← Back to Off Topic

Anthony as a Mod

deleteddeletedover 11 years ago

Anthony is a good guy, an amazing player, and probably a good mod. However, I think it's important to enforce a no-tolerance approach on cheaters as mods.

deleteddeletedover 11 years agoedited
Harrold
mist
what perks
+10.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
But when has Sonseray ever contributed a good thread OP?
Jasprarover 11 years ago
I got to page 3 and got bored
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
things like "attention and respect on the internet" that wouldn't be perks to people like you or me are a lot of the reasoning behind people wanting to be moderators and you're a fool to pretend it isn't
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Jasprar
Bad thread, imho
Bad OP, the thread is okay.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
lol
Jasprarover 11 years agoedited
Bad thread, imho
4
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
mist
what perks
+10.
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Devante
BiIIStickers
mist
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
i feel like limiting your volunteers like that isn't actually a good plan.
then maybe they shouldn't be volunteering

if people want the perks of being a moderator on the site while not actually doing the job then make them pay for it within the confines of the site rather than enforcing some arbitrary quota
You don't tell someone volunteering in a soup kitchen that they can't take a break because the queque of homeless people is too long.

They're doing it out of the goodness of their heart.
no they aren't, don't be stupid.

the mods, not the soup kitchen guys.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Actually, most mods are doing this so they can have a sense of power of people on the internet, but the analogy still holds weight lol ayyyy
1
UniversalStudiosover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
"people playing red heart games for 3 hours while the report queue is at 80+" and being a mod for a limited amount of time doesn't really excuse the latter
You mean FP point farmers would rather farm point than reports?
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
mist
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
i feel like limiting your volunteers like that isn't actually a good plan.
then maybe they shouldn't be volunteering

if people want the perks of being a moderator on the site while not actually doing the job then make them pay for it within the confines of the site rather than enforcing some arbitrary quota
You don't tell someone volunteering in a soup kitchen that they can't take a break because the queque of homeless people is too long.

They're doing it out of the goodness of their heart.
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
mist
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
i feel like limiting your volunteers like that isn't actually a good plan.
then maybe they shouldn't be volunteering

if people want the perks of being a moderator on the site while not actually doing the job then make them pay for it within the confines of the site rather than enforcing some arbitrary quota
what perks
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Devante
Harrold
I would consider it more of a site-wide limitation. Or put a quota on the amount of reports a player can make to one every three days or so. People would value their liberty to report a lot more.
No
Why not?
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
i've been saying for 4 years that the overreporting problem goes away if people are blocked from filing all reports for 10 minutes after the end of their most recent game so people have a chance to cool off but ~phil~
sure that gets rid of the frivolous reports, but it also stops people from making legitimate reports that should be vios because 10 minutes later people care less or have forgotten or got pissed off went off the computer or entered a new game.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Harrold
I would consider it more of a site-wide limitation. Or put a quota on the amount of reports a player can make to one every three days or so. People would value their liberty to report a lot more.
No
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
mist
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
i feel like limiting your volunteers like that isn't actually a good plan.
then maybe they shouldn't be volunteering

if people want the perks of being a moderator on the site while not actually doing the job then make them pay for it within the confines of the site rather than enforcing some arbitrary quota
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
I would consider it more of a site-wide limitation. Or put a quota on the amount of reports a player can make to one every three days or so. People would value their liberty to report a lot more.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Just dropping in to say Jericho was actually a really good mod when we modded alongside each other and I have pretty high expectations of Anthony as well.
2
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
i feel like limiting your volunteers like that isn't actually a good plan.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
That's actually a great solution.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Harrold
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
Well it would be a great application to the whole site in its entirety. The report system is used far too quickly.
i've been saying for 4 years that the overreporting problem goes away if people are blocked from filing all reports for 10 minutes after the end of their most recent game so people have a chance to cool off but ~phil~
13
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
Nah
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
BiIIStickers
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows
Well it would be a great application to the whole site in its entirety. The report system is used far too quickly.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
i feel like "no one is allowed to play in any games until the report count gets back under 40" is such an obvious solution that it must've been discussed before but who knows