1. Orc died on a blue 2. One cop claims inno on a person, the other cop claims guilty on that same person 5 seconds later.
We both agreed and I even said the first cop claim was most likely mafia based off our own reads, so are you telling me you wouldn't want to use the ML on the guilty/inno knowing that the cop who guilted him town told better than the other cop so the report was real, HOWEVER there were only 3 possible outcomes,
1. His partner bussed his nilla 2. His partner innod his lawyer 3. janitor innod miller 4. janitor guilted blue
Every single one of those outcomes confirms a cop the next day, and even if the janitor did stupidly bus his nilla, which I said in game is literally impossible, the other cop would've gotten a day 2 report UNLESS THE MAFIA SACCD THE COP knowing the doctor would be on them, however that too would retain the ml the next day.
Or was it when I was saying that if you wanted to lynch someone to test if they were really guilty, you'd be better to lynch the obvious scum claim that wasn't putting forth any effort to win the game.
tfw you lie to someone in the gy about who your mafia partner is and the clear promptly mishammers a 3way... then postgame said person in gy is mad at you. hm....
It's an alternative to lynching someone that's probably town, but you don't actually town read them over the person they're stopping you from scum reading.