no.1 and 2 is obviously between maxwell and myself (i'm no.1)
poll includes the top candidates for the next best.
who's the better player
6
Crypto
6
Gira
2
Fantastic
2
Soben
1
Jaguar
deletedabout 7 years
Literally flat out empirically wrong. They probably didn't accept any of your applications to university in 12th grade because you didn't read the instructions.
deletedabout 7 years
You had yet to post my a.ss, you community college clown.
deletedabout 7 years
It's actually so insanely clear what I was responding to that I am not at all surprised that you had to start at a community college.
"I have been asked what do the bigshots in the field think? To make that question rigorous I looked at all of the respondents who have won either a Turing Award, Fields Medal, Nevanlinna Prize, Godel Prize, Kanellakis award, Knuth Prize, or are in the National Academy of Science or Engineering. I also looked into other awards but the ones above subsumed them. Of these 21 people, 17 (81%) think P != NP (though 2 hold that opinion weakly), 2 (9%) think P = NP, and 2 (9%), perhaps the wisest of them all, said they didn’t know. These opinions are very similar to that of all the participants."
i still get the feeling recidivism and tatami are the same person
deletedabout 7 years
shady12: hey man i don't think what you're saying is right and here's why, if i've offended you i apologize, good luck with the girl.
Sonseray: PLEASE tell me more about how you got your PHD in mathematics, no seriously f.ucking tell me why I should listen to a f.ucking highschool dropout that didn't even get a f.cuking ged tell me i'm wrong. go F.UCK yourself subhuman piece of trash, f.ucking waste of space garbage diickhead fagggot tie your neck to the back of a truck and start driving.
...There was no other post you could have possibly been replying to other than his. I had yet to post. No one else was talking about possible/impossible.
Sonse has just gone fully off the deep end. I almost want to say he's faking being an idiot just so he could go "Joke's on them I was only pretending!" but at this point I really don't know.
2012, a poll of computer science and math theorists, those PhDs you're so proud of hiding behind, with 83% of them thinking that such a thing is literally impossible. (And proving such would still win the challenge!)
So clueless, but even more pathetic for not just admitting what you don't know and continuing to try to save face instead of just admitting you're wrong.
You've managed to make yourself look three times as dumb. Congratulations.
The opinion of the entire mathematics community, is, again, that winning the challenge this way (writing the efficient algorithm) would be impossible and that you would instead have to prove that none existed.
Writing an efficient algorithm would win the prize, but the point is that it's very likely that such a thing cannot exist.
deletedabout 7 years
I'll have the last 10,000 words if I want. It's f.ucking hilarious to me that you think completing Computer Science 101 makes you some authority capable of challenging the predominate opinions of the Clayton Math Institute.
Hey, why the f.uck bother with a challenge? They really should have hit up Shady12 and Tatami from epicmafia, they've got the thing figured out after 3 college credit hours.
deletedabout 7 years
Maybe we can collaborate Shady and we can write up your thesis that Computer Science 101 disproves the possibility of completing the challenge and send it to Clayton.
It is unknown whether the million dollar challenge is possible to solve. It is known that the Queens puzzle is possible to solve. You seem to use the word "challenge" interchangeably between the two, leading to some confusion. You can have the last word now.
deletedabout 7 years
Computer Science 101 definitely makes you an authority on the subject. Where can I buy your book?
I have to admit dude I was jealous of your feature article in Plos One for completing Computer Science 101. F.ucking wow, someone who completed 3 college credit hours. Phenomenal.
deletedabout 7 years
But don't worry dude, when Leo Szilard and Oppenheimer were working on Project Manhattan, they looked at it for 3 minutes and then started lecturing in Physics 101 about how it can't be done. That's a good way to be.
deletedabout 7 years
Actually you responded to my axiomatic claim that the challenge is possible to solve, if not probable or practical, with Computer Science 101 which I don't at all care about and which has nothing to do with that assertion, which is self-evidently correct.
