because i don't believe i was. i'm nto gonna say sorry to gerryoat1, and i don't think iw as wrong. "i'm sorry that i'm confident in my decisions and gave the vio when 3 separate people agreed" sounds pretty damn passive aggressive, but that's as close as i'm getting.
deletedabout 10 years
I, Slow, admit that I could've possibly been wrong about something, even if I feel that I wasn't
Signed, x___________
deletedabout 10 years
You know im done the current mods are just inactive/bad theres no point
Just remember that im active and not a player Tata
deletedabout 10 years
no i think prevail got unbanned beats me
deletedabout 10 years
Which was much different from this case, I just don't know why you can't admit that maybe you could've been wrong
i will end this elitist circle of misfits and domestic terrorists and bring in a new reign of goodness and uniformity. join me, and you too can purge the site of these dangerous criminals that call themselves our best hope for justice. let us show them true democracy. vote for freedom, vote orly.
it's better to let someone who cheated win a trophy then ban them later than ban someone who didn't cheat get banned for 6 months and lose a trophy because your ego clouds your thinking.
deletedabout 10 years
the actual difference was skype logs proved OGC, but we all agreed there was cheating going on before we even gave rawr a chance to defend herself. the vio and DQ only took place once dan had her skype.
deletedabout 10 years
You're right.
deletedabout 10 years
Gee garbage 90% of the threads made are garbage
deletedabout 10 years
The difference there was that he was caught in a lie and pretended to be his cousin
