Back to Epicmafia

Round 300 Discussion

deletedover 10 years

Congratulations to the winners of Round 297!



Good luck to the participants of Round 300!

Join the competition!!


deletedover 10 years

Rerisen says


Slow says

i have read none of these posts, but i'm right anyway


same


pay attention to the skype group im stealing Caroline away right infront of ur eyes, go warn jack
over 10 years
Using a ml to test a guilty is dumb especially when said guilty is agreeing with the test which would be gamethrowing for scum.
over 10 years
you guys are arguing principles. "only lynch scum" vs "risking the ML for autowin". safe plays vs risk/reward. both are valid. stop arguing
deletedover 10 years

mist says

honestly, if the cop was obvious the only thing you're arguing between is the order in which you lynch jan and miller, since I'm assuming you'll lynch the real cops guilty after you lynch his CC.


exactly, so why wouldn't you lynch the guilty day 1 then. zovea is literally confirming that he is

i'm allowing the filter to do it's work now since i have a bunch of notes, i won't even bypass this filter for a while
deletedover 10 years

Slow says

i have read none of these posts, but i'm right anyway


same
deletedover 10 years
i have read none of these posts, but i'm right anyway
deletedover 10 years
what are we arguing about nowwww
over 10 years
Unless you're playing FP which is the only setup in rotation where both innos and guilties are absolutes.
deletedover 10 years
man man man man man man man man man
deletedover 10 years

UniversalStudios says


mist says

this argument is entirely based on opinion and yet both of you are stating the other is wrong as if it's fact.



Slow says

testing the guilty in any setup is always a bad idea unless it results in autowin





are you trying to tell me that if not yours, i should defer to slow's opinion as being fact? because that will not get you very far with me, friend.
deletedover 10 years

UniversalStudios says


mist says

this argument is entirely based on opinion and yet both of you are stating the other is wrong as if it's fact.



Slow says

testing the guilty in any setup is always a bad idea unless it results in autowin





if the guilty was lawyer it would have been near auto win, it was a 50/50 chance of it being lawyer since we all agreed that the cop who innod him was mafia.
deletedover 10 years
honestly, if the cop was obvious the only thing you're arguing between is the order in which you lynch jan and miller, since I'm assuming you'll lynch the real cops guilty after you lynch his CC.
deletedover 10 years
SQUADD
over 10 years

mist says

this argument is entirely based on opinion and yet both of you are stating the other is wrong as if it's fact.



Slow says

testing the guilty in any setup is always a bad idea unless it results in autowin

over 10 years
i am actually dude
over 10 years
well, i guess i should be objective and say that lynching the miller day 1 is fine. ignoring confirmations (we all agree the town cop was obvious town) it's a coinflip chance @ autowin that shouldn't be ignored
deletedover 10 years
this argument is entirely based on opinion and yet both of you are stating the other is wrong as if it's fact.
over 10 years
deletedover 10 years
if you have more than five trophies, you probably suffer from acne irl
deletedover 10 years
cop ccs, one cop has a guilty. i scum hunt in cops, i determine the cop with a guilty is the real cop, hurr durr lemme lynch his cc to end up lynching his guilty tomorrow, giving mafia a chance to hit doc the following night and giving me no clears
deletedover 10 years
let's all make fun of all the people who try in current mafia and have less trohpies than me
over 10 years
Is the meta really so poor that lynching obvious mafia as town is a poor strategy?
deletedover 10 years
you being wrong?
over 10 years
I don't even find this amusing, it's just sad.
deletedover 10 years
certainly seems like it wasn't the best part of yours, buddy