Epicmafia

Back to Games

hearthstone

deletedabout 9 years

post hearthstone stuff itt

battletags:

Japter (EU) - japter #2297

Escurai (EU/NA) - OGBlue #2505

magictissue (unclear) - ieb #1908

BillStickers (NA) - BenGhazi #1416

BecameClear (EU) - Israelite #1143

shmeur (unclear) - shmeur #1563

Orly(vash) (NA) - Vexium #1587

NA and EU (mostly NA): UsrnmePendng #1479

roadman EU - Harry#2994

deletedalmost 9 years

roadman says

I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.

Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp

I think chillmaw fits in the deck somewhere

roadman

almost 9 years

I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.

Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp

roadman

almost 9 years

Also, proof that I didn't buy into combo druid in the past, what with being level 59 and all.

roadman

almost 9 years

To push for legend or not to push for legend?

roadman

almost 9 years

Reinhardt says

It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.

It's used in SMOrc decks.

deletedalmost 9 years

It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.

roadman

almost 9 years

pereking says

it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...

Yeah makes literally no sense.

pereking

almost 9 years

it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...

JimSpermWorm

almost 9 years

A 4-mana overload would be OK with me, gives you 2 turns to play/draw something to counter it.

deletedalmost 9 years

no matter what oveload I don't think you can balance a 4 mana 7/7 that can attack (excluding eerie statue there)

Sakushi

almost 9 years

Been playing C'thun ramp in standard it's actually going really well. Naturally i'm druid..

pereking

almost 9 years

the overload doesn't even make sense. why is it just 2 lol

deletedalmost 9 years

haha guys you know what'll make them regret asking for a bgh nerf? a 4 mana 7/7, sure showed them

pereking

almost 9 years

i'm playing cancer shaman and it's horiffic

deletedalmost 9 years

every time I've gone against an evolve deck they get doomsayer, bless

Orly

almost 9 years

malkorok is pretty bad, sadly.

roadman

almost 9 years

I'm too much of an Y'Shaarj fanboy.

hedger

almost 9 years

N'Zoth is just way too OP.

Poor dude... Just in case he could deal with my board before that....

Shmeur

almost 9 years

only legendary i have [aside form c'thun] is malkorok lmao i lowkey want to dust it

deletedalmost 9 years

my friend is using the 5/5 windfury dragonhawk with warrior's charge as his finisher

JimSpermWorm

almost 9 years

Update: 3/7 weapons from Malkorok has been Cursed Blade.

JimSpermWorm

almost 9 years

Well, the deck itself does well against slower decks [re: not face hunter/shaman] but it's no thanks to Mal.

JimSpermWorm

almost 9 years

I'll run a few charge games, he's definitely not the legendary I was hoping for but I'd still like to see him work.

roadman

almost 9 years

JimSpermWorm says

I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.

Grommash was used as a finisher for most warrior decks, 10 damage/10 mana charge/2 cards (unless you had Death's Bite ready to go).

Malkorok would be an 8 damage charger with 2 cards, but would also give you a weapon. If they have a small taunt up, the weapon could handle that, whilst Malkorok goes face.

In the same way as Grommash, Malkorok can also use Ysera's nightmare too.

I mean, I can't really see him being useful at all. Really weak stats for a 7 drop. That is basically the only scenario I could ever see him having a use in constructed.

Overall, I'd say he's more of an arena card.

JimSpermWorm

almost 9 years

I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.