The Ottoman Empire's collapse was the result of the hedonistic tendencies of the Sultans for generations as they chose to delegate governing to bureaucrats as they indulged in orgies. This was compounded by the decay of loyalty in the legendary Janissary forces employed by the Ottoman Empire in combat.
So Shady is totally wrong about when he said Hitler was Swedish a few pages ago.
deletedabout 7 years
Okay, Shady is right about that. But the problem can be solved in 1,000 years, which is all I said. So probably we didn't need a big long computer science explanation disproving something I never said.
But I'm glad he knows it though. It's a really valuable skill, and it's so cool to see someone illiterate learn something so complicated.
deletedabout 7 years
shady is saying that even if you manage to solve an instance of the queens problems within 1000 years, the clay institute won't give you a million dollars because...
the heart of the P=NP problem is proving whether or not an efficient solution exists
deletedabout 7 years
I mean I guess you have to be pretty smart to know the CS you obviously know and are so proud of, I wonder how you can learn that but not English.
deletedabout 7 years
This is the fourth time I've quoted this for you. Please tell me exactly which part I am wrong about, so I can make you look self-evidently stupid.
Recidivism, just so we're on the same page here: Tatami and I were explaining the same thing - Tatami even said as much. So your point that you were responding to Tatami (and, pointedly, not me) does not mean that your response was any more correct.
deletedabout 7 years
I'm pretty sure I don't have any internet friends but just for the record this is the definition of smart comeback, if you don't think so I'll chalk it up to bad taste
I assume you understood that, and that any further posts from you are a response to it
deletedabout 7 years
The funniest part is that you think I ever read your in-depth analysis of computer science to respond to, you literal moron. I've told you like four times I don't understand computer science, why the f.uck would I read it?
deletedabout 7 years
I certainly wouldn't, you axiomatically misrepresented what I said for one of two reasons
A. You wanted to flaunt your knowledge of Computer Science
B. You do not know how to read, and assumed I was responding to your long paragraph about Computer Science that I never read when I was actually responding to Tatami.
I'm not going to comment on the reading comprehension of people in this discussion.
deletedabout 7 years
Third time is the charm!
deletedabout 7 years
I wasn't responding to you, I was responding to Tatami. I already explained that but I guess we have established that you do know computer science but you do not know how to read
