about 10 years

I'M BACK FOR YOUR ANNUAL RELIGIOUS DISCUSSION

so do[es] he/she/it/they exist?

about 10 years
Which market?
deletedabout 10 years

Steven says

I wish lolwot =)


I'm sorry you can't wish for me, I'm off the market :^)
about 10 years
I wish lolwot =)
deletedabout 10 years

Steven says

Goodnight Edark, I hope you understand Christians a little more now =)


Pretty sure he was trolling you this entire time :^)
about 10 years
Goodnight Edark, I hope you understand Christians a little more now =)
about 10 years
Im actually done with this thread now since Im heading to bed, but this have been a very funny thread, goodnight folks
deletedabout 10 years
That's why I said these threads are only interesting when people from different religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam to a degree, anything else non-Abrahamic) that you don't usually hear from post in them.
about 10 years

Edark says


Steven says


Edark says

Also backinturq, if it was just a temporary solution then the bible should be updated without it, dont you agree?


Not really, there's a lot of things that wouldnt make sense without it


I would love to hear some examples, since back and eagles seems to think different than you


I do think differently than them a little bit, but not at all in the way you're thinking. They will agree with me that Jesus sacrifice can only be understood via the old Testament, just ask them.
deletedabout 10 years

Edark says

This is just your own interpretation of the whole ordeal with 0 basis right?


The basis I have is in the Gospels when Jesus talks about the old way of doing things. "I have not come to abolish the (Old Testament) but to fulfill them" If a contract is fulfilled, then what it was meant to accomplish has already been completed. Hence Jesus' cry on the cross saying "It is finished." But many things that were spoken in the Old Testament are still truth. So, when the Old Testament says "Respect your parents" and the New Testament is like "Hey, that still is true." Then you follow what it says.

What Steven is talking about is that there are a number of things in the Old Testament that were for a specific people in a specific time. In Leviticus, there's a section about what happens when you get mold in your house. It's advice we would sitll follow, if we didn't have contractors who could help us restore our house and take care of the mold.

God knew about mold being a problem in houses, so healthwise, He gave advice on how to deal with it. That's obviously not a doctrine that someone starts a church around "The Church of Removing Mold"
about 10 years
I believe a debate about objective/subjective/no-morality would be a lot more fun though, since it's something there's quite some common ground to work for. This is just people explaining their beliefs and others looking for contradictions, not really anywhere anyone will learn much or be swayed IMO
about 10 years

Steven says


Edark says

Also backinturq, if it was just a temporary solution then the bible should be updated without it, dont you agree?


Not really, there's a lot of things that wouldnt make sense without it


I would love to hear some examples, since back and eagles seems to think different than you
about 10 years

Edark says

Also backinturq, if it was just a temporary solution then the bible should be updated without it, dont you agree?


Not really, there's a lot of things that wouldnt make sense without it
deletedabout 10 years
[Citation Needed]
about 10 years
Also backinturq, if it was just a temporary solution then the bible should be updated without it, dont you agree?
about 10 years

Edark says


backinturqoise says


Edark says


backinturqoise says

If you're meaning to change things in the Bible like "Hey, it's ok to murder now, sorry we didn't allow that for a while." I think you can see how that would be problematic?
The Bible talks about God never changing, why should His Word change?


He sure seems never changing , but you said earlier that he changed his mind about this contract(Old testament), so why wouldnt he change his mind now?


That's because the Old Covenant was a temporary solution. I'm not God so I can't tell you why He didn't just send Jesus right away and get the whole thing taken care of, but 2 Peter 3:9 says that "God is not slow in keeping His promise, as some understand slowness" (We have a very VERY different interpretation of time than God does) "Instead, He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance"

God's plan is perfect, but is so much smarter than what we can comprehend, so it's ok to not have all of the answers sometimes


"That's because the Old Covenant was a temporary solution." This is just your own interpretation of the whole ordeal with 0 basis right?


Not her opinion. Again, a viewpoint held by Biblical scholars.
about 10 years

backinturqoise says


Edark says


backinturqoise says

If you're meaning to change things in the Bible like "Hey, it's ok to murder now, sorry we didn't allow that for a while." I think you can see how that would be problematic?
The Bible talks about God never changing, why should His Word change?


He sure seems never changing , but you said earlier that he changed his mind about this contract(Old testament), so why wouldnt he change his mind now?


That's because the Old Covenant was a temporary solution. I'm not God so I can't tell you why He didn't just send Jesus right away and get the whole thing taken care of, but 2 Peter 3:9 says that "God is not slow in keeping His promise, as some understand slowness" (We have a very VERY different interpretation of time than God does) "Instead, He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance"

God's plan is perfect, but is so much smarter than what we can comprehend, so it's ok to not have all of the answers sometimes


"That's because the Old Covenant was a temporary solution." This is just your own interpretation of the whole ordeal with 0 basis right?
about 10 years

Edark says


Steven says


Edark says


Steven says


Edark says

This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O


Only if you think the context was telling you "it's wrong to do this" as opposed to "you shouldn't do this". Some parts are up to debate while others are more agreed upon being one or the other. The thing is that the old testament was not only what God said was right or wrong but also set different traditions, procedures, etc that should be followed for the nation to prosper. Basically, lots of advice mixed in with rules. Some other things are also not relevant at all anymore due to the sacrifice with Jesus.


