Scenarios have occured that, together, clearly demonstrate that the moderator team is severely racist.
Scenario one:
I use the n-word in the context "[name] called me a n-----". I receive a hateful comments violation for using the n-word in my sentence. This was despite my use of the word clearly not being in a hateful context.
The second comment in the screenshot refers to this report https://epicmafia.com/report/254962 which charley gave a no-vio to, of course with no explanation (moderators protect their own)
After being reported for the second comment, bsm still received no-vio, even though it's obvious that if a non-moderator was repeatedly racist after being reported for it then they would probably get banned https://epicmafia.com/report/254965
Additional:
Throughout this thread, BSM has defended his multiple racist posts by saying that he is white. He states it is not possible to be racist against white people if you are white. Supposedly, this is what makes his actions appropriate.
Spiritualized, a black, posted "the whites can't handle being called crackers (sorry crackers)". They unequivocally used racist language in a hateful manner. They received a no-vio verdict. This was despite the only purported reason that BSM was not reprimanded not applying here.
The moderators give people vios for even mentioning the n-word. However, they encourage the use of racial slurs against white people. The moderators are perpetuating black privilege and are attempting to engage in a sitewide white genocide.
I am not F-typing in the slightest. I don't use the word, so it is no worry to me if the word is banned or not. And the word is banned on the site and he said it, that's all it is.
This thread is the ultimate "F type devoid of reasoning beyond their feelings" thread.
There's is literally 0 difference between the arguments in the original thread and this one except the vain attempt to equate "cracker" to a slur in the OP.
He's not complaining that people get vios for it. He's complaining that it's the only thing people get vios for, and he's got a good point because the current rules don't allow for hate speech to be given violations unless it's under the harassment rule (which requires repeated instances) and which will always be overturned by another moderator (because the appeals/sustain system is absolutely horrendous).
I mean, I guess if Jeff reports the people for saying it, why does he complain that people get vios for it? Like lmfao what the fk is the point of reporting in the first place?
i guess congrats, you're both idiots? the rules didn't allow me to do more
deleteddeletedalmost 8 years ago
haha
deleteddeletedalmost 8 years agoedited
You think if I had written "e" instead of a star there then it would have been hate speech? LMAO! Are you black or just straight-up virtue signalling? Black people are typically way more liberal (and objective, and rational) on matters like this; it's the white people that feel guilty for historical slavery that freak out at anything about race.
Diane Abbott isn't speaking on a site that has had a zero tolerance policy for racist language in its rules for 10 years, regardless of how it's been enforced
I mean you've been at this for the better part of 2 months, do we really need to rehash every single argument you've made because you're too childish to admit that your lack of discretion in the report is violation worthy?
Also I hadn't read the OP, but there's nothing I can do to terrorize white people on the same level of being called the n word, the homophobic f word, or posts of pictures of black face and monkeys in response to my topics.
deleteddeletedalmost 8 years ago
yes
deleteddeletedalmost 8 years ago
Was watching Question Time and Diane Abbott said "... calling people p*kis and nigg*rs..." without censoring herself. So she's racist too right? It's the same neutral context that I used it in.
