Except they can't blatantly flip an accept vote onto a good team and have it go through. Because if this team goes through all good the game is practically over. We put the same 4 people back again the next two and there's nothing they can do.
Can they reject a bad team for no reason? Sure! But it puts them at risk of us stumbling across a good team next time
dude claire read the game. everyone's reads are picked out of a hat and people's reasons are literally out of fear of being beguiled. no one is committing to logic. dumb.
Evil has to do A LOT less right than town in order to win. Trying to find scum motivated actions is gonna be one big fat L in this game. Town can be doing scum sided things without even realizing, only mafia knows the things that aren't maf sided.........
explains your pie lol. dude honestly if you look into things as simple as a vote and never look into the intentions in things people say you're never gonna find scum, ever. a misunderstanding of mechanics is how people lose games, you blatantly and openly are misunderstanding the mechanics of this game and are actually gonna make this a near impossible win because you are reading into flippant votes. there's gonna be dozens of missions and voting can be completely random for scum because they CAN because they're ALREADY IN THE ADVANTAGEOUS ROLE.
Yes because I've played this game 50+ times and putting a team out right away is basically going in blind and saying "have at it" infact we prob should've rejected the first mission just to get discussion flowing why do you think I'm the evil one on it because I asked to be on the team? Are you srs.
Ally you are scummy because you are unable to articulate a reason for your read on me other than it being an obvious fear read or you're mafia wanting me to not win the game against you, meaning you can only discredit me at this point.
I put you on a team because you asked to and because you spoke at the beginning. I just went with you and ally because you spoke first and gave me advice on not starting a team so soon
Tell me why you think I'm bad again. I assure you HighSpace wanted to see me play town this time. Tell me why I'm scum. You've posted how my tone is obv different from last game, so explain your poorly aligned actions in regard to that read.
I think that's a majority but I'd like to note that all 3 people on the first mission (with at least one evil) have now rejected that mission. Could be because there's no evil, could be because there were two.
But I don't think there was one.
deletedabout 7 years
i just realized markus suggested we give alternative teams
my ideal team at the moment would probably be me/scott/markus/lelmoo
deletedabout 7 years
as for the team, i don't particularly feel good about jeff and i'm not sure on ultra, so i'm going to reject
deletedabout 7 years
thank you to the people that townread me
jeff can i know why you scumread me? i don't see a reason but maybe i missed it
out of claire/bryce i see claire as more suspect. bryce didn't put himself on his initial team, and yes he proposed a team quickly but that's also what was recommended in the first thread, emile also recommended joking foses to get conversation going and that's what i did with jeff @ the start lol so i don't think we should fault him for looking off of the first game for inspiration. claire asked to be on a team and then it failed, so i really think that out of the 2 of them it's probably claire, i also read this reaction
as being bad, so that's why my viewpoint was leaning in that direction
deletedabout 7 years
hi sorry i'm at work i'm going to read up real quick fast
And Bryce, following the crowd isn't the best strategy in this game, as 40% of the crowd is evil and trying to push the rest of the crowd to do what they want. So that is likely the people you are following.
We just see the game differently Jeff, you look into tone and you try to scum-read the hell out of everyone - I look into the things they actually do, what they accept, the missions the create and the reasons why they're saying what they're doing.
Ultimately evil has to do things that will help them win the game, I try to pick out what those things are.
The reason scum wins this game so much is evidenced in your points 1-3. You have 0 regard for anything tone or text related. You're trying to force as much mechanics into your game as possible and all you're doing is running around in the tiniest of circles trying to make something out of the one thing that can be the most easily forced: votes.
I don't understand how points 1 2 and 3 of Scott can come from the same rational thinking human. I don't think scum would make those statements all in succession, only bewildered town.
