I'm pretty sure I know 2 of them, but I'll keep that to myself. Everything is done and finished. Can we move on from this?
deletedabout 10 years
'3 mods agreed with me so i am right, that's just how it is'
What likely happened is that 3 mods were in the chat while Slow decided to condemn gerryoat1 right then and there and he took those nods of approvals as a sign to ban gerryoat1 without waiting a bit longer for other mods to weigh in lol
deletedabout 10 years
3 bad mods to be replaced
deletedabout 10 years
YOU DON'T REFUSE TO RECONSIDER A POSITION WHEN SOMEONE BEING BANNED FOR HALF A YEAR IS ON THE LINE.
actually, i do. i wouldn't move forward with something that comes down to being convinced with the "she said" of a 'he said she said".
deletedabout 10 years
Yeah I'm still curious as to who the other three mods are.
deletedabout 10 years
there's a lot i can look past or just see as a difference in philosophy but this is legitimately pissing me off.
what bothers me is a round suspension without a vio basically concedes that there was wrongdoing, but lucid wants to go halvsies and refuse to give gerry the cheating vio he earned. i don't care about a DQ, i care about giving out a cheating vio that i spent time identifying.
so you admit your goal is to ban people rather than actually come to the best outcome?
no, i care about punishing people who break rules. that's what mods do.
What if gerryoat1 didn't break a rule and you were wrong?
there's a lot i can look past or just see as a difference in philosophy but this is legitimately pissing me off.
what bothers me is a round suspension without a vio basically concedes that there was wrongdoing, but lucid wants to go halvsies and refuse to give gerry the cheating vio he earned. i don't care about a DQ, i care about giving out a cheating vio that i spent time identifying.
so you admit your goal is to ban people rather than actually come to the best outcome?
no, i care about punishing people who break rules. that's what mods do.
What if gerryoat1 didn't break a rule and you were wrong?
bear can never be wrong.
References: all the other times he was wrong
deletedabout 10 years
there's a lot i can look past or just see as a difference in philosophy but this is legitimately pissing me off.
what bothers me is a round suspension without a vio basically concedes that there was wrongdoing, but lucid wants to go halvsies and refuse to give gerry the cheating vio he earned. i don't care about a DQ, i care about giving out a cheating vio that i spent time identifying.
so you admit your goal is to ban people rather than actually come to the best outcome?
no, i care about punishing people who break rules. that's what mods do.
What if gerryoat1 didn't break a rule and you were wrong?