deletedalmost 10 years

I would like to have a thought provoking and civil conversation about ISIS.....what you think will stop them, what will make it worse. Please make this a civil and appropriate discussion. i am looking for a good conversation not a flame war.

almost 10 years
Religion doesn't provide morality. At least, religion isn't required -for- a sense of morality. Regardless of your opinion on religion though, I would argue that it actually is highly useful for at the very least a sense of comfort. You can call it weak or unintelligent, but that doesn't change that it actually -is- important. Being in a universe where nothing exists is a very, very terrifying prospect for people.
deletedalmost 10 years
As a mildly religious person, I can safely say the only "need" for religion is created by the religions themselves. That doesn't make religion bad, but it's a choice. Not a requirement.
almost 10 years
I really hate this excuse. You're about to say that religion provides (1) community and (2) morality. Both are attainable by other (better) means.
almost 10 years

Peta says


projectmatt says

you're also eradicating those who need religion


Really? Like who?


presuming this is a genuine question and not a passive aggressive comment, i'll be happy to answer it
almost 10 years

projectmatt says

you're also eradicating those who need religion


Really? Like who?
almost 10 years

Rondar says

I don't want to eradicate anything, just work against any (physically) violent force, again, no matter the cause (because like you said, it may have been there anyway).


Then I'm totally behind you on that. I would just argue that the cause of violence is within people themselves, and religion acts as a faulty rationale for the violent acts to occur.
almost 10 years
I don't want to eradicate anything, just work against any (physically) violent force, again, no matter the cause (because like you said, it may have been there anyway).
almost 10 years
I feel like you misunderstood me because I agree with what you said completely.
deletedalmost 10 years
it's not even that it's hypocritical, it's sensible in its own ways, it's just ridiculously unfeasible and would probably shake the society that perpetrated it to its core even if it were feasible. but then it's also a political undertaking that just seems too big for the individual proponent of it and thusly something which also very much flirts with being religion/is more in metaphysical consideration than practical
almost 10 years

Rondar says

OK I WANTED TO POST THIS AT LIKE PAGE 24 BUT A GAME STARTED:

A world without religion would honestly be a better one for me, but I understand that not everyone thinks like that and not everyone can live without religion. Some of the smartest people I know are extremely religious. I wouldn't eradicate any religion. I'd simply work against any violent force, not matter the motivation. That's my super liberal side.


Tbh the problem with this is that along with eradicating violent behavior, you're also eradicating those who need religion or those who become healthy or stable or find a sense of purpose due to it. I would also that violence against other humans would be happening regardless of whether or not religion was a factor, but religion has tragically been used as a scapegoat for ages to justify horrific and ignorant things
almost 10 years
I do think eradication is extremely hypocritical. I'd support (and I HATE the English word for this, it sounds so freaking douchey:) "enlightenment" as in the 18th century.

And no I do not mean to imply I am "enlightened", I just think a repeat of the trend to drift away from religion would be benificial.
deletedalmost 10 years
meh, i guess they're not that childish, but they're dressed up in definitely.
deletedalmost 10 years
it's all religion. notions of eradicating religion are extremely childish/probably just rather thoughtless psychological propping up of some materialistic metaphysical conceptions. it's a question of self-preservation or trying to foster greater unity, really, while the rest is just dressing - atheism vs. christianity isn't much different from aryanism vs. anything else, not psychologically. it's a question of how easily you can kill another person.
almost 10 years
Sure. Don't bully me though ;-;
deletedalmost 10 years
get on skype, punk
almost 10 years
Yeah =P

It's not that I have anything against religious people, I promise I don't. You know I don't. I defend people's right to a religion all the time (have been doing it all thread). And yes, religion can sometimes bring out the best in people, but I really think a lack of religion would very likely mean an ideally more civil world. It doesn't mean I have the right or ability to do anything against it. People can and should believe what they want to believe, I just think they happen to be wrong. Those are just hypotheticals though, feel free to ignore them.
deletedalmost 10 years
meh
almost 10 years
OK I WANTED TO POST THIS AT LIKE PAGE 24 BUT A GAME STARTED:

A world without religion would honestly be a better one for me, but I understand that not everyone thinks like that and not everyone can live without religion. Some of the smartest people I know are extremely religious. I wouldn't eradicate any religion. I'd simply work against any violent force, not matter the motivation. That's my super liberal side.
deletedalmost 10 years
syrian girl is hot as btw lol. do u know her irl jackhammer?
deletedalmost 10 years
sorry man
deletedalmost 10 years
Man, ya never know. Perhaps I am just blinded with the grief of the state my hometown is in thanks to the collective efforts of ISIS and the Assad family.
deletedalmost 10 years
meh
almost 10 years
Did you know ISIS vaccinates their children? Don't let Jenny McCarthy find out
deletedalmost 10 years
maybe it's all they have i guess. maybe it rings sensible deep down inside them, religion aside.
deletedalmost 10 years
sorry reword that post i got kinda lost after reading it 3 times