why are sonrio and thecolonel conversing like equals
imagine
deletedabout 8 years
It's not as if there's just a single switch and we flipped and now there's going to be X amount of damage to the environment and then it's over and done with. Four years of "screw the environment, let's be prosperous now" could be the difference between higher sea levels and a runaway greenhouse effect.
deletedabout 8 years
Trump is going to be neutered by congress, who he has made an enemy of in its entirety. We've elected sterile breeding stock.
deletedabout 8 years
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
The environment was gone long ago. The last time I checked we're a good bit passed the irreversible damage point
I mean, yes, there is already plenty of damage done. But with each passing year we don't take action, we're doing more and more damage.
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
The environment was gone long ago. The last time I checked we're a good bit passed the irreversible damage point
Even if we had Shillary it wouldn't have changed a thing about America's stance on destroying the environment for profit.
deletedabout 8 years
A socially conservative SCOTUS is a bit disheartening but I'm cautiously optimistic that the potential rollback in social liberties people are foretelling is just reactionary panic and we'll continue to see victories on that front in state elections trickle in over time.
I'm probably gonna lose my healthcare within the next year or so which kind of blows.
I don't really know enough about the rest to say. Life will go on.
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
There's no way he can backtrack from the Paris agreement.
Um guys if you look up in the sky there's no dark pollution clouds so uh obviously there's nothing to prove global warming is real.........................
deletedabout 8 years
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
The environment was gone long ago. The last time I checked we're a good bit passed the irreversible damage point
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
so does that mean Bill Clinton (arcbell) is going to be in trump's cabinet after being impeached?
Connor+arcbell otp???
that explains their estranged love life now. Petri was his Monica Lewkinsky
deletedabout 8 years
I'm just concerned about the ramifications of a government that seems very unconcerned with the environment and more concerned with immediate economic benefit. I'm hoping (and suspect) that eliminating the EPA is one of those things Trump won't be able to follow through on. But even if he can't, that sort of attitude certainly suggests we won't be taking steps in the right direction to prevent serious irreversible damage to our planet.
so does that mean Bill Clinton (arcbell) is going to be in trump's cabinet after being impeached?
deletedabout 8 years
there's hope yet maybe he'll step down
deletedabout 8 years
guys guys guys guys what you're talking about is real nice but listen
this whole election was foreshadowed when harry was admin.
hear me out, hear me out
togepi was obama. she wasn't a fan favorite but she got s*it done. the s*it show made us miss 'em more. gerry was bernie. he WAS the fan favorite, the one who would've saved us. connor was hillary. (do i really need to go into detail)