hearthstone

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

post hearthstone stuff itt

battletags:

Japter (EU) - japter #2297

Escurai (EU/NA) - OGBlue #2505

magictissue (unclear) - ieb #1908

BillStickers (NA) - BenGhazi #1416

BecameClear (EU) - Israelite #1143

shmeur (unclear) - shmeur #1563

Orly(vash) (NA) - Vexium #1587

NA and EU (mostly NA): UsrnmePendng #1479

roadman EU - Harry#2994

Poll
fave class
priest24%36
mage17%26
rogue13%19
warrior8%13
shaman8%12
warlock7%11
hunter6%10
druid6%9
paladin6%9
Game Board

No players on the board yet.

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
roadman
I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.



Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp
I think chillmaw fits in the deck somewhere
roadmanover 10 years agoedited
I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.



Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp
roadmanover 10 years ago
Also, proof that I didn't buy into combo druid in the past, what with being level 59 and all.
roadmanover 10 years ago


To push for legend or not to push for legend?
roadmanover 10 years ago
Reinhardt
It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.
It's used in SMOrc decks.
deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited
It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.
roadmanover 10 years ago
pereking
it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...
Yeah makes literally no sense.
perekingover 10 years ago
it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...
JimSpermWormover 10 years ago
A 4-mana overload would be OK with me, gives you 2 turns to play/draw something to counter it.
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
no matter what oveload I don't think you can balance a 4 mana 7/7 that can attack (excluding eerie statue there)
Sakushiover 10 years ago
Been playing C'thun ramp in standard it's actually going really well. Naturally i'm druid..
perekingover 10 years ago
the overload doesn't even make sense. why is it just 2 lol
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
haha guys you know what'll make them regret asking for a bgh nerf? a 4 mana 7/7, sure showed them
perekingover 10 years ago
i'm playing cancer shaman and it's horiffic
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
every time I've gone against an evolve deck they get doomsayer, bless
Orlyover 10 years ago
malkorok is pretty bad, sadly.
roadmanover 10 years ago
I'm too much of an Y'Shaarj fanboy.
hedgerover 10 years ago
N'Zoth is just way too OP.



Poor dude... Just in case he could deal with my board before that....

10
Shmeurover 10 years ago
only legendary i have [aside form c'thun] is malkorok lmao i lowkey want to dust it
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
my friend is using the 5/5 windfury dragonhawk with warrior's charge as his finisher
JimSpermWormover 10 years ago
Update: 3/7 weapons from Malkorok has been Cursed Blade.
10
JimSpermWormover 10 years ago
Well, the deck itself does well against slower decks [re: not face hunter/shaman] but it's no thanks to Mal.
JimSpermWormover 10 years ago
I'll run a few charge games, he's definitely not the legendary I was hoping for but I'd still like to see him work.
roadmanover 10 years ago
JimSpermWorm
I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.
Grommash was used as a finisher for most warrior decks, 10 damage/10 mana charge/2 cards (unless you had Death's Bite ready to go).

Malkorok would be an 8 damage charger with 2 cards, but would also give you a weapon. If they have a small taunt up, the weapon could handle that, whilst Malkorok goes face.

In the same way as Grommash, Malkorok can also use Ysera's nightmare too.

I mean, I can't really see him being useful at all. Really weak stats for a 7 drop. That is basically the only scenario I could ever see him having a use in constructed.

Overall, I'd say he's more of an arena card.
JimSpermWormover 10 years agoedited
I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.