true unless something changed in the last 5 months. but "harsher" is up for interpretation since in the real-time lucid discussion (which lucid requested) circa september 2015 (which i was a part of) there weren't any real specifics on where to draw the line on specific words
i still don't like the "tumblrisms" or whatever is happening if the rule is currently being over-moderated or whatever
deletedalmost 9 years
btw lucid made the rules for hc, not the mods, for those of you who still don't know that
Ehhh, mods wrote the HC rule itself, Lucid only required them to get harsher on it, he didn't tell them to apply it in an unbalanced way or to go full tumblr on it though.
he also didn't ask them to use to find reasons to ban people
deletedalmost 9 years
Good reason!!
deletedalmost 9 years
btw lucid made the rules for hc, not the mods, for those of you who still don't know that
Ehhh, mods wrote the HC rule itself, Lucid only required them to get harsher on it, he didn't tell them to apply it in an unbalanced way or to go full tumblr on it though.
honestly mods don't need to reply to every complaint made (and they don't; this isn't a criticism). i think many users take advantage of the fact that most mods are kind enough to even give their petty garbage the light of day. if it were me, i definitely wouldn't be engaging vilden over this lol
So now that I've been serious and done my duty as a moderator to justify Devante with an actual response, anyone wanna play Stack It or Battlesnakes instead of being upset that you can't call people bad names on a lighthearted party game site?
if you ever feel yourself aligning with Zovea you should probably reassess your stance
Even a broken clock is right twice a day friend.
Except he's digital and reads 13 on the hours
He could just be using military time
deletedalmost 9 years
if you ever feel yourself aligning with Zovea you should probably reassess your stance
Even a broken clock is right twice a day friend.
Except he's digital and reads 13 on the hours
deletedalmost 9 years
Also, agreement that what vilden said was HC was virtually unanimous, this was not just me vioing vilden for the hell of it and going rogue.
so who is gonna reword the hc vio so it's known that if the person thinks you're implying something offensive it will also result in a vio
Mangofruit and I have a pretty good vision for the HC vio.
deletedalmost 9 years
It's been over 5 minutes since Zovea has last replied. I am therefore the winner of this internet battle and the superior human being.
deletedalmost 9 years
if you ever feel yourself aligning with Zovea you should probably reassess your stance
Even a broken clock is right twice a day friend.
deletedalmost 9 years
when I say shut up homo to people you could twist it and say i'm saying "shut up f*ggot".
Depending on the context, I would also vio this.
The word rtard is what is a vio, not synonms of it. if someone said shut up black guy you can't turn around and say they're saying shut up n*gger
If said in the correct (incorrect, rather) context, I again think this qualifies for HC.
"rtard is a bad word to describe people who are mentally disabled, so calling someone mentally disabled is in turn calling them rtard, but calling them an idiot (implying they're mentally slow) is not a vio"
The difference between calling someone an idiot and calling them mentally challenged is apparent.