is it really worth ruining a round just to prove them wrong
yeah, actually. spiting people that are haughty enough to try and force everyone to only play competitive java mafia their way is ridiculous, and nothing that isn't mechanically broken due to philcode or a demonstratable pointfarm shouldn't be banned
is it really worth ruining a round just to prove them wrong
answer is Yes.
deletedalmost 10 years
none of the setups that are comped are round-dominating so i don't want to comp something like b2ns/bv/o2r that would be round dominating when we could have 6 fresh setups
if you're gonna stick to this ill comp a second real setup
none of the setups that are comped are round-dominating so i don't want to comp something like b2ns/bv/o2r that would be round dominating when we could have 6 fresh setups
fancy pants is cancer. it only took me 300 games of it to realize.
Comp classic mafia, at least.
deletedalmost 10 years
i'm recomping fancy pants, because no one is willing or able to provide a real reason for its removal. so far, it looks like the leader in the clubhouse is "former admin precedent, from a guy that almost got the site shut down"
The mason one sucks to play. There is very little point to the setup and I find it bad and boring.
I also dislike samurai, I think it is a bad role.
well, your analysis's are meaningless because your justifications aren't actually any good. hope this helps
"i got guiltied as mafia in the mason setup so it sucks. also, the samurai that acts purely as a clear and has no real mechanical value sucks as a role, therefore the setup sucks"