I was kind of hoping this report would have been delayed a bit so we could have a few more games to review before posting it, but well too late for that. From just spectating the games and reading the OP I'm fairly sure there is some clear bias in the play and possible cheating. But reading (Well skillimg through) Meg's analysis I'd say that it might not be cheating and as long as they stop playing ranked together this round shouldn't be a problem.

See what happens when you talk after sippin the henny?

But really......Will Lucid will do anything at all? He need to be a judge of this and reply to this conversation or else,all this hard work will go to waste

I want to see Kennedy explain how he hasn't FOS'd wrong in 25 games.

No, I wrote that over the course of the last two hours, dude. That's where I've been since this thread was created, and it is literally Germ's stuff copied and pasted and then my replies to each and every single part.

I read the part you wrote just now, you wrote the Google Doc thing hours ago. I'd assume that there'd be something worthwhile in the thing you took forever to write.

So, Duck, you're saying.. "I read everything but the part where you respond to the points presented against you. BTW you didn't respond to the points presented against you."

I have read it all. Both the arguments and the counterarguments can make sense when applied to the game. I'd have to really look through and read every game to determine who's good with rhetoric and who's telling the truth...

It's /not/ all circumstantial, though.

I didn't read the Google Doc though. Don't feel like it right now.

I read it Megs. But you really didn't address any of the actual points.

OH I FOUND IT my bad.

For those too lazy to read five paragraphs:

https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1cjGlWylCqyCWsz-Ugk9Ub3N_nOqex_rhRZsYPe0ttXw&hl=en&authkey=CO7zqO8K

There is the full play-by-play you're looking for.

beka, check the link loveee.

the link is the rebuttle to the game comments lol u people are hilarious.

You cannot possibly have actually read it, DuckHunter, it's quite long and you answered in about 2 minutes.

TL;DR: I play with Kennedy because he is my friend and also I don't cheat.

If you're going to type a rebuttal atleast address each game. You basically made a huge wall of text that says nothing but 'kennedy is my friend and this isn't what it looks like'

That rebuttal literally answered nothing

The only time he fos's wrong is when he's mafia.
Same thing goes for Megs given that Kennedy isn't mafia.

Cavsfan just wants to add to his "cheaters caught" list. And is in 2nd place...


Duck and LOLUMAD - I still don't see intent to cheat. Megs doesn't FOS her friends much, which is a very unfair advantage, so she shouldn't play with them anymore. You have to prove the intent to cheat to ban. If it's the integrity of the game you're worried about, then stopping them from playing together anymore achieves your goal.

It is a little silly that Kennedy hasn't FOS'd wrong once in 25 games... is that really true? Can someone show me an example of him FOSing wrong?

I dunno how you could vote unfazed over me in that first game posted...

Agreed with Effulgence - the fact that Megs and Kennedy are winning trophies is evidence enough that they're cheating.

LOLOLOL

Certified and approved by Cavsfan.

When you look at Lamer and LOLUMAD play, it's clear they aren't cheating because of the nature of Lamer's play. She knows that LOLUMAD is a pretty good player so she deals with him cautiously (when fos'ing, etc). That's the natural way to react to a player who is good enough to win a trophy.

When you look at Megs, there is never any focus on Kennedy's alignment. If Kennedy were as good as his record this round shows, she'd naturally be a lot more careful in dealing with him.

Yeah i meant the op. sorry :(