i made up my own argumentative rule describing the relation between a god complex and a superiority complex
infallibility rule: in asserting that someone has ego for questioning you, you confirm that you have such an ego as to believe yourself unquestionable
when someone stops responding to the topic at hand (or needlessly interjects) and starts accusing the person they're arguing with of having some superiority complex, it proves nothing about the accused but in fact by believing that questioning you constitutes ego represents a sense of infallibility (a god complex), so while you prove nothing about the other person you confirm that you yourself are completely full of yourself
you ever look at a game or something and think "hey they looks easy to make" but then you dont even try because really its not, nothing is, and you'll never accomplish anything
you know what the greatest and most depressing thing about the internet is people see you how they want to see you, so if people want you to be a cute fox girl you can be a cute fox girl because there's nothing in contrast it's great because you can feel good about yourself and think that who you are is defined more by your personality than what you are, and it's depressing because it's all for nothing and when you look in the mirror you'll see what you actually are and nothing can change that, in the real world you'll always be defined by what you are and who you are just tags along
tiles
