Back to Forum Games

Sandbox Court

about 8 years

Welcome to the Sandbox Court!

I've realized that a lot of people love to debate about many topics on Epicmafia, but don't have a proper place to express these opinions. Hence, I've come up with Sandbox court. Note: This thread is only for suggesting a case or asking to take part in the next case.

‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍

‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ Current Case: Death vs Justice

Pending Cases

Inbox me if you'd like to join one. Include which ones you want to join, and your stance for them.

  • Do you think Net Neutrality should be protected? If not, what is the benefit of getting rid of it? (Protect: 4) (Don't: 3)

  • Do you believe that vaccination should be mandatory or optional? ‍ (Mandatory: 1) (Optional: 2)

  • Should countries take in Syrian Refugees? Would your answer change if you got to pick which religious groups can enter? ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ (Yes: 1) (No: 1) (Only specific groups: 0)

  • Barring external factors (i.e. AdSense), should people be banned for hateful comments? This does not include sustained individual harassment. (Participants: 2)

  • Is human cloning justified, and should it be permitted? (Random Teams)(Participants: 1)

How does it work?

Simply put, every Sunday, there will be a thread dedicated to a new court case. You can suggest a court case either in the comments below or in a pm to me, or any other people I designate as hosts. The case will always end on Saturday.

The topic for a court case can be anything, either on or off EpicMafia, but the more interesting it is then the more likely we will pick it. When a topic is picked, anyone can ask to be included in the court case on either side. For example, if the court case is abortion, then you can ask to be on the pro-life or pro-choice side. An example topic you can choose relating to EpicMafia might be whether or not banning users is effective.

On each of these threads, only the people who are debating can comment. However, there will be a poll included that allows users to vote which side they think is winning. This can be used to determine the winner. However, if not enough people vote or if there is a tie, then we might opt for judges to make the final decision.

Despite there being two teams usually in a court case, we will allow more than two if someone can present an additional point of view that differs from the others.

Rules

  • No harassment or personal attacks on the opposition. Doing so will result in a warning, and if continued, it will result in the person being removed from the debate. You are expected to always be respectful during debates.
  • You are NOT allowed to vote on more than one account. If we discover that multiple votes have been placed by you, then you will be disqualified from the voting process. If this was done by accident, please pm me.
  • Stay on topic. If you want to talk about things outside of the debate, then please do it somewhere else. Getting off topic will result in you being removed from the debate.
  • Rules are subject to change anytime for any reason at my discretion. I will inform of any rule changes to avoid confusion.
Sign here if
25 signed
You love to debate with other people because it's fun and allows you to experience the ideas of others from different backgrounds.
Would you consider taking part in this?
22
Yes, I would love to debate!
15
Yes, but I would only vote as the jury.
6
No.
about 8 years
where is the next debate link
about 8 years

cub says

when are we going to get a hc debate this pineapple pizza debate has fewer posts in one thread than the hc debate has in at least three separate threads


Each debate lasts a week so that people of all timezones and schedules have a chance to participate. The pineapple pizza debate will end later today. Howeever, the HC arguement does not have enough participants to go next. It seems like the death penalty debate will most likely be the debate we get tomorrow.
about 8 years
when are we going to get a hc debate this pineapple pizza debate has fewer posts in one thread than the hc debate has in at least three separate threads
about 8 years
cant stump the
deletedabout 8 years

cub says

tranny isnt censored because its not a word


im telling
about 8 years
also when i see tranny i think it looks like an endearing term probably because it ends in double letters + y which is a nearly universal rule for cute words (see: kitty, cubby wubby buddy)
about 8 years
tranny isnt censored because its not a word
deletedabout 8 years
HC works in more ways then just that

feel free to join the debate to hear differing viewpoints
deletedabout 8 years

CoryInConstantinople says

tran.ny


this website isnt working
deletedabout 8 years
that's my point
moderating something that isn't a universal truth is dumb

there's a difference between saying the word tran.ny and calling u a tran.ny directly
deletedabout 8 years
that's the debate

feel free to join it
deletedabout 8 years
hateful comments is arbitrary and differs from individual to individual so let's not try to moderate something that's completely subjective
deletedabout 8 years
lol
about 8 years
Certain users are so incredibly incompetent -- so saddening.
about 8 years
late as usual
about 8 years
When the sandbox thread is where the real debate is at

about 8 years
see, that's the problem

cloning is perfectly fine, human or otherwise (it's "playing god" no matter what you clone)

the problem is the consequence: if everyone lives forever and people continue to reproduce, humanity will starve itself

even if nobody reproduced, society would stagnate

so no cloning isn't wrong on principle but the consequences are dire, that's the difference. if you don't specify principle or practice, you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater
about 8 years

cub says

wait on the results of the debate over whether debates should be randomized


Whether you get to pick sides or if I assign people myself.


cub says

cloning is too nuanced because the problems are with the consequences and not with the concept


I'm not counting organ cloning. So it would full on human cloning. There are people who have a problem with that concept because they don't enjoy humans "playing god".
about 8 years

Jimbei says


Parudoks says

So what I'll be doing is, some of the debates will be randomized, some won't. I'll write it next to the debate in the OP. The random ones will be less sensitive. This is because someone who is pro-LGBT will not realistically debate as an anti-LGBT person.

So, that being said, I'm introducing my first randomized debate:

Is human cloning justified, and should it be permitted?


quoting for new viewers

hey cub feel free to quote your counterargument to this if you want for new viewers too, I think we can call this discussion satisfactory


cloning is too nuanced because the problems are with the consequences and not with the concept
about 8 years

Parudoks says


Parudoks says

New debate suggested by Cub (So people don't argue about it on this thread):

Barring external factors (i.e. AdSense), should people be banned for hateful comments? This does not include sustained individual harassment.


Now the question is... should it be randomized?


wait on the results of the debate over whether debates should be randomized
about 8 years

Parudoks says

New debate suggested by Cub (So people don't argue about it on this thread):

Barring external factors (i.e. AdSense), should people be banned for hateful comments? This does not include sustained individual harassment.



Now the question is... should it be randomized?
deletedabout 8 years

Parudoks says

So what I'll be doing is, some of the debates will be randomized, some won't. I'll write it next to the debate in the OP. The random ones will be less sensitive. This is because someone who is pro-LGBT will not realistically debate as an anti-LGBT person.

So, that being said, I'm introducing my first randomized debate:

Is human cloning justified, and should it be permitted?


quoting for new viewers

hey cub feel free to quote your counterargument to this if you want for new viewers too, I think we can call this discussion satisfactory
about 8 years
New debate suggested by Cub (So people don't argue on it on this thread):

Barring external factors (i.e. AdSense), should people be banned for hateful comments? This does not include sustained individual harassment.
about 8 years
same
deletedabout 8 years
I only know English unfortunately