Scenarios have occured that, together, clearly demonstrate that the moderator team is severely racist.
Scenario one:
I use the n-word in the context "[name] called me a n-----". I receive a hateful comments violation for using the n-word in my sentence. This was despite my use of the word clearly not being in a hateful context.
The second comment in the screenshot refers to this report https://epicmafia.com/report/254962 which charley gave a no-vio to, of course with no explanation (moderators protect their own)
After being reported for the second comment, bsm still received no-vio, even though it's obvious that if a non-moderator was repeatedly racist after being reported for it then they would probably get banned https://epicmafia.com/report/254965
Additional:
Throughout this thread, BSM has defended his multiple racist posts by saying that he is white. He states it is not possible to be racist against white people if you are white. Supposedly, this is what makes his actions appropriate.
Spiritualized, a black, posted "the whites can't handle being called crackers (sorry crackers)". They unequivocally used racist language in a hateful manner. They received a no-vio verdict. This was despite the only purported reason that BSM was not reprimanded not applying here.
The moderators give people vios for even mentioning the n-word. However, they encourage the use of racial slurs against white people. The moderators are perpetuating black privilege and are attempting to engage in a sitewide white genocide.
Like there are genuine signs of actual psychosis in the things you type. You legitimately are losing your grip on reality and it’s kinda scary to watch you unravel.
He used it for shock value. Otherwise he would have just typed "N*****" or "the N-word", but that wouldn't suit his purposes
Remember when you called antifa terrorists like two months ago and now the people they were protesting started killing black and Jewish Americans in places of worship? yikes.
It's OK as long as the victims aren't gay right jeff? They're the only ones you're actually capable of empathy for
A self admitted white supremacist gunned down ten people because he thought they were a threat to white America.
Gulag is upset because he got called a cracker after he got a violation for using the N word.
Why the fᴜck are you pandering to a racist instead of acknowledging that people who feel that being white makes them a victim are just scumbags, and that the Pittsburgh shooting is the outcome?
First of all, I'm white, so me using the word cracker isn't racist at all.
Secondly, cracker is just a word for white trash in the south, and since it's been in use for 300 years it's pretty obviously not a word that was being used by the non-white population since they ran the risk of being lynched. So it's a white origin word, which means at best you can argue that it's classist.
And finally, are you really saying you see no link between the mindsets of a racist troll on a website claiming to be oppressed for being white, and a man who committed a heinous crime because the victims were different to him, and gave aid to brown refugees?
It's all the same shīt Carmen, someone thinking that their whiteness is being threatened and they react. Gulag does it by complaining about being called a cracker, and this guy did it with a gun.
God that is such reactionary bullshit. The fucked up news story of the day has NO bearing on the hypocrisy of HC verdicts on this flash mafia site, and it's actually really messed up for you to use that event to win an argument. Cracker is definitely a racist term; whether it's on par with n*gger is up for debate, but you can't say "no racist words in any context" then use a racist word in jest.
I'm still laughing at the fact you think it's acceptable to bring up a massacre to defend your racist language here. Like I said, I can see why you're an ex-mod.
