This image has been approved by the previous admin (bronto) and it was no vio'd and approved in at least 5 reports in the last 3 months. It was removed with no reason given by "oliver". I told him that it was already approved, and I reploaded it. He then banned me for 24 hours and removed it again. He said the precedent has changed because this time they reverse image searched it and naked pictures came up. SO?! I'm not using those pictures. I've been using THAT one. The censored one that shows nothing.
If Google was going to take down Epic Mafia over a censored picture they would have done it in the 3 months that it's been my avatar. This is clearly an attack on me and my sexual orientation. Nobody would know these men were nude below the waist unless they reverse image searched it. And why would they do that, unless they WANTED to see them naked? You literally had to SEARCH for a way to give me a violation. oliver and gennehfarrxD should be reprimanded and my ban should be lifted, as well as my violation. This is a clear abuse of power and it's a personal attack against me and my sexual orientation.
Abuse Of Power
33 signed
We believe this violation is an abuse of power and that the avatar is NOT inappropriate and does NOT violate the rules of EpicMafia.
don't see what constructive content is coming out of this other than people on rutab for saying he doesn't agree with abortion
deletedalmost 10 years
No, I will. We're handling it and talking to MikeyRu in PM right now about the issue. There's no need for this topic to go on any longer as complaints are supposed to be used for criticisms/feedback for the moderators, not about abortion or whatever you're posting about. Take it to another thread.
deletedalmost 10 years
your fault for acting like youre a god of gods to him
deletedalmost 10 years
Hello guys. I'm going to privately discuss this with MikeyRu for a clear solution that'll aim to please aeveryone - in the meantime, can we keep this on subject and avoid straying into targetting other users and/or harassing them? Cheers.
That's not for me to determine. I am personally against abortion and that's not changing. I think especially if the fetus has a heart beat, it should not be legal to terminate.
It has nothing tp do with womens' rights nor the woman herself.
ehhhh you're gonna get hate for this but know that I respect others' opinions
deletedalmost 10 years
That's not for me to determine. I am personally against abortion and that's not changing. I think especially if the fetus has a heart beat, it should not be legal to terminate.
It has nothing tp do with womens' rights nor the woman herself.
actually it does. thanks for confirming bill was right. cya
deletedalmost 10 years
That's not for me to determine. I am personally against abortion and that's not changing. I think especially if the fetus has a heart beat, it should not be legal to terminate.
It has nothing tp do with womens' rights nor the woman herself.
And by the way, I sent oliver a private message when I reploaded my avatar (before he gave me the vio) and told him it had been approved. Knowing that, he gave me the vio and ban.
Screenshot the PM and post it otherwise it's just empty words
do u think he's lying lol
No but we can't do anything without proof
deletedalmost 10 years
And by the way, I sent oliver a private message when I reploaded my avatar (before he gave me the vio) and told him it had been approved. Knowing that, he gave me the vio and ban.
Screenshot the PM and post it otherwise it's just empty words
And by the way, I sent oliver a private message when I reploaded my avatar (before he gave me the vio) and told him it had been approved. Knowing that, he gave me the vio and ban.
Screenshot the PM and post it otherwise it's just empty words
deletedalmost 10 years
i didn't say anything about rutab's opinion, that was other people
deletedalmost 10 years
I know that he thinks Mikey should be allowed to post whatever avi he likes for his own personal beliefs or reasons.
But on the other hand Rutab cannot have an opinion on a certain subject based on his own personal beliefs or reasons.