So I was reading around on the internet and apparently people are actually fighting for "Pedosexuals"... it's as it sounds, pedophiles. It baffles me that people are actually such SJW that they could argue for such a thing.... if you don't believe me search for the "fckh8" posters and articles. man.....
deletedover 9 years
I was speaking solely of pedophila and I guess I meant to quote about you seemingly disagreeing with the sex offender registry
Sirius, I'm not arguing that there isn't a psychological backbone to all these urges, just that even those are incommutable. I'll have to stick to the bulk of modern day research for my opinion.
deletedover 9 years
retti is the biggest pedophile this site has ever seen
How can he disagree with your reasoning for why it was moot before you say it's moot? By the time you posted that it was mood, you'd already restarted the debate from a stopped point.
Weird meta debates are fun (for me) though.
I disagree that it was stopped but man I'm too tired to go and try to prove that, lmao.
if U disagree that it was stopped U must have been anticipating another post from sirius, since his was the last on that topic. if that is true, i find that kind of strange b/c it didn't seem to me like there was going to be an impending double post from sirius.
deletedover 9 years
i'd love to stay and chat guys, but i have to go Be A Pedophile
deletedover 9 years
i chose to address that instead of the part where you were okay with some drunk guy who peed on a wall never being able to find a job again and having to report his sex offender status to all of his neighbors for the rest of time
People should have a right to know if they're being closely associated with a known previous convicted pedophile
rutab are you seriously arguing that taking a pee is pedophilia
i chose to address that instead of the part where you were okay with some drunk guy who peed on a wall never being able to find a job again and having to report his sex offender status to all of his neighbors for the rest of time
People should have a right to know if they're being closely associated with a known previous convicted pedophile
peeing on a wall =/= sex with children .... at least i think that's how it works
How can he disagree with your reasoning for why it was moot before you say it's moot? By the time you posted that it was mood, you'd already restarted the debate from a stopped point.
Weird meta debates are fun (for me) though.
I disagree that it was stopped but man I'm too tired to go and try to prove that, lmao.
deletedover 9 years
psychology is the oldest science bros. neuroscientists are largely just charlatans selling people absolution of their sins by newfangled bullsh*t
deletedover 9 years
i chose to address that instead of the part where you were okay with some drunk guy who peed on a wall never being able to find a job again and having to report his sex offender status to all of his neighbors for the rest of time
People should have a right to know if they're being closely associated with a known previous convicted pedophile
deletedover 9 years
goodbar is a tiny man and homosexual lol
deletedover 9 years
again - nietzsche's 'will to power'.
deletedover 9 years
we also have alan turing in that new 'enigma' movie, whose homosexuality was almost exactly equal to nabokov's humbert humbert's paedophilia in their conceptions/finer points (each trying to recreate one young love).
Are you arguing that all sexual urges are based in an active choice? Because that's really what it sounds like and I'd have to categorically disagree.
it's not just me, mate. it's pretty much everyone with a brain throughout history. even george r.r. martin's homosexual characters are a play on conditioned homosexuality (robert baratheon's younger brother, looking up to him, robert baratheon the most powerful man in all the kingdoms yadda yadda, all his brother needs ... but robert baratheon pays no attention to him and so his ratty little brother looks for another man lmao).
How can he disagree with your reasoning for why it was moot before you say it's moot? By the time you posted that it was moot, you'd already restarted the debate from a stopped point.
Well it was already stopped before you posted about it again ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
... was it?
Yes, you just hadn't had the last word (:
Sirius presented a new argument that I wanted to reply to? Please don't reduce this to a "no he started it" type thing =/
But if U wanted to reply to his argument, then U didn't think it was moot to continue the discussion. Cannot have it both ways, sir.
He indirectly disagreed with my reasoning for why it was moot though, by saying mine has no basis. That's why it was justified for me to post the link.
we also have alan turing in that new 'enigma' movie, whose homosexuality was almost exactly equal to nabokov's humbert humbert's paedophilia in their conceptions/finer points (each trying to recreate one young love).
Are you arguing that all sexual urges are based in an active choice? Because that's really what it sounds like and I'd have to categorically disagree.
deletedover 9 years
fun fact: in a handful of states you're stripped of your voting rights and forced to register with the sex offender registry for public urination
I don't see anything wrong with the sex offender registry but the voting thing is wrong and I didn't know about that
being a registered sex offender is one of the worst things you can be. good luck getting a job. or hell, good luck getting a home.
Well it was already stopped before you posted about it again ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
nice donger arcbell. as you're probably aware, the truth of internet drama is everyone has to pretend to not like it and to want it to stop but secretly we all love arguing
yesssss
deletedover 9 years
am i allowed to ask sirius if i can buy drugs from him or will i get a violation
If it's illegal, then you'd be violating the terms of use. U can't use the site to facilitate illegal thingies, or it's bad. Or something.
can i just admire his choice in substances that make him say crazy things then
Well it was already stopped before you posted about it again ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
... was it?
Yes, you just hadn't had the last word (:
Sirius presented a new argument that I wanted to reply to? Please don't reduce this to a "no he started it" type thing =/
deletedover 9 years
i chose to address that instead of the part where you were okay with some drunk guy who peed on a wall never being able to find a job again and having to report his sex offender status to all of his neighbors for the rest of time