The underlying point being that you have a vast propensity to prove yourselves to one another.
deletedalmost 10 years
phew!! thank god i was an effing JOCK
deletedalmost 10 years
maybe peta was too lol. i dunno tho
deletedalmost 10 years
You remember in school where there'd be like a few major peer groups, be them emos, grungers, chavs or whatever, there'd always be a few individuals, however, that followed the same path but never really fitted in. They'd either end up spending their lunch hours in solitude, or they would become a collective of inbetweeners, though they'd never look quite right together. Reading the bunch of you squabble reminds me of those kinda people.
deletedalmost 10 years
i don't think anyone was taking this seriously harrold. besides maybe robert
deletedalmost 10 years
I think some of you guys need to step back and actually look at what you're saying. This is a pathetic conversation.
I think I insulted him at some point in the last couple months
deletedalmost 10 years
robert's like spiderman in the way that he attaches himself to things (in this case, threads) that you would not expect someone of his abysmal intellectual stature to do. also he has something akin to spidey senses except instead of detecting ruthless villainy in the greater metropolitan area he has a 6th sense for when people innately more competent than him are posting.
I can't argue the point that we disagree on things despite there being a multitude of issues that we have clearly disagreed upon, on these very forums. That, or I just think it's an embarrassingly ridiculous point of discussion
