i recall reading some stuff that MI5 really dropped the ball on that guy, but i also don't think the £167bn kill switch deterred him much from doing what he did
Well apparently we have thousands of people on record who are being monitored. Him being one of them. These things could potentially be prevented.
I need the NHS just like anyone else, but the fact we even have the NHS at all is a miracle. Just look at America.
i will definitely consider it the worst timeline if i have to start paying health insurance
the NHS has been failing BECAUSE of the underfunding. the funding didnt reduce because of the NHS's failings
Who funds the NHS tho. If the NHS needs to go, maybe you need to look at why, rather than who. I think we're extremely fortunate to have it, but it's insanely expensive.
i recall reading some stuff that MI5 really dropped the ball on that guy, but i also don't think the £167bn kill switch deterred him much from doing what he did
I need the NHS just like anyone else, but the fact we even have the NHS at all is a miracle. Just look at America.
i will definitely consider it the worst timeline if i have to start paying health insurance
the NHS has been failing BECAUSE of the underfunding. the funding didnt reduce because of the NHS's failings
Who funds the NHS tho. If the NHS needs to go, maybe you need to look at why, rather than who. I think we're extremely fortunate to have it, but it's insanely expensive.
I need the NHS just like anyone else, but the fact we even have the NHS at all is a miracle. Just look at America.
the "miracle" here is that tories haven't finished dismantling and privatising it yet, let's be clear about that
They privatised the trains. How did that one work out? How much money was lost? How much do train fares cost? This is an indication of how much money these things cost, and this is nowhere near the scale of the NHS.
Well the options are between someone who wants to remove funding from British security and basically wants to live in a communist society. The other is an evil bítch.
are you talking about trident? its in his manifesto that he won't do it and i think there are enough blairites to keep him in check if that's your worry.... not that i dont disagree with him personally, which biases my response to your concern
corbyn wants to add 20k officers to the street, after the numbers dropped because of tory cuts, he's investing in cyber security also...
unless you're talking about something else completely
I read the leaked Labour manifesto where he said something about, I think it was, 4.6bn cuts to Trident. Other than that he's been extremely vocal about his stance on the sort, saying that we absolutely need to move away from such things.
do you disagree we need to have more cyber security?
Well, let's look at what happened recently in Manchester, and even before that when there was talk of having our WhatsApp messages monitored because of what happened in London. We already have enough security to understand we have threats even within our own country. The security in itself seems to not have provided much in the way of necessary action to prevent harm from the people who live here, so I don't think it's a case of needing more cyber security, I believe it's a case of needing more professional security.
Well the options are between someone who wants to remove funding from British security and basically wants to live in a communist society. The other is an evil bítch.
are you talking about trident? its in his manifesto that he won't do it and i think there are enough blairites to keep him in check if that's your worry.... not that i dont disagree with him personally, which biases my response to your concern
corbyn wants to add 20k officers to the street, after the numbers dropped because of tory cuts, he's investing in cyber security also...
unless you're talking about something else completely
I read the leaked Labour manifesto where he said something about, I think it was, 4.6bn cuts to Trident. Other than that he's been extremely vocal about his stance on the sort, saying that we absolutely need to move away from such things.
do you disagree we need to have more cyber security?
Well, let's look at what happened recently in Manchester, and even before that when there was talk of having our WhatsApp messages monitored because of what happened in London. We already have enough security to understand we have threats even within our own country. The security in itself seems to not have provided much in the way of necessary action to prevent harm from the people who live here, so I don't think it's a case of needing more cyber security, I believe it's a case of needing more professional security.
I need the NHS just like anyone else, but the fact we even have the NHS at all is a miracle. Just look at America.
i will definitely consider it the worst timeline if i have to start paying health insurance
the NHS has been failing BECAUSE of the underfunding. the funding didnt reduce because of the NHS's failings
Who funds the NHS tho. If the NHS needs to go, maybe you need to look at why, rather than who. I think we're extremely fortunate to have it, but it's insanely expensive.
I need the NHS just like anyone else, but the fact we even have the NHS at all is a miracle. Just look at America.
i will definitely consider it the worst timeline if i have to start paying health insurance
the NHS has been failing BECAUSE of the underfunding. the funding didnt reduce because of the NHS's failings
Who funds the NHS tho. If the NHS needs to go, maybe you need to look at why, rather than who. I think we're extremely fortunate to have it, but it's insanely expensive.
Well the options are between someone who wants to remove funding from British security and basically wants to live in a communist society. The other is an evil bítch.
are you talking about trident? its in his manifesto that he won't do it and i think there are enough blairites to keep him in check if that's your worry.... not that i dont disagree with him personally, which biases my response to your concern
corbyn wants to add 20k officers to the street, after the numbers dropped because of tory cuts, he's investing in cyber security also...
unless you're talking about something else completely
I read the leaked Labour manifesto where he said something about, I think it was, 4.6bn cuts to Trident. Other than that he's been extremely vocal about his stance on the sort, saying that we absolutely need to move away from such things.
do you disagree we need to have more cyber security?
Well the options are between someone who wants to remove funding from British security and basically wants to live in a communist society. The other is an evil bítch.
are you talking about trident? its in his manifesto that he won't do it and i think there are enough blairites to keep him in check if that's your worry.... not that i dont disagree with him personally, which biases my response to your concern
corbyn wants to add 20k officers to the street, after the numbers dropped because of tory cuts, he's investing in cyber security also...
unless you're talking about something else completely
I read the leaked Labour manifesto where he said something about, I think it was, 4.6bn cuts to Trident. Other than that he's been extremely vocal about his stance on the sort, saying that we absolutely need to move away from such things.