Back to General Discussion

NEWS ALERT - MORE MOD ABUSE

over 8 years

ROADMAN IS THREATENING TO BAN WALRUS. RISE UP AND FIGHT AGAINST HIM.

R O A D M A N = C O R R U P T M A N

F R E E D O M
23
F R E E W A L R U S
6
D O W N W I T H C O R R U P T M A N
over 8 years
He must have a main account

He knew who I was in our first game together
over 8 years

roadman says


AItair says


roadman says

As a moderator or administrator, certain privileges are necessary in order to maintain the smooth running of the website. Such privileges include having the knowledge of which accounts belong to a specific user. This is necessary in order to track past history of those specific users. Whilst understanding that a user has made a new account, and has decided to unlink it prevent being tracked, they are inclined to disclose this information upon request. This is especially true when such users are provoking a volatile atmosphere on the forums with their copious threads which undermine the volunteers who are responsible for moderating the website.


I saw it as more seeing to them being held responsible for their actions but I guess from your position any lack of complete respect or submission is undermining lol!


There was a new thread every 5 minutes?


because his other threads were being locked/deleted/trolled?

i think like 3 threads in total and that was before Connor's thread which is the most recent issue Walrus had
deletedover 8 years
He isn't doing anything wrong brah
over 8 years
And if you honestly think imitating gimmick accounts to make complaint threads and insulting rating threads is 'constructive criticism', then you're being ridiculous.
over 8 years
its okay harry dont let him get to you
deletedover 8 years
I don't see the problem unless you have actual strong reason to suspect hes a banned user
over 8 years

AItair says


roadman says

As a moderator or administrator, certain privileges are necessary in order to maintain the smooth running of the website. Such privileges include having the knowledge of which accounts belong to a specific user. This is necessary in order to track past history of those specific users. Whilst understanding that a user has made a new account, and has decided to unlink it prevent being tracked, they are inclined to disclose this information upon request. This is especially true when such users are provoking a volatile atmosphere on the forums with their copious threads which undermine the volunteers who are responsible for moderating the website.


I saw it as more seeing to them being held responsible for their actions but I guess from your position any lack of complete respect or submission is undermining lol!


There was a new thread every 5 minutes?
over 8 years
C O N S T R U C T I V E C R I T I C I S M
over 8 years

lad says

Well actually I'm pretty certain lucid is strongly against users alternate accounts being outted.


Yes but he is not against the administrator having the knowledge of who those users are.
over 8 years

roadman says

As a moderator or administrator, certain privileges are necessary in order to maintain the smooth running of the website. Such privileges include having the knowledge of which accounts belong to a specific user. This is necessary in order to track past history of those specific users. Whilst understanding that a user has made a new account, and has decided to unlink it prevent being tracked, they are inclined to disclose this information upon request. This is especially true when such users are provoking a volatile atmosphere on the forums with their copious threads which undermine the volunteers who are responsible for moderating the website.


I saw it as more seeing to them being held responsible for their actions but I guess from your position any lack of complete respect or submission is undermining lol!
deletedover 8 years
Well actually I'm pretty certain lucid is strongly against users alternate accounts being outted.
deletedover 8 years
mods don't have access to foxiebox anymore?
over 8 years

ModHelper says


roadman says


ModHelper says

It is my opinion that mods have the best interest of the community in mind. That being said, I actually tend to agree with the user base here, walrus, whale and narwhal have done nothing wrong.

I think Roadman will act without bias or pride and overturn this decision.


Alternatively, people could have just been more cooperative in informing the administrator who they were, rather than making a thread saying I was making threats, simply because I was asking for the main account.


This is all well and good to say they should have "co-operated". Unfortunately though, when you make ultimatums such as, "you have 10 minutes or you are banned" that qualifies as a threat.

Surely this could have been handled better. Also there was a conflicting message as other mods such as Gerry spoke in support of not banning the accounts, this may have caused people to believe the threat was empty.


Those threats came after the thread was made, and the PMs were ignored.
over 8 years

moon says

ya cody's pretty wrong about that, anti-admin/mod content isn't censored and shouldn't be. it's always been common for unknown/unlinked accounts to be asked for main accounts if they appear to be banned users


Is it also common that they are banned when they provide this information, and then are unbanned when that information is brought to the public?
deletedover 8 years
Well lying about your main isn't banable at all, unless you're a banned user but walrus doesn't seem like a banned user at all!!
over 8 years
As a moderator or administrator, certain privileges are necessary in order to maintain the smooth running of the website. Such privileges include having the knowledge of which accounts belong to a specific user. This is necessary in order to track past history of those specific users. Whilst understanding that a user has made a new account, and has decided to unlink it prevent being tracked, they are inclined to disclose this information upon request. This is especially true when such users are provoking a volatile atmosphere on the forums with their copious threads which undermine the volunteers who are responsible for moderating the website.
over 8 years
like 4 months ago nobody would have taken these accounts seriously
over 8 years
Isn't BEET NEET though? I figured that out and posted it on the main lobby wall a week ago. I thought everybody knew it by now.
over 8 years
it's not a bannable offense. they banned him because they didn't know whether he was already banned or not.
over 8 years
ya cody's pretty wrong about that, anti-admin/mod content isn't censored and shouldn't be. it's always been common for unknown/unlinked accounts to be asked for main accounts if they are suspected of being banned users
deletedover 8 years

roadman says


ModHelper says

It is my opinion that mods have the best interest of the community in mind. That being said, I actually tend to agree with the user base here, walrus, whale and narwhal have done nothing wrong.

I think Roadman will act without bias or pride and overturn this decision.


Alternatively, people could have just been more cooperative in informing the administrator who they were, rather than making a thread saying I was making threats, simply because I was asking for the main account.


This is all well and good to say they should have "co-operated". Unfortunately though, when you make ultimatums such as, "you have 10 minutes or you are banned" that qualifies as a threat.

Surely this could have been handled better. Also there was a conflicting message as other mods such as Gerry spoke in support of not banning the accounts, this may have caused people to believe the threat was empty.
over 8 years

pereking says

pretty sure you getting banned had more to do with you lying about who you are than with you being annoying. though i'm sure they found that to be quite annoying.


still neither are ban-able offenses..
over 8 years

- I was not a well known user in the past
- My main, which had like 10 friends, I deleted
- BEET is now my main

Kind of funny because now Roadman is saying


roadman says

I don't know why you couldn't have been more genuine and co-operative when I first asked you for your main. I will unban WildNarwhal, but you never needed to disclose this publicly.



roadman says

Alternatively, people could have just been more cooperative in informing the administrator who they were, rather than making a thread saying I was making threats, simply because I was asking for the main account.

deletedover 8 years
i dont know what walrus did but here's my opinion anyways
over 8 years
pretty sure you getting banned had more to do with you lying about who you are than with you being annoying. though i'm sure they found that to be quite annoying.