Back to Forum Games

The Resistance 2

about 7 years

Rules

https://goo.gl/JhSwPT

There are 6 good members, and 4 evil members.


Current Game Status

-

Evil Wins!

-


Missions

  1. Bryce, Sonia, Ally [FAILURE]
  2. Sonia, Jeff, Scott, Ally [FAILURE]
  3. Lelmoo, Jeff, Markus, Bryce [FAILURE]

Past Team Propositions

  • Lelmoo: Lelmoo, Jeff, Markus, Bryce (Accepted)
  • Sonia: Sonia, Jeff, Scott, Ally (Accepted)
  • Flippo: Flippo, Markus, Ultra, Scott (Rejected)
  • Jeff: Scott, Jeff, Markus, Bryce (Rejected)
  • Jbomb: Jbomb, Scott, Jeff, Lelmoo (Rejected)
  • Markus: Markus, Jeff, Lelmoo, Ultra (Rejected)
  • Bryce: Bryce, Sonia, Ally (Accepted)

Sending in Actions

When you want to send a game action (proposing a team or accepting/rejecting a mission), bold your action.

You can bold a comment by doing this: [b]Your Comment[/b]

If you are on the team and the mission is a go, you will send the pass or fail slip by private messaging me.


Adding a rule: You're allowed to switch your accept/reject if no majority has been reached yet.

Finally, you are always free to message me your thoughts on what you think is going on, reads, etc. Doesn't matter if you're a player or a spectator.

deletedabout 7 years
also i heavily townread scott because he's a really bad liar and also very bad at mafia and i don't think he would be this vocal as scum
about 7 years

Otherscott says

This isn't mafia! There's a lot more moves to be made here by the evil team and they have to be done correctly. I've played a lot more resistance than I have mafia and it's normal for the evil to fail the first mission.

If they, the evil, approve a good team here, we WILL put the same team on the next mission. Because why wouldn't we?


...................... I'm gonna go ahead and just let you know that two people far more experienced at this game than you are telling you that you're making glaring mistakes in gameplay and you really should just let yourself evaluate the game differently.
about 7 years

xSoniaNeverMindx says

The fact Jeff is reading and giving a flying fk what anyone here says points to him being town (Plus I think he's town over Lelmoo)


In fairness he did do the same thing last time.
deletedabout 7 years

xSoniaNeverMindx says

To be blunt I don't think Ally is smart enough to fail the first mission


i'm offended
about 7 years

Ally says

can u put ur thoughts in one cohesive post that i can reply to instead of aiming like 4 posts @ me thanks




Purposely problematic. You're able to read. No need for this. My thoughts come in different blocks, not all at once.


Ally says

jeff @ me: ur scum because u think i'm scum!!11!1


This never happened.


Ally says

is there something wrong w/ self improvement jeff


Again, sarcasm rather than playing the game to find scum.
about 7 years
This isn't mafia! There's a lot more moves to be made here by the evil team and they have to be done correctly. I've played a lot more resistance than I have mafia and it's normal for the evil to fail the first mission.

If they, the evil, approve a good team here, we WILL put the same team on the next mission. Because why wouldn't we?
about 7 years
To be blunt I don't think Ally is smart enough to fail the first mission
about 7 years
The fact Jeff is reading and giving a flying fk what anyone here says points to him being town (Plus I think he's town over Lelmoo)
about 7 years
Ally I think your play isn't very town inclined because all you're doing is speaking sarcastically in everything you say and it's not only obnoxious, but it's not very helpful.
deletedabout 7 years
jeff i said i didn't feel good about you more because i'm struggling to get a positive read on you or any kind of read on you at all really
about 7 years

xSoniaNeverMindx says

Good people can do things that look Evil
Evil people try and will do things that look Good because Evil people want to come off as good and not stand out that's how the game is played. Reading interactions and the motivations behind said actions is how you win this game as good


say it louder for the otherscott in the back!
about 7 years

bryce1997 says


xSoniaNeverMindx says


bryce1997 says

I put you on a team because you asked to and because you spoke at the beginning. I just went with you and ally because you spoke first and gave me advice on not starting a team so soon


Yes because I've played this game 50+ times and putting a team out right away is basically going in blind and saying "have at it" infact we prob should've rejected the first mission just to get discussion flowing why do you think I'm the evil one on it because I asked to be on the team? Are you srs.


