vilden a vio.

I'd vio anyone else who did it in the same context, period. I think Vilden makes badposts but at the end of the day I'm here to have fun on epicmafia.com not ensure others can't have fun. I don't target anyone. An example of this is yesterday I almost didn't sustain the HC vio on Terry despite the fact that Terry is probably the person I complain about most on the site, having thrown against me and being outright racist and misogynist.

Well, okay, to be 100% completely honest, maybe not Harod. But everyone else.

krystal

almost 9 years

Devante says

so who is gonna reword the hc vio so it's known that if the person thinks you're implying something offensive it will also result in a vio

should just ne of the mods don't like you they will find any ways to ban you lol bye tatami reported vilden was tatami offended for calvin

deletedalmost 9 years

My brain could easily beat up your brain. You type gibberish so often trying to sound like an intellectual it's laughable

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

harodihg says

if you ever feel yourself aligning with Zovea you should probably reassess your stance

Yea being emotional and stupid is far superior to being rational.

Devante

almost 9 years

so who is gonna reword the hc vio so it's known that if the person thinks you're implying something offensive it will also result in a vio

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

eris says

Why do I feel like I'm mostly on the same side as Zovea in this topic what is this fresh hell

Because censorship is stupid, the mods a hypocritical and stupid, and none of this matters so why not post to keep myself entertained?

krystal

almost 9 years

Eris your gfs vio was BS if blister didn't get HC, it's because no mod is native or proudly native so they don't care

deletedalmost 9 years

if you ever feel yourself aligning with Zovea you should probably reassess your stance

deletedalmost 9 years

Why do I feel like I'm mostly on the same side as Zovea in this topic what is this fresh hell

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

krystalk says

F I N A L L Y someone gets it

To you two I say what makes you think you can walk out in the middle of a frozen lake in March, jump up and down, and live?

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

ZeroFurrbone says

What are we arguing anymore?

You claim to have been on this site in '08 and think a 23 page thread would remain on topic?

krystal

almost 9 years

UniversalStudios says

krystalk says

@kerry yes but Calvin set the example that it was okay but if ou don't see that then im not gonna argue

Not sure why people are struggling to understand this, you can't let people say this over the course of 3 days then ban someone for it out of spite because you believed them to be acting out of spite.

F I N A L L Y someone gets it

MeetTerry

almost 9 years

can we get rid of hima/haze already

she literally does no work and she blatantly abuses her mod actions

ZeroFurrbone

almost 9 years

People having control over lucid should not happen

deletedalmost 9 years

Kerry says

you can't break a law expecting to get away with it because someone else implied it was okay or got away with it...

Rules only matter if they're enforced, and when that enforcement is done unevenly, it doesn't exactly fill the userbase with confidence and they're correct to be angry.

Also if they really wanted to get a mod removed or punished it only takes a few emails from a few users or just one from the right user to Lucid. I recall Dave getting removed pretty easily the last time.

ZeroFurrbone

almost 9 years

What are we arguing anymore?

deletedalmost 9 years

also mod harodihg

deletedalmost 9 years

BillStickers says

it would be really easy to just rewrite the rule so it's both clear to players and more easily moderatable but i'm really happy that everyone involved agrees that drama is the more fun way to handle things

i think the problem with that is that when people see how stupid the rules are they'll think that the rules are stupid

deletedalmost 9 years

Do you hear that Lucid? Im strong arming you

deletedalmost 9 years

Hey, make me a mod and I'll act as a spokesperson and make this mess go away.

deletedalmost 9 years

BillStickers says

Fam says

BillStickers says

it would be really easy to just rewrite the rule so it's both clear to players and more easily moderatable but i'm really happy that everyone involved agrees that drama is the more fun way to handle things

Getting people upset is way better then letting it be organized and understandable

this but unironically

I'm not being ironic though, i like seeing people being visually angry in their posts. I like to think of them panicly writing a response then deleting it 10 times to make sure they write that proper burn to the mods. "heh that'll show them"

BillStickers

almost 9 years

Fam says

BillStickers says

it would be really easy to just rewrite the rule so it's both clear to players and more easily moderatable but i'm really happy that everyone involved agrees that drama is the more fun way to handle things

Getting people upset is way better then letting it be organized and understandable

this but unironically

deletedalmost 9 years

BillStickers says

it would be really easy to just rewrite the rule so it's both clear to players and more easily moderatable but i'm really happy that everyone involved agrees that drama is the more fun way to handle things

Getting people upset is way better then letting it be organized and understandable

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

BillStickers says

it would be really easy to just rewrite the rule so it's both clear to players and more easily moderatable but i'm really happy that everyone involved agrees that drama is the more fun way to handle things

They wont rewrite the rule because then they'd have to admit it's problem.

Just rename the rule to "active censorship"

UniversalStudios

almost 9 years

krystalk says

@kerry yes but Calvin set the example that it was okay but if ou don't see that then im not gonna argue

Not sure why people are struggling to understand this, you can't let people say this over the course of 3 days then ban someone for it out of spite because you believed them to be acting out of spite.

The current modding is terrible