if you played with crypto you wouldn't be impressed with shivv at all. they had the exact same play-style and crypto was a lot better
deletedabout 8 years
Idk if he's changed for the better but the only reason Shivv used to be good was because everyone would always get awestruck by his greatness and sheep him, he also was extremely dominant.
he basically just said the same thing over and over again but used different words from the thesaurus to make it sound like he was intelligent and had multiple points when really he wasn't all that
deletedabout 8 years
oh definitely! shivv can outplay anyone else on that list
Hi guys, I don't think anyone is actually better than everybody else here. There are more than 10 players who have shown brilliance in all aspects of the game and have also been consistent. I think if those players concentrate and play, they will be 100%. For example, I mess up a lot these days because I am distracted. This is about having fun. I think the player having most fun is the real winner. Everybody has fun in their own way. I enjoy experimenting and taking risks. Some people enjoy trolling.
deletedabout 8 years
I'm mad I even opened this thread let alone responded.
toodles~
deletedabout 8 years
Giga should be leading this poll easily
deletedabout 8 years
I would define social game more so as being able to actually figure out what needs to be done at any given table and adjusting your play style accordingly. In some games just spamming and acting like a chimp gets people to do what you want, others acting civilized and putting a lot of time and effort into making your ideas seem well thought out and presentable rallies the troops, some games just outright bullying and insulting people gets them to do what you want. Every game is different and it requires some prowess to maneuver each one with poise.
i would define this as a smooth talker or quick thinker. Someone that can get the person they are pleading to to understand them and listen to them.
deletedabout 8 years
despite being like "no boo can't possibly be cody" when I was told that
deletedabout 8 years
Maxwell not being on the main list is an atrocity.
deletedabout 8 years
i literally thought solace and cody were the same person until a few minutes ago
deletedabout 8 years
Solace, Tatami, and Cody all have different playstyles but I think individually they all have a glaring flaw
Boo - too passive and non-dynamic Cody - lack of social play and inability to manipulate effectively Tatami - tendency to let his emotions & ego cloud his judgement
social skills do matter even though it shouldn't. imagine you're the clear in 3 way and you're unsure about mafia, you have to hammer between someone insulting you (or someone you dislike) vs someone who is nice (or someone you like). most people would be inclined to hammer the person being rude. most people think like this - 'when in doubt hammer the rude player'
deletedabout 8 years
vilden can you explain social skills (in game ofc)