Oh well it has to be you or ally and you thought it was me for the reasoning of basically my inexperience so I based it off of that


No. What I think happened is this you put in 3 people at random (maybe all town maybe 1 scum but prob not 2) but when I pointed out you have to bold it and I said I wanted to go on the team you saw it as a chance to put me on the team along with Ally who you gave an excuse to put on the team and failed it so you could blame it on and I quote "Me asking to be put on the team"
about 7 years

Otherscott says


Jeff says

You literally CAN vote through good teams as scum, and people do. It's called "That's exactly how the game is played".


And my point is if you do that in this circumstance right here, you will lose the game.

You stick to what you're good at Jeff at let me do what I'm good at.


What are you good at? All I see is a pie full of losses. Your way doesn't work. Don't be complacent in a bad system.
about 7 years

xSoniaNeverMindx says


bryce1997 says

I put you on a team because you asked to and because you spoke at the beginning. I just went with you and ally because you spoke first and gave me advice on not starting a team so soon


Yes because I've played this game 50+ times and putting a team out right away is basically going in blind and saying "have at it" infact we prob should've rejected the first mission just to get discussion flowing why do you think I'm the evil one on it because I asked to be on the team? Are you srs.


Oh well it has to be you or ally and you thought it was me for the reasoning of basically my inexperience so I based it off of that
about 7 years

Jeff says

You literally CAN vote through good teams as scum, and people do. It's called "That's exactly how the game is played".


And my point is if you do that in this circumstance right here, you will lose the game.

You stick to what you're good at Jeff at let me do what I'm good at.
about 7 years
The reason I think Lelmoo could be Evil here is his interaction with Jeff I was specing the last game and his tone was very relaxed and carefree and the moment Jeff put pressure on him here he seemed to crack. I feel like he's nervous that he got scum
about 7 years

Ally says



it's still early in the game and i'm trying to get reads and if me not 100% tring you all the time makes me immediate scum to you that sounds like a personal problem


I mean sure if you'd rather make this a blame game instead of one in which you try to achieve your wincon, sure.
about 7 years
Evil teams aren't always gonna reject good teams because that'd make it obv who the Evil are all the evil people need is 1 person to be seen as good and the game can be over in a snap that's something you need to understand
about 7 years

Ally says


when i said you were playing differently than last time i was saying you were playing differently than you play when you're scum that's not a negative thing


Precisely. You said something in my favor, then SR me anyways.
about 7 years
You act as if people auto send through the teams through a passed mission on the next one. Elfen, Ginga, Vibrage mission passed last game, they then proceeded to not be sent on the next mission. The only reason last game mission 4 went on mission 5 is because Jack misplayed Merlin.
deletedabout 7 years

Jeff says

Ally you are scummy because you are unable to articulate a reason for your read on me other than it being an obvious fear read or you're mafia wanting me to not win the game against you, meaning you can only discredit me at this point.


can u put ur thoughts in one cohesive post that i can reply to instead of aiming like 4 posts @ me thanks

i didn't say that i didn't feel good about you until after you called me scum, so that's not valid and i want a reason why you thought i was the fail on the mission

when i said you were playing differently than last time i was saying you were playing differently than you play when you're scum that's not a negative thing

it's still early in the game and i'm trying to get reads and if me not 100% tring you all the time makes me immediate scum to you that sounds like a personal problem
about 7 years
Good people can do things that look Evil
Evil people try and will do things that look Good because Evil people want to come off as good and not stand out that's how the game is played. Reading interactions and the motivations behind said actions is how you win this game as good
about 7 years

Jeff says

dude claire read the game. everyone's reads are picked out of a hat and people's reasons are literally out of fear of being beguiled. no one is committing to logic. dumb.


I mean you have to remember the only mafia players here are me you and bryce so my normal way of going at this game I feel I can't really do this game because well...Everyone is prob gonna look at things at face value I mean look at the sr's on me there all face value sr's
about 7 years

Otherscott says

Except they can't blatantly flip an accept vote onto a good team and have it go through. Because if this team goes through all good the game is practically over. We put the same 4 people back again the next two and there's nothing they can do.

Can they reject a bad team for no reason? Sure! But it puts them at risk of us stumbling across a good team next time


You literally CAN vote through good teams as scum, and people do. It's called "That's exactly how the game is played".
about 7 years

Ally says

jeff @ me: ur scum because u think i'm scum!!11!1


No I clearly said it's because you are giving reads without giving reasoning behind them. Am I wrong for being concerned with someone who has reads they won't back up?