Did he sacrifice Jesus to forgive of all the current sinners or to get rid of his old rules/advices which made people sinnes?


Forgive. Sin still exists. There are some things in the bible which aren't sin, though. For example, God tells us that it is wise to invest money, but that doesn't mean that if you don't invest you're sinning


So the rules/advice are still supposed to be followed since that is gods words? Sounds quite different to what backinturq told me O_O


The moral rules should be, yes. As long as you have faith you are forgiven, however. Advice is a lot more subjective. BTW I call it advice but that's a terrible word, I just don't know what to call it. I just mean stuff that would have been terrible for example health-wise back then but aren't anymore.
about 10 years

Steven says


Edark says


Steven says


Edark says

This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O


Only if you think the context was telling you "it's wrong to do this" as opposed to "you shouldn't do this". Some parts are up to debate while others are more agreed upon being one or the other. The thing is that the old testament was not only what God said was right or wrong but also set different traditions, procedures, etc that should be followed for the nation to prosper. Basically, lots of advice mixed in with rules. Some other things are also not relevant at all anymore due to the sacrifice with Jesus.


Did he sacrifice Jesus to forgive of all the current sinners or to get rid of his old rules/advices which made people sinnes?


Forgive. Sin still exists. There are some things in the bible which aren't sin, though. For example, God tells us that it is wise to invest money, but that doesn't mean that if you don't invest you're sinning


So the rules/advice are still supposed to be followed since that is gods words? Sounds quite different to what backinturq told me O_O
about 10 years

Edark says


Steven says


Edark says

This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O


Only if you think the context was telling you "it's wrong to do this" as opposed to "you shouldn't do this". Some parts are up to debate while others are more agreed upon being one or the other. The thing is that the old testament was not only what God said was right or wrong but also set different traditions, procedures, etc that should be followed for the nation to prosper. Basically, lots of advice mixed in with rules. Some other things are also not relevant at all anymore due to the sacrifice with Jesus.


Did he sacrifice Jesus to forgive of all the current sinners or to get rid of his old rules/advices which made people sinnes?


Forgive. Sin still exists. There are some things in the bible which aren't sin, though. For example, God tells us that it is wise to invest money, but that doesn't mean that if you don't invest you're sinning. Right now its still pretty wise to invest money, but if we lived in a communist state or something the advice wouldn't really apply.
deletedabout 10 years

Edark says


backinturqoise says

If you're meaning to change things in the Bible like "Hey, it's ok to murder now, sorry we didn't allow that for a while." I think you can see how that would be problematic?
The Bible talks about God never changing, why should His Word change?


He sure seems never changing , but you said earlier that he changed his mind about this contract(Old testament), so why wouldnt he change his mind now?


That's because the Old Covenant was a temporary solution. I'm not God so I can't tell you why He didn't just send Jesus right away and get the whole thing taken care of, but 2 Peter 3:9 says that "God is not slow in keeping His promise, as some understand slowness" (We have a very VERY different interpretation of time than God does) "Instead, He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance"

God's plan is perfect, but is so much smarter than what we can comprehend, so it's ok to not have all of the answers sometimes
about 10 years

Steven says


Edark says

This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O


Only if you think the context was telling you "it's wrong to do this" as opposed to "you shouldn't do this". Some parts are up to debate while others are more agreed upon being one or the other. The thing is that the old testament was not only what God said was right or wrong but also set different traditions, procedures, etc that should be followed for the nation to prosper. Basically, lots of advice mixed in with rules. Some other things are also not relevant at all anymore due to the sacrifice with Jesus.


Did he sacrifice Jesus to forgive of all the current sinners or to get rid of his old rules/advices which made people sinnes?
about 10 years

Edark says

This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O


Only if you think the context was telling you "it's wrong to do this" as opposed to "you shouldn't do this". Some parts are up to debate while others are more agreed upon being one or the other. The thing is that the old testament was not only what God said was right or wrong but also set different traditions, procedures, etc that should be followed for the nation to prosper. Basically, lots of advice mixed in with rules. Some other things are also not relevant at all anymore due to the sacrifice with Jesus.
about 10 years

LadyNemesis says


Edark says


LadyNemesis says

You don't 'update' the old works of Caesar either, do you? Maybe you translate it better, but you don't just update the works to represent the current worldview.


Thats still not even close to the same situation. A more accurate comparision would be an outdated rulebook being updated to todays values, which seems like a pretty OK idea for me.


I don't see it as a "rule book", I see it as a work of cultural and historical importance. I think it would be a waste to just change it.


Well your view doesnt reflect upon everyone and there certainly do exist tons of people who try and follow these to their best judgement , but obviously not every rule since its impossible in todays world, which it should be updated so its more fitting?
about 10 years
This also implies that the rules he set in Lex is still supposed to be followed, which many here seems to think otherwise about backinturq, why is that? O_O
deletedabout 10 years
The various translations of the Bible just make the original word less and less accurate. Hence reformations being things which weaken the moral authority of a religion.