I don't dispute that, I'm not a Seahawks fan, nor do I think the Patriots didn't deserve to win the Super Bowl.
I'm just saying that the people who think the Vikings are better then the Seahawks are laughable (Seahawks won both games they played this year, both were in Minnesota and one was a blowout). And the argument Jack used to dispute this claim requires the same ludicrous logic to claiming the Patriots didn't deserve to win the Super Bowl.
I also think that it's not really disputable that the best NFL team of the last three years is the Seahawks (Lions fan, so not really biased).
People cry about Patriots alledgedly letting 2 PSI out of a football and filming opponent's signals(which is legal, BTW, but not in the spot they were filming in, and that was legal until 2006), but not one talks about:(per yourteamcheats.com) 1. Broncos cheating the salary cap during their Super Bowl winning years. 2. Falcons pumping in crowd noise. 3. '70s Steelers taking steroids(Bradshaw even admitted to it) 4. 49ers cheating salary cap in 2000, Skins and Cowboys in 2010. 5. Jerry Rice using stickum. 6. Dolphins signing Shula while he was still with the Colts 7. Saints bounty program. 8. Packers getting kicked out of the league in 1921 for recruiting college players
just realized that the 4 teams who had qbs with no prior postseason experience all lost, while the 4 teams who had qbs with prior postseason experience all won
There's nothing lucky about that a cornerback making an interception by anticipating a route that he'd already seen in practice.
deletedalmost 9 years
pats fans have had to deal to deal with being on the losing side of luck for soooo long. yes, the butler interception was pretty lucky, but the pats still won.
But I'd still argue that the pats were better than the seahawks. If you watch the entire game, they were the better team imo. And let's not forget how the seahawks got so close to the endzone in the first place, that ridiculously lucky, almost helmet catch 2.0, catch.
