Epicmafia

Back to Games

hearthstone

deletedabout 10 years

post hearthstone stuff itt

battletags:

Japter (EU) - japter #2297

Escurai (EU/NA) - OGBlue #2505

magictissue (unclear) - ieb #1908

BillStickers (NA) - BenGhazi #1416

BecameClear (EU) - Israelite #1143

shmeur (unclear) - shmeur #1563

Orly(vash) (NA) - Vexium #1587

NA and EU (mostly NA): UsrnmePendng #1479

roadman EU - Harry#2994

deletedalmost 10 years

roadman says

I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.

Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp

I think chillmaw fits in the deck somewhere

roadman

almost 10 years

I started playing Face Shaman at rank 2->rank 1 because it's the last day and I wanted to get legend, but then I dropped back to rank 2 so I reverted back to my Astral Communion deck.

Anyway.

Rank 16-Legend in basically no time playing 99% strictly Astral Communion.

Here's my deck:

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/510986-legend-astral-communion-deck-with-consistent-ramp

roadman

almost 10 years

Also, proof that I didn't buy into combo druid in the past, what with being level 59 and all.

roadman

almost 10 years

To push for legend or not to push for legend?

roadman

almost 10 years

Reinhardt says

It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.

It's used in SMOrc decks.

deletedalmost 10 years

It still doesn't quite fit with in current evolving shaman deck though, no synergy with evolve and master of evolution.

roadman

almost 10 years

pereking says

it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...

Yeah makes literally no sense.

pereking

almost 10 years

it's a 7/7 for 4. it should have 3 overload...

JimSpermWorm

almost 10 years

A 4-mana overload would be OK with me, gives you 2 turns to play/draw something to counter it.

deletedalmost 10 years

no matter what oveload I don't think you can balance a 4 mana 7/7 that can attack (excluding eerie statue there)

Sakushi

almost 10 years

Been playing C'thun ramp in standard it's actually going really well. Naturally i'm druid..

pereking

almost 10 years

the overload doesn't even make sense. why is it just 2 lol

deletedalmost 10 years

haha guys you know what'll make them regret asking for a bgh nerf? a 4 mana 7/7, sure showed them

pereking

almost 10 years

i'm playing cancer shaman and it's horiffic

deletedalmost 10 years

every time I've gone against an evolve deck they get doomsayer, bless

Orly

almost 10 years

malkorok is pretty bad, sadly.

roadman

almost 10 years

I'm too much of an Y'Shaarj fanboy.

hedger

almost 10 years

N'Zoth is just way too OP.

Poor dude... Just in case he could deal with my board before that....

Shmeur

almost 10 years

only legendary i have [aside form c'thun] is malkorok lmao i lowkey want to dust it

deletedalmost 10 years

my friend is using the 5/5 windfury dragonhawk with warrior's charge as his finisher

JimSpermWorm

almost 10 years

Update: 3/7 weapons from Malkorok has been Cursed Blade.

JimSpermWorm

almost 10 years

Well, the deck itself does well against slower decks [re: not face hunter/shaman] but it's no thanks to Mal.

JimSpermWorm

almost 10 years

I'll run a few charge games, he's definitely not the legendary I was hoping for but I'd still like to see him work.

roadman

almost 10 years

JimSpermWorm says

I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.

Grommash was used as a finisher for most warrior decks, 10 damage/10 mana charge/2 cards (unless you had Death's Bite ready to go).

Malkorok would be an 8 damage charger with 2 cards, but would also give you a weapon. If they have a small taunt up, the weapon could handle that, whilst Malkorok goes face.

In the same way as Grommash, Malkorok can also use Ysera's nightmare too.

I mean, I can't really see him being useful at all. Really weak stats for a 7 drop. That is basically the only scenario I could ever see him having a use in constructed.

Overall, I'd say he's more of an arena card.

JimSpermWorm

almost 10 years

I don't really think Malkorok's going to make a difference in a charge deck - 7 mana for a weapon? The game's probably decided by then